ATI vs NVIDIA GPUs

Message boards : Number crunching : ATI vs NVIDIA GPUs
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
TomaszPawel

Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 08
Posts: 121
Credit: 59,836,411
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 11679 - Posted: 5 Aug 2009, 21:45:56 UTC - in response to Message 11676.  
Last modified: 5 Aug 2009, 21:48:48 UTC

In the end, the credits are meaningless. The only way to have any concrete gain from distributed computing is to run folding@home for the Evga team and you can get EVGA Bucks to contribute to the purchase of an EVGA card.


You imply that "not being meaningless" equals "concrete gain", something which you seem to define as "getting something of material value" (or something like that).

For me I'd say I get lots of concrete gain due to DC. It's a hobby, I can enjoy spending time on it whenever I want to (and other duties permit it). That's nothing to touch, but it's a very real "gain" for me.

... but in the end the point totals only exist to encourage people to participate. 10 points a day and 100,000 point per day are really the same thing.
The real bonus is that the computations are going to help medical science or astromomy or mathematics.


The credits also reflect the amount of contribution. Therefore they also exist to show people how good their systems are at what they're doing.

You're right that just by itself 10 or 100,000 credits don't mean anything, as it could be any arbitrary number / scaling factor. However, there's not just one of these numbers. The different amounts of credits enable comparisons between systems and projects (how valid these are is another question) and 10 credits do not equal 100,000 any more when your co-cruncher gets 1000.

MrS


Which has what to do with "ATI vs nVidia GPUs"?

MrS


Good Question

If we want to be so pure we must make other tread?
POLISH NATIONAL TEAM - Join! Crunch! Win!
ID: 11679 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Beyond
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 08
Posts: 1112
Credit: 6,162,416,256
RAC: 0
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 12983 - Posted: 2 Oct 2009, 17:35:10 UTC
Last modified: 2 Oct 2009, 17:35:50 UTC

Are there any new developments on the ATI GPU front for GPUGRID?
Are there apps based on OpenCL planned in the near future?
Thanks!
ID: 12983 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Paul D. Buck

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 08
Posts: 1050
Credit: 37,321,185
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 12985 - Posted: 2 Oct 2009, 18:29:55 UTC - in response to Message 12983.  
Last modified: 2 Oct 2009, 18:30:16 UTC

Are there any new developments on the ATI GPU front for GPUGRID?
Are there apps based on OpenCL planned in the near future?
Thanks!

GDF said there would be ... I don't know, ooops yes I do: which thread... but it is about here someplace...

Einstein hinted that they have OpenCL in the works too, but it is lagging behind the CUDA version they are working on ... I do not know that there will be a mad rush ... or that this will lead to Mac OpenCL apps at the same time ... but I can hope cause I have a mac that I could run GPUs in too ...
ID: 12985 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile bloodrain

Send message
Joined: 11 Dec 08
Posts: 32
Credit: 748,159
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 17268 - Posted: 24 May 2010, 22:19:26 UTC - in response to Message 7550.  

you nailed it gdf. on what i was going to post.
ID: 17268 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Fred J. Verster

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 09
Posts: 58
Credit: 35,833,978
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 21234 - Posted: 24 May 2011, 23:53:54 UTC - in response to Message 17268.  

And SETI BĂȘta is also testing a MultiBeam app. rev177 & rev.234(?) and a
AstroPulse app. rev521, for ATI cards. The speedgain on AstroPulse is about
10 times less runtime.(CPU time strongly depends on % radar-blanking)
~10% CPU time with 0% radar blanking.

And the Longruns here, just finished 2 of them, also takes 10-12 hours, but
more credit is given compaired to SETI CUDA.

I think the GPUGrid app. makes better use of more advanced architecture of the
FERMI, or compute capabillity 2.0 oor 2.1.




Knight Who Says Ni N!
ID: 21234 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : ATI vs NVIDIA GPUs

©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra