Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
3/16 What version of BOINC are you using?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 15 Feb 09 Posts: 55 Credit: 3,542,733 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I dated it just in case final version of 6.6.x comes out tomorrow, lol. Just curious if anybody has found a version that works properly after 6.5.0. There are 15 versions to choose from, after all. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Feb 09 Posts: 37 Credit: 666,889 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm using 6.6.15 on a 64-bit Linux box (openSuSE 11.1 and KDE 4.2). Nvidia drive 180.37, because 185.13 breaks CUDA. No issues with this driver setup or with BOINC. Mike Doerner |
Paul D. BuckSend message Joined: 9 Jun 08 Posts: 1050 Credit: 37,321,185 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is a rather steady stream of reports on 6.6.15 and its issues... so ... watch it carefully ... |
Dieter MatuschekSend message Joined: 28 Dec 08 Posts: 58 Credit: 231,884,297 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just curious if anybody has found a version that works properly after 6.5.0. I have no issues with 6.6.11 running it since February 25th. (Since today I'm trying 6.6.17) |
|
Send message Joined: 9 Oct 08 Posts: 50 Credit: 12,676,739 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have had used several versions lately and have had good success. I run a quad core with 2xGTX 260 core 216's, a quad core with a single GTX 260 core 216 and a quad core with a 8800GT. All are accepting work, both CPU (WCG only) and GPU based (GPUGRID). The fact that I only run a single CPU project likely explains my positive experiences vs. others that run multiple CPU projects concurrently. My two cents. Crunching for the benefit of humanity and in memory of my dad and other family members. |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Nov 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 50,514,446 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have tried several of the 6.6.xx versions but always go back to 6.5.0 due to multiple problems........... |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Dec 08 Posts: 738 Credit: 200,909,904 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I dated it just in case final version of 6.6.x comes out tomorrow, lol. Just curious if anybody has found a version that works properly after 6.5.0. There are 15 versions to choose from, after all. Well 6.6.15 wasn't too bad. 6.6.17 seems to be better, more agressive about maintaining a cache for cpu work (gpu work has been fine since 15). I think they will be a while before they get a fully functioning one but its slowly getting there. They are still fine tuning the work-fetch side of things. BOINC blog |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Feb 09 Posts: 139 Credit: 575,023 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
For me these newer versions arent very good since i don't want 4 workunits cached because of the slowness of my card. It downloads 4 units even though i had set it not to download new work after i set it not to. But also have problems with other projects which are in my list but set to no new work for instance seti and seti beta where set not to receive work since they crash ps3grid sometimes. Now even though i set it not to receive it still downloaded units and i alos find that even though projects let you choose certain types of units to process they actually just download whatever the project sends. With good old 6.5.0 all seem to work fine and give me the least problems The previous recommended version 6.4.5 and 6.4.7 don't work fine as well but have different issues like not loading optimized applications and such. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Feb 09 Posts: 37 Credit: 666,889 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm now on 6.6.17 on 64-bit linux. The INITIAL download was 4 tasks because I have a quad-core CPU. However, as those tasks have completed, I now only have ONE active task, and I do not receive a new task until it is about 75% complete. So currently, I only have one task, as I only have a 9600 GSO, single card. As I add additional cards to this I'm sure I will get more tasks. Seems to me it's working OK, except the initial download was based on the # of cpu cores, not GPU processors. FWIW. Mike Doerner |
ZydorSend message Joined: 8 Feb 09 Posts: 252 Credit: 1,309,451 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I dated it just in case final version of 6.6.x comes out tomorrow, lol. Just curious if anybody has found a version that works properly after 6.5.0. There are 15 versions to choose from, after all. I'm on 6.5.0 works for me, staying there until a new final release. All the ones after 6.4.7 are Development versions, not for Production use - they are just consolidations of the various development modules as they get to various stages, needing to recompile to move on with development. Use any post- 6.4.7 at own risk - the latter is a statement of the obvious I am aware, but its often forgotten .... Regards Zy |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Webbie, which is the last 6.6.x version which you tried? I'd think they should have fixed this "ignoring no new work" issue by now. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Feb 09 Posts: 139 Credit: 575,023 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
6.6.17 is now being tested |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Switched to BOINC v6.6.17 a few days ago. It's using about 30 minutes of CPU time with my 9600GSO on 2883 point WUs versus about 14 minutes with BOINC v6.6.15. One improvement is that the estimated time to completion now seems fairly accurate. WU fetch is working fine for both the GPU and CPU tasks. The first WU it tried would not start and had to be aborted but the next 4 have been fine. The only real improvement I see is the corrected estimated time. The downside is the greater CPU usage, still not too bad though. Running 5 tasks on a Phenom 9600BE with 9600GSO graphics card... |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Jul 07 Posts: 14 Credit: 9,618,510 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Using 6.6.18 (just started); nothing to report except BM is showing wall time for GPUGrid and estimations are pretty accurate. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra