Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
Vista slower than XP? Yes!
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On your XP machine I can't find a wu similar to the new one you just linked. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
Paul D. BuckSend message Joined: 9 Jun 08 Posts: 1050 Credit: 37,321,185 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The KASHIF tasks seem to take about twice as long as the "older" more standard tasks. On my i7 machine they take 12 to 13 hours which is about double the 6.5 hours of the others. The only downer is that it seems to mess up the DCF some so then ALL tasks from GPU Grid are now rated at 10-15 hours. As I run off the shorter ones the numbers start to fall again. Can't you guy submit these tasks with a different plan or something to stop doing that to me ... it screws up the work queue estimates. Life is hard enough already trying to convince the developers that there are problems. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Apparently that would mean resubmitting the batch and lossing the current results (link). MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
Paul D. BuckSend message Joined: 9 Jun 08 Posts: 1050 Credit: 37,321,185 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Apparently that would mean resubmitting the batch and lossing the current results (link). Ah, missed that ... somehow ... it matters little to me one way or t'other |
ZydorSend message Joined: 8 Feb 09 Posts: 252 Credit: 1,309,451 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
@Zydor: about 55°C with 2 120mm fans at ~500 rpm on an Acceleron S1 Rev 2. Why? Oppps - profuse apologies, I missed the reply - many thanks, no particular reason, just curious as I have a 9800GTX+ running a mild o/c 778/1930/1100X2 @63C. Its in a mid tower case with a four disk raid, and a Phenom2 running at 3.2Ghz, a little cramped re space and airflow. So I expect heat in there to be up a little on the "norm". I am always interested in what others are finding re temperature, never too old to learn from others as they say. Just being careful over time I dont push it too far, I'm not an o/c maniac and dont push to the edges - life's too short for that grief rofl :) Regards Zy |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sounds like a good strategy! My clocks are almost similar: 756 / 1944 / 1070 and I think your temp is quite good. Is it stock cooling at a high fan speed? This is getting a little OT, but interesting nevertheless.. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra