Message boards :
Number crunching :
What is 195 (0xc3) EXIT_CHILD_FAILED
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 20 Jul 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 5,450,108,679 RAC: 4,361 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This task has run until end, when finishing, it throwed this error: 195 (0xc3) EXIT_CHILD_FAILED <core_client_version>7.16.11</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> (unknown error) - exit code 195 (0xc3)</message> <stderr_txt> 11:55:20 (4072): wrapper (7.9.26016): starting 11:55:20 (4072): wrapper: running acemd3.exe (--boinc input --device 0) Detected memory leaks! http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=32585300 Supporting BOINC, a great concept ! |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 20 Posts: 1116 Credit: 40,839,470,595 RAC: 6,423 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Don’t worry about the memory leaks message. It’s harmless, the Windows app always shows this. The source of your failure is further down: 07:55:53 (6200): wrapper (7.9.26016): starting I’d suspect either somethig wrong with the card, or a problem with the drivers.
|
|
Send message Joined: 9 May 21 Posts: 16 Credit: 1,435,881,404 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
All 6 of my latest tasks finished with EXIT_CHILD_FAILED WU ran for only a few seconds |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 428 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
All 6 of my latest tasks finished with EXIT_CHILD_FAILED In your case, the actual error number is app exit status: 0xc0000135which officially means 'status_dll_not_found'. See the thread New version tasks failing on Windows hosts (in the GPU area), and specifically message 57353, where user jjch gives instructions for installing a missing Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable. |
|
Send message Joined: 22 May 20 Posts: 110 Credit: 115,525,136 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
I do have the same error reported on the first task that I got in months. However the app exit status says 0x1. The corresponding task stderr file reports that ACEMD failed: Particle coordinate is nan What might have caused this? This is my Host and that is said Task. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 428 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Bad data in the task files. Unless your GPU is so superheated that it can't do maths any more, there's nothing you can do. |
|
Send message Joined: 22 May 20 Posts: 110 Credit: 115,525,136 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
All right! Thanks Richard for the blazing fast response. Card is running at a mild 53-55 degree Celsius so that is unlikely the culprit. Already feared that there's nothing I can do... |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If I consider the contents of your post in the hardware enthusiast corner, I would say that the reason for the NAN (Not A Number) error in your case is undervolting your GPU.All right! Thanks Richard for the blazing fast response. Card is running at a mild 53-55 degree Celsius so that is unlikely the culprit. Already feared that there's nothing I can do...I do have the same error reported on the first task that I got in months. However the app exit status says 0x1.Bad data in the task files. Unless your GPU is so superheated that it can't do maths any more, there's nothing you can do. |
|
Send message Joined: 22 May 20 Posts: 110 Credit: 115,525,136 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
I think that you might have been right Zoltan! Haven't been running any GPU Grid tasks for several months now and just ran with the same OC settings that proved to be working with other projects in the past... And I forgot that those tasks here are extremely demanding and power hungry, so much though that the power limit on my card (100W out of 125W) didn't cut it. Core clock boost behaviour was erratic and due to the low power limit the voltage dropped quite severely as a result of that. When you wrote your comment here, I had already withdrawn the PL on my card to get better boost behaviour. But with your explanation I now know that voltages dropped so low (~ 910mV) that the computation became unstable. Now it is running at a 1,000-1,025mV range using up to 135W at times. Thanks for your valuable comment! |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra