Core or Shader?

Author	Message
Blizzie Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 3,505,971 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7896 - Posted: 27 Mar 2009, 6:01:44 UTC Last modified: 27 Mar 2009, 6:15:16 UTC What is more important when crunching? Higher Core speed or higher Shader? Some say to leave Core at stock and overclock only the Shader. Some say to overclock both and leave memory untouched. I'm trying to get the biggest output. So.. what is it? ID: 7896 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7899 - Posted: 27 Mar 2009, 9:10:22 UTC - in response to Message 7896. Core and shader first, memory second. Just be sure to test it properly and if your card starts to error out occasionally don't forget to take the OC back a bit and see if it helps. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 ID: 7899 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Blizzie Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 3,505,971 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7902 - Posted: 27 Mar 2009, 9:24:16 UTC - in response to Message 7899. Should it be both core and shader? Or just highest shader possible, leaving core and memory stock? ID: 7902 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7915 - Posted: 27 Mar 2009, 19:30:27 UTC - in response to Message 7902. Both. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 ID: 7915 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote