Message boards :
Number crunching :
my deadline is getting closer, please give me more time
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 7 Nov 21 Posts: 8 Credit: 145,802,834 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
The GTX 1660 Super specs say that it has 14 Gbps of memory bandwidth and the Ti has 12 Gbps. Tullio's post makes it sound like memory speed may be a bottleneck. |
|
Send message Joined: 13 Dec 17 Posts: 1419 Credit: 9,119,446,190 RAC: 731 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If the CUDA core count was the same I would say that yes the Super would be faster because of the higher clocked memory. But CUDA core count comes first in determining the speed of the applications here at GPUGrid. Second would be the card bandwidth and as long as you run a card in X8 or faster is marginal difference. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 20 Posts: 1116 Credit: 40,839,470,595 RAC: 5,269 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
The GTX 1660 Super specs say that it has 14 Gbps of memory bandwidth and the Ti has 12 Gbps. Tullio's post makes it sound like memory speed may be a bottleneck. memory is not a big bottleneck for GPUGRID. Tullio is incorrect.
|
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra