First hello, im crunching for the TSBT ,I'm getting errors probably 1 in 5 of the wu's here is one of the messages:
<core_client_version>7.14.2</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
(unknown error) - exit code 195 (0xc3)</message>
<stderr_txt>
16:47:24 (2960): wrapper (7.9.26016): starting
16:47:24 (2960): wrapper: running acemd3.exe (--boinc input --device 0)
# Engine failed: Particle coordinate is nan
16:50:06 (2960): acemd3.exe exited; CPU time 160.390625
16:50:06 (2960): app exit status: 0x1
16:50:06 (2960): called boinc_finish(195)
0 bytes in 0 Free Blocks.
434 bytes in 8 Normal Blocks.
1144 bytes in 1 CRT Blocks.
0 bytes in 0 Ignore Blocks.
0 bytes in 0 Client Blocks.
Largest number used: 0 bytes.
Total allocations: 1685764 bytes.

I could give you the full dump detail if needed.
My rig is i9 9900k & rtx 2080, 16gb 4000mhz mem, WIN 10 PRO

# Engine failed: Particle coordinate is nan

Unless the task itself is misformulated, and you can check with others running the same series, the error says the card made a math error.

Too far overclocked or not enough cooling and the card is running hot.

Temps not an issue will try lowering the clocks cheers

Is it normal for the credits to be much lower than with the old version?

Is it normal for the credits to be much lower than with the old version?

Yes, the credit awarded is scaled to the GFLOPS required to crunch the task or roughly equivalent to the time it takes to crunch.

The old tasks with the old app ran for several more hours apiece compared to the current work.

Temps not an issue will try lowering the clocks cheers

Seems to have worked cheers funny though benchmarked the card played games and crunched on other projects with no issue but no errors so far so good!

Is it normal for the credits to be much lower than with the old version?

Yes, the credit awarded is scaled to the GFLOPS required to crunch the task or roughly equivalent to the time it takes to crunch.

The old tasks with the old app ran for several more hours apiece compared to the current work.

Yes, I understand shorter work units will grant less credit, I meant during the course of a day. I am getting roughly half or less PPD than with the older longer units.

The old MDAD WUs miscalculated credits.

The old MDAD WUs miscalculated credits.

Are those the old ACEMD Long Runs WU's? I am getting about half as much PPD on the New Version of ACEMD vs the Long Runs wu's on the previous version.

The old MDAD WUs miscalculated credits.

Are those the old ACEMD Long Runs WU's? I am getting about half as much PPD on the New Version of ACEMD vs the Long Runs wu's on the previous version.

No, completely different application and different tasks. No relationship to previous work.

The old MDAD WUs miscalculated credits.

...But it was fun while it lasted! 💸📈

The old MDAD WUs miscalculated credits.

Are those the old ACEMD Long Runs WU's? I am getting about half as much PPD on the New Version of ACEMD vs the Long Runs wu's on the previous version.

No, completely different application and different tasks. No relationship to previous work.

So it is normal to get fewer credits per day than with the old Long run WU's? I am just wondering if I am the only one, thats all.

The old MDAD WUs miscalculated credits.

Are those the old ACEMD Long Runs WU's? I am getting about half as much PPD on the New Version of ACEMD vs the Long Runs wu's on the previous version.

No, completely different application and different tasks. No relationship to previous work.

So it is normal to get fewer credits per day than with the old Long run WU's? I am just wondering if I am the only one, thats all.

Yes.

Hello,

I have just add GPUGRID as a new projet in BOINC.
But the client cannot get new WUs.
The server status as WUs available.


https://i.ibb.co/827wQZN/GPUGRID-server-status.jpg


As you can see in my logs file

04/03/2020 14:36:06 |  | Fetching configuration file from http://www.gpugrid.net/get_project_config.php
04/03/2020 14:36:49 | GPUGRID | Master file download succeeded
04/03/2020 14:36:54 | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: Project initialization.
04/03/2020 14:36:54 | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA GPU and Intel GPU
04/03/2020 14:36:56 | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
04/03/2020 14:36:56 | GPUGRID | No tasks sent
04/03/2020 14:36:58 | GPUGRID | Started download of logogpugrid.png
04/03/2020 14:36:58 | GPUGRID | Started download of project_1.png
04/03/2020 14:36:58 | GPUGRID | Started download of project_2.png
04/03/2020 14:36:58 | GPUGRID | Started download of project_3.png
04/03/2020 14:36:59 | GPUGRID | Finished download of logogpugrid.png
04/03/2020 14:36:59 | GPUGRID | Finished download of project_1.png
04/03/2020 14:36:59 | GPUGRID | Finished download of project_2.png
04/03/2020 14:36:59 | GPUGRID | Finished download of project_3.png
04/03/2020 14:37:31 | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
04/03/2020 14:37:31 | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA GPU and Intel GPU
04/03/2020 14:37:32 | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
04/03/2020 14:37:32 | GPUGRID | No tasks sent

Do you have any idea ?


Best Regards,

Wilgard

I have just add GPUGRID as a new projet in BOINC.
But the client cannot get new WUs.
The server status as WUs available.

Check your card and drivers. One or both may be too old.
http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=5002#52865

looks like Windows only has CUDA92 and CUDA101 apps. his driver version (382.xx) is only compatible with CUDA80.

for the CUDA92 app you need driver 396.26+
for the CUDA101 app you need driver 418.39+

CUDA80 apps exist for Linux, however.

Wilgard,

probably best to update the drivers to the latest if you want to stick to Windows, you have CUDA 10+ drivers available for that Quadro M520 you have.

I am really imppresed. That was the issue I had.
My NVIDIA driver was in 382.29 and after an update it is in 422.50
So now IT WORKS !!
Many thanks "Jim1348" and "Ian&Steve C."

Best Regards,

Wilgard