New D3RBanditTest workunits
Message boards :
News :
New D3RBanditTest workunits
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 9 Dec 08 Posts: 1006 Credit: 5,068,599 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications    |
Dears, as you may have noticed, we sent a new batch of WUs for a new experiment. This time the WUs are rather large and require relatively new cards. For reference, should be ~18h on a 1080 Ti. Thanks! T |
 Send message Joined: 7 Apr 11 Posts: 6 Credit: 92,079,090 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications
|
For (quick/rough) reference... My 2080 32522050 27029714 574925 13 Feb 2021 | 18:06:08 UTC 15 Feb 2021 | 09:28:47 UTC Completed and validated 49,391.24 48,091.83 435,937.50 New version of ACEMD v2.11 (cuda101) 32522013 27029677 574925 13 Feb 2021 | 18:06:08 UTC 14 Feb 2021 | 14:15:47 UTC Completed and validated 50,192.08 48,998.63 523,125.00 New version of ACEMD v2.11 (cuda101) My 1080 32521736 27029492 233256 13 Feb 2021 | 13:53:06 UTC 14 Feb 2021 | 13:35:25 UTC Completed and validated 84,623.21 84,006.91 523,125.00 New version of ACEMD v2.11 (cuda101) Life's short; make fun of it! |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Nov 09 Posts: 3 Credit: 65,514,463 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications 
|
It would be nice if you at least gave a longer Deadline. I only got a GTX1070 and many other got ever weaker GPUs. TIA |
|
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 1,844,462 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications 
|
Yup, my old GT730 is out, take too much time. Unless the deadline have more days I stop accepting WU. Good luck for the rest and happy crunching :) |
|
Send message Joined: 15 Jul 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 8,228,133 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
Hi All! This WU took already 7 hours and total time is estimated for 38 hours on Mobile 2070 RTX. Newest drivers, i7 9th. Is it proper estimate? If so, I won't make it into the deadline :(. Regards! |
 Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level  Scientific publications 
|
This WU took already 7 hours and total time is estimated for 38 hours on Mobile 2070 RTX. Newest drivers, i7 9th.Yes. These workunits are very long. If so, I won't make it into the deadlineSet a low cache (0+0 days, or 0.01+0 days). You should abort them. (at least the one which didn't start yet) If you want to meet the 5 days deadline, you should let your laptop crunch for 24/7. If you don't want that, then you should set GPUGrid to "no new tasks" for a while (until this batch is over). |
|
Send message Joined: 16 May 13 Posts: 41 Credit: 145,731,947 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications 
|
My GTX 780 did it in ~ 50h. No chance for my GT 710 which runs 24/7 for boinc in my server. |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Mar 20 Posts: 1 Credit: 8,671,465 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
I received a new workunit on Feb 10. Deadline is today. Stats show 32% readiness after 22.5 hours of GPU use. 48 more hours of GPU time is required to finish. Not practical and not doable for me. With such unit size and deadline combination I can certainly find better use for my GPU resources somewhere else. |
 Send message Joined: 17 Feb 09 Posts: 91 Credit: 1,603,303,394 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications 
|
I completed two running concurrently same machine on two GTX1060's in about 36.4 - 36.5 hours. Running two more about 30% completed in about 10 hours so far. Not too bad for lower end cards. |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Apr 20 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,219,253 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
Sadly the deadline on the tasks is less than the amount of time it will take to complete it. |
|
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
It should take about 50 hours on my GTX 1650. Tullio |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Mar 20 Posts: 14 Credit: 3,127,716 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
Hello, I have the same problem. How could we be on time ? https://ibb.co/82f8Sn0 Please don't get into the game of planned obsolete by forcing users to change their hardware. You will inevitably gain so many time if we are more to calculate your work units. Please JUST give us more time to complet WUs. Wilgard |
|
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
Funnily, it seems to be much faster on this PC with the GTX 1060 than on the other PC with the GTX 1650. They have different CPUs, this one an AMD Ryzen 5 1400 and the other an Intel i5 9400F. Does this make the difference? Tullio |
|
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
Sorry, after a fast start to 10% the task went back to 0.66%. It seemed too good to be true. Tullio |
ServicEnginIC Send message Joined: 24 Sep 10 Posts: 592 Credit: 11,972,186,510 RAC: 1,102,898 Level Scientific publications
|
after a fast start to 10% the task went back to 0.66%. That seems to be the normal behavior for this current batch of ADRIA WUs. In BOINC Manager, when the task has reached stability at its low progress rate, if you click over the task and then in "Properties", the GTX 1650 graphics card should indicate some value around 2.160% per hour. You can do the same with the GTX 1060 to compare values. The higher the progress rate, the lower will be the completion time. |
 Send message Joined: 8 Aug 19 Posts: 252 Credit: 458,054,251 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications
|
I completed two running concurrently same machine on two GTX1060's in about 36.4 - 36.5 hours. Running two more about 30% completed in about 10 hours so far. Not too bad for lower end cards. My GTX 1060 3GB cards take ~40 hrs. My GTX 1650s need about 45 hrs. My GTX 750ti should have finished in 100 hrs, but I found it stalled (not drawing any power, even though it showed 99% usage) and after I paused and restarted it it never got back up to 1%/hr. It needs 1 hour more than the 120 hr window provides. I'll try again with it overclocked gently. Please may we have a 144hr window of expiration so everybody gets a chance to crunch. For now there is work for older cards and AMD GPUs at FAH/COVID moonshot. https://foldingathome.org/ |
|
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
The progress on GTX 1650 is 2,160%/hour ; for GTX 1060 is 2,160%/hour. This seems to agree with my observations.The 1060 has only 3 GB of video memory, which was not sufficient for same Einstein@home gravitational waves task. The 1650 has 4 GB.These tasks use only 667 MB memory. Tullio |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Mar 20 Posts: 14 Credit: 3,127,716 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications
|
For now there is work for older cards and AMD GPUs at FAH/COVID moonshot. But it is not BOINC, that is the main issue in my case |
|
Send message Joined: 31 Oct 10 Posts: 1 Credit: 4,557 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications
|
What is a "18h on a 1080 Ti". |
 Send message Joined: 13 Dec 17 Posts: 1416 Credit: 9,119,446,190 RAC: 678,713 Level  Scientific publications
|
Typical D3RBanditTest workunits will take 18 hours or 65,000 seconds to calculate and return a result on a Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti video card. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra