Message boards :
Server and website :
Unable to load units
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 4 Jun 15 Posts: 19 Credit: 8,949,558,416 RAC: 340,932 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Some WU's have downloaded veeeeery slowly. This seems to affect only my single Windows box, not Linux boxes (three Linuxes on same network with Win10). My Win10 usually works like this: Task / WU / Sent / Reported / Status / Run time / CPU time / Credit / App 21568109 / 16907517 / 16 Dec 2019 | 17:48:59 UTC / 16 Dec 2019 | 21:19:01 UTC / Completed and validated / 7,958.60 / 7,862.38 / 91,500.00 / New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101) but when downloading starts to take time, tasks start to look like this: 21568706 / 16908048 / 17 Dec 2019 | 5:42:39 UTC / 19 Dec 2019 | 7:42:10 UTC / Completed and validated / 7,959.27 / 7,860.33 / 61,000.00 / New version of ACEMD v2.10 (cuda101) If I recall correctly, suspended download retry time is something like several hours. If I manually request it to continue, it usually advances normally. Is there a way to edit download properties somewhere to get the retry interval shorter? Br, Jukka |
|
Send message Joined: 13 Dec 17 Posts: 1424 Credit: 9,189,946,190 RAC: 8 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is there a way to edit download properties somewhere to get the retry interval shorter? No. The server sets the backoff interval. Not the client. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is there a way to edit download properties somewhere to get the retry interval shorter? That's a different backoff (scheduler for update / request work, not download). The client sets the download backoff, and it starts small with the first failure, then gets longer after each attempt: the idea is to reduce congestion if it's a general problem and everyone starts hammering on the server at once. To reach an elapsed time of 50 hours instead of 4 hours, there must have been multiple failures (they'll be in your Event Log). One observation I have with multiple Windows machines is that the GPUGrid server doesn't like it when different computers try to connect from the same LAN / IP address in quick succession. It only takes a couple of minutes to clear, but it's very annoying: just had it at the beginning of this forum session. I can only suggest that you check the Win 10 download status any time you happen to be passing: click update on any stalled download, and keep clicking until all the stalled files have transferred. |
|
Send message Joined: 13 Dec 17 Posts: 1424 Credit: 9,189,946,190 RAC: 8 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
One observation I have with multiple Windows machines is that the GPUGrid server doesn't like it when different computers try to connect from the same LAN / IP address in quick succession. It only takes a couple of minutes to clear, but it's very annoying: just had it at the beginning of this forum session. Thanks for that observation. And the client correction. I wondered if it was just me or does everyone have that problem of multiple hosts trying to connect from the same LAN IP address range and the schedulers just ignoring the host request. I've learned to wait a couple of minutes after a host has had the double scheduler connect and gone quiescent again before I attempt an update on another host. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
+1One observation I have with multiple Windows machines is that the GPUGrid server doesn't like it when different computers try to connect from the same LAN / IP address in quick succession. It only takes a couple of minutes to clear, but it's very annoying: just had it at the beginning of this forum session. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
+1One observation I have with multiple Windows machines is that the GPUGrid server doesn't like it when different computers try to connect from the same LAN / IP address in quick succession. It only takes a couple of minutes to clear, but it's very annoying: just had it at the beginning of this forum session. +1 |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Oct 13 Posts: 53 Credit: 406,647,419 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Same here... 27.12.2019 08:39:38 | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA GPU 27.12.2019 08:39:41 | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 27.12.2019 08:39:42 | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. 27.12.2019 08:40:00 | GPUGRID | Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server 27.12.2019 08:40:01 | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 27.12.2019 08:40:02 | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Same here... The GPUGRID server as well as the website were down this morning for some short time. But everything okay since then. |
|
Send message Joined: 10 Nov 13 Posts: 101 Credit: 15,776,211,122 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Only a few of the Xeon E3 - V2, V5 and V6's include the integrated Intel P4000, HD P530 or Iris Pro P580 graphics. https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/guides/hd-graphics-p530-p580-performance-guide.pdf |
ServicEnginICSend message Joined: 24 Sep 10 Posts: 595 Credit: 13,083,686,510 RAC: 2,983,710 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
One observation I have with multiple Windows machines is that the GPUGrid server doesn't like it when different computers try to connect from the same LAN / IP address in quick succession. It only takes a couple of minutes to clear, but it's very annoying: just had it at the beginning of this forum session. +1 It affects not only to scheduler requests, but also to the other GPUGrid's Web services. Example: One of my hosts has recently asked for new tasks, and I try to access GPUGrid's webpage from another host in the same network, then access will not be possible until a certain delay is past. Possibly it is due to some DoS (Denial of Service attack) protection running on GPUGrid's server or firewall. It's been commented in some other posts like this: It's not just the speed. Edit: Second example: I've had to publish this post twice, with a pause in between. First time was not attended by server... |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra