Extremly "big" WU (when uploading finished WU)

Author	Message
Riil Send message Joined: 26 Dec 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 350,847 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7314 - Posted: 10 Mar 2009, 8:24:03 UTC Hello. Got 10 WUs done so far, but i've seen this kind of situation for the first time. I let work my machine overnight to finish on of my WUs. WU NAME :up2078-SMD_v10b1COM74-0-1-ignasi_0 TASK ID: 374560 WU ID: 283841 WU was crunched correctly. The problem is that this exact part of this WU (up2078-SMD_v10b1COM74-0-1-ignasi_0_4) was "only" 83,13 MB !!! So i don't know if it's OK or not. As far as i remember previous WU werent that big (something like 5MB at most ?) Or maybe recently WUs are that big when uploading result to the server. Any explanation ? Thx in advance ID: 7314 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Scott Brown Send message Joined: 21 Oct 08 Posts: 144 Credit: 2,973,555 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7320 - Posted: 10 Mar 2009, 14:24:03 UTC - in response to Message 7314. Ignasi noted in another thread that some of the SMD type were going to have a much larger size than previous work, so this is probably the case here. ID: 7320 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Riil Send message Joined: 26 Dec 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 350,847 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7323 - Posted: 10 Mar 2009, 19:02:00 UTC - in response to Message 7320. Thx Scott. Found Ignasi's post finally. Seems i was one of these 200 lucky crunchers. ID: 7323 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ignasi Send message Joined: 10 Apr 08 Posts: 254 Credit: 16,836,000 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 7346 - Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 16:11:46 UTC - in response to Message 7323. Yes. Those generating the *_4 file are by that file higher, but definitely it shouldn't be that much. I am looking at it again. Once again, sorry for that. i ID: 7346 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote