I had a hassle with one of my PC's over the last couple of days, that resulted in my aborting a model as there was no way I would meet the deadline, and two falling over with computation error. Got the beast back on track again now.

I am relatively new to GPUGRID, therefore greatful for advice. Its usual with most BOINC apps to give partial credits for time completed in cases where models fall over or end up with a corrupted result, does that happen here? Or is it a case of no result, no credits. There are merits in both approach's, am just curious to know what GPUGRID does in these scenarios.

I had a hassle with one of my PC's over the last couple of days, that resulted in my aborting a model as there was no way I would meet the deadline, and two falling over with computation error. Got the beast back on track again now.

I am relatively new to GPUGRID, therefore greatful for advice. Its usual with most BOINC apps to give partial credits for time completed in cases where models fall over or end up with a corrupted result, does that happen here? Or is it a case of no result, no credits. There are merits in both approach's, am just curious to know what GPUGRID does in these scenarios.

In that the models take (in general) less than a day on even the slowest recommended cards the award is only for successful models.

On a project like CPDN where weeks are required the other award system makes more sense.

Fair enough - many thanks :)