New D3RBanditTest workunits
Message boards :
News :
New D3RBanditTest workunits
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 14 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level  Scientific publications  
|
I have a 1660 super that takes about 34-38 hours on these new units, still seeing temps in the 60s, only uses 15% of gpu in task manager thoClick on the GPU graph on the left pane, then on the right pane select "Cuda" instead of "3D" on the top left subgraph. |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level Scientific publications
|
It just dawned on me that these WUs might be an experiment in having the same host perform all the generations of the model simulation consecutively instead of on different hosts. Or am I way off?You are right, this bacth consists of threads having only one single, but very long generation, making a single workunit the whole thread of the batch. It's not an experiment, as this is not the first time to issue such a batch in GPUGrid's history. In this way the progress of a batch is much faster, as the project doesn't have to wait for many*5 days for a thread to finish. As the workunits get assigned randomly to hosts, it's sure that some of the generations of a multiple generation long simulation will be assigned to slow or unreliable hosts, this will add significant latency for completing a single thread of a simulation. |
 Send message Joined: 12 Jul 17 Posts: 404 Credit: 17,408,899,587 RAC: 2 Level Scientific publications 
|
Sorry, I took the last cookie... ;-) |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 20 Posts: 1114 Credit: 40,838,722,595 RAC: 4,266,994 Level Scientific publications 
|
Sorry, I took the last cookie... ;-) don't worry, in 4-5 days there will be plenty more resends available from all the hit-n-runs and systems that are too slow. 
|
|
Send message Joined: 14 Mar 20 Posts: 7 Credit: 11,283,596 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications 
|
These tasks are too big for my 1050ti :( 30 times bigger than previous MDAD tasks! I think I have to go to Folding@home until GG have smaller WU. F@h have small WU relate to covid-19.About 40min in my 1050 ti |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 869 Level Scientific publications  
|
in 4-5 days there will be plenty more resends available from all the hit-n-runs and systems that are too slow. but this cannot be the purpose of the exercise, or can it? |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 20 Posts: 1114 Credit: 40,838,722,595 RAC: 4,266,994 Level Scientific publications
|
looks like some new tasks are being loaded up. I've received several _0s they're labelled batch0, so maybe some tasks that had too many errors that needed to be resent manually as new tasks?
|
 Send message Joined: 13 Dec 17 Posts: 1416 Credit: 9,119,446,190 RAC: 614,515 Level  Scientific publications
|
I've got some of these new batch0 tasks too. |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 79 Credit: 210,528,292 RAC: 148 Level  Scientific publications
|
I have CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 1650 (driver version 461.40, CUDA version 11.2, compute capability 7.5, 4096MB, 3327MB available, 2849 GFLOPS peak) and https://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=32538103 estimates two days to finish |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 13 Posts: 79 Credit: 210,528,292 RAC: 148 Level Scientific publications
|
Hours? |
|
Send message Joined: 23 Dec 09 Posts: 189 Credit: 4,798,881,008 RAC: 311 Level  Scientific publications
|
|
|
Send message Joined: 20 Feb 21 Posts: 1 Credit: 35,558,000 RAC: 697,839 Level  Scientific publications
|
RTX3090 just repeats Computation error. |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level Scientific publications
|
RTX3090 just repeats Computation error.As yet, the RTX 3xxx series is not supported by GPUGrid. If you own such a card, please set "No new tasks" for GPUGrid until further notice. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 20 Posts: 1114 Credit: 40,838,722,595 RAC: 4,266,994 Level Scientific publications
|
I have CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 1650 (driver version 461.40, CUDA version 11.2, compute capability 7.5, 4096MB, 3327MB available, 2849 GFLOPS peak) This is normal for that GPU. These tasks are very long and that GPU is pretty weak.
|
|
Send message Joined: 4 Mar 18 Posts: 53 Credit: 2,815,476,011 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications
|
Seeking some help if possible. I have had only one of the new work units download to my computer on 15 Feb. Unfortunately, it was interrupted by a power loss in my area, and when power came back on I discovered the Nvidia driver had somehow been corrupted. After the fix, the WU ended up with a compute error. The problem is that since then I have not received any more WUs, either automatically or during mulitple Updates in BOINC. Can someone look at my computer and see what I may have set wrong (driver etc) that may be preventing me getting work units? I have checked what my limited knowledge allows. Thank you for any help. EDIT: Computer with the Nvidia 1080. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 20 Posts: 1114 Credit: 40,838,722,595 RAC: 4,266,994 Level Scientific publications
|
It appears that the drivers are not installed correctly. No driver is reported by BOINC. Driver version being available via BOINC is important here at GPUGRID because the project needs to know that you are using a compatible driver to send you work units. So I would totally remove your drivers and completely reinstall them fresh
|
|
Send message Joined: 4 Mar 18 Posts: 53 Credit: 2,815,476,011 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
Thank you! It worked. Odd, since it was working on Einstein. Just for my ongoing learning, where did you see that no driver was being reported to GPUGRID? Again, thank you for your help. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 20 Posts: 1114 Credit: 40,838,722,595 RAC: 4,266,994 Level Scientific publications
|
If you look at your host details here: http://www.gpugrid.net/hosts_user.php?userid=524258 You can see in the section showing your GPU, below it lists the driver in use. When I looked at it before, no driver was listed. It was just blank. Einstein’s apps are openCL and really only need the openCL portion of the drivers, which you must have had installed, just some problem with the proprietary drivers I guess. You did say you had some driver corruption so it’s hard to say exactly what happened.
|
|
Send message Joined: 26 May 20 Posts: 4 Credit: 187,447,627 RAC: 3,630 Level  Scientific publications
|
My ole Nvidia 1080 is turning new WU's around in about 25 hours. On another host my brand new Gigabyte RTX3070 is patiently waiting to do some real work on GPUGrid. I daresay that it would be crunching these WU's a lot quicker and more efficiently. So I'm stuck with F@H for the new sports car. Hopefully a short term problem. |
 Send message Joined: 8 Aug 19 Posts: 252 Credit: 458,054,251 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications
|
So I'm stuck with F@H for the new sports car. You might not consider yourself as having been 'stuck' if your host tests the candidate that turns out to be the magic bullet for curing COVID-19. You can also brag that you are a part of the world's largest supercomputer when you crunch for Greg. 2.8 million "donors" and rising. If you're a "points person" you'll be gratified by the very generous credit they award there, even though it's not BOINC applicable. Too bad Bowman Lab and FAH left the Berkley format IMO (I dislike all things proprietary), but the COVID moonshot is too important not to participate in, as a cruncher who is focused on promoting science which is urgently relevant. I just remind myself that this is not all about me. Together we crunch To check out a hunch, But wish that our credit Would just buy our lunch. (traditional) |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra