Cancelled by server

Author	Message
[AF>HFR>RR] Jim PROFIT Send message Joined: 3 Jun 07 Posts: 107 Credit: 31,331,137 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 8833 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 13:13:49 UTC After 54853 seconds, this WU was canceled by the server. Why? I understand if a wu is canceled before the WU start. But after 15H, i don't understand! Jim PROFIT ID: 8833 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Toni Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 8837 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 13:57:02 UTC - in response to Message 8833. Can you please post the WU id? ID: 8837 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

[AF>HFR>RR] Jim PROFIT Send message Joined: 3 Jun 07 Posts: 107 Credit: 31,331,137 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 8839 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 14:11:16 UTC This one Jim PROFIT ID: 8839 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 298,573,998 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 8842 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 15:04:40 UTC I also got one cancelled that was already running. 402410 pixelicious.at - my little photoblog ID: 8842 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ignasi Send message Joined: 10 Apr 08 Posts: 254 Credit: 16,836,000 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 8851 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 17:16:42 UTC - in response to Message 8842. Sorry for that but I canceled them because they had an error that appeared AFTER ALL the computation had been done and 0 credits granted. As an example check this task 564588. The fixed batch is already out. ignasi ID: 8851 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Stefan Ledwina Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 298,573,998 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 8852 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 17:27:28 UTC - in response to Message 8851. No problem! Better they get cancelled than to waste CPU time and energy... Stefan pixelicious.at - my little photoblog ID: 8852 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote