GTX9800+ vs GTS250

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : GTX9800+ vs GTS250
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
jrobbio

Send message
Joined: 13 Mar 09
Posts: 59
Credit: 324,366
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 7781 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 22:12:00 UTC

As if luck would have it, a workunit put two cards together that are virtually the same, but GTS250 should have the edge due to the 55nm board. However, looking at the results below suggests I am wrong:

From GTS250 Task ID 432911

core_client_version>6.6.15</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# Using CUDA device 0
# Device 0: "GeForce GTS 250"
# Clock rate: 1890000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 1073414144 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 16
# Number of cores: 128
# Time per step: 141.641 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 88525.497 s
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>


From GTX9800+ Task ID 433779

<core_client_version>6.4.5</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# Using CUDA device 1
# Device 0: "GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+"
# Clock rate: 1890000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 536608768 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 16
# Number of cores: 128
# Time per step: 60.070 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 37543.545 s
called boinc_finish
</stderr_txt>
]]>


Things that are the same:

    * Number of multiprocessors
    * Clock Rate



Things that are different:


    * Boinc Version
    * Global Memory
    * Time Per Step
    * Elapsed Time



Anyone have any idea why the GTX9800+ would perform over twice as fast?

Note: I am running two other projects at the same time (one which is CPDN), but I have 3Gb of memory so I didn't think it is the factor in this instance?

Rob

ID: 7781 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 7783 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 22:41:27 UTC - in response to Message 7781.  

The cards should perform identically and the 55 nm chip (which should also be on the 9800 GTX+, anyway) doesn't make any difference in performance. In your list there's also a task with 90 ms / step and one with 75, which would be much more in line with expectations.

Do you have any other 3D software running (game) while running GPU-Grid? Was the wall clock time really ~24h?

MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
ID: 7783 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Ed1934158

Send message
Joined: 15 Mar 09
Posts: 32
Credit: 3,313,639
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 7785 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 22:57:47 UTC - in response to Message 7783.  

I think that these cards are identical, GTS250, and 9800GTX+.
ID: 7785 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
jrobbio

Send message
Joined: 13 Mar 09
Posts: 59
Credit: 324,366
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 7786 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 22:58:03 UTC - in response to Message 7783.  

MrS wrote:

Do you have any other 3D software running (game) while running GPU-Grid?


I only had a quick 30 minute game in the whole period it was running and that was on the not very intensive Quake Live

MrS wrote:

Was the wall clock time really ~24h?


It was about 21 hours (75600 seconds).

I've just installed the new Nvidia beta drivers that came out today, so I will see if they improve things at all. My anti-virus is told to ignore the Boinc folders. Is there anything else I can check?

Rob
ID: 7786 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile mikaok
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 09
Posts: 12
Credit: 639,094
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 7812 - Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 18:35:41 UTC - in response to Message 7785.  

I think that these cards are identical, GTS250, and 9800GTX+.


Yep. Only difference is the name and pricing.
ID: 7812 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 7826 - Posted: 25 Mar 2009, 8:57:26 UTC - in response to Message 7812.  

Yep. Only difference is the name and pricing.


And the PCB layout, idle clocks and idle power consumption. but none of these affect performance.

MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
ID: 7826 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : GTX9800+ vs GTS250

©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra