Hi,
I'm not sure how the deadline is counted. I can't find it now but there was written somewhere on the website that the deadline is extended at 50% for every day-after-day when your computer crunches. So if I crunched for 4 days and my deadline was 10.09 why on 13.09 is "too late for validate"? I'd really like to understand it.
I'm sorry for mistakes, I'm not native.

I'm not sure how the deadline is counted.

That's quite simple: the deadline is 5 days for the GPU workunits.

I can't find it now but there was written somewhere on the website that the deadline is extended at 50% for every day-after-day when your computer crunches.

You're mixing two different things here:
The daily quota of tasks is increased by 1 after every successful task.
The granted credit has 50% bonus for returning the result within 1 day.
The granted credit has 25% bonus for returning the result within 2 days.

The daily quota of tasks is increased by 1 after every successful task.

up to which limit?

The daily quota of tasks is increased by 1 after every successful task.

up to which limit?

There is no limit however, it doesn't make a difference because as soon as you send an errored unit the number will come crashing down to 10

---

Radio Caroline, the world's most famous offshore pirate radio station.
Great music since April 1964. Support Radio Caroline Team -
Radio Caroline

This work Unit was listed as #1 for TIMESTAMP accomplishment under PERFORMANCE
today; obviously the deadline was extended hundreds or thousands of times. After all today is 3 December 2019!!!! Wow. I must be missing something here.
Name
9_12_17_20_19-NATHAN_CMYB_equil3-0-1-RND7503_0
Workunit
5401029
Created
25 Mar 2014 | 14:35:51 UTC
Sent
25 Mar 2014 | 18:29:02 UTC
Received
30 Mar 2014 | 8:29:50 UTC
Server state
Over
Outcome
Success
Client state
Done
Exit status
0 (0x0)
Computer ID
169689
Report deadline
30 Mar 2014 | 18:29:02 UTC
Run time
2,016.14
CPU time
380.80
Validate state
Valid
Credit
2,375.00
Application version
Short runs (2-3 hours on fastest card) v8.20 (cuda60)
Stderr output
<core_client_version>7.2.42</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# GPU [GeForce GTX 770] Platform [Windows] Rev [3301M] VERSION [60]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 770
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 2048MB
# Capability : 3.0
# PCI ID : 0000:01:00.0
# Device clock : 1084MHz
# Memory clock : 3505MHz
# Memory width : 256bit
# Driver version : r334_89 : 33523
# GPU 0 : 77C
# GPU 0 : 78C
# GPU 0 : 79C
# GPU 0 : 80C
# Time per step (avg over 500000 steps): 3.955 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 1977.559 s
03:31:08 (3932): called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

# GPU 0 : 77C
# GPU 0 : 78C
# GPU 0 : 79C
# GPU 0 : 80C

just a side question, out of interest: I know that the GTX770 is card which gets rather hot.
The temperatures cited above are your "regular" crunching temperatures? For how long has the card been working with these temps? For several years?

This work Unit was listed as #1 for TIMESTAMP accomplishment under PERFORMANCE
today; obviously the deadline was extended hundreds or thousands of times. After all today is 3 December 2019!!!! Wow. I must be missing something here.

               Name 9_12_17_20_19-NATHAN_CMYB_equil3-0-1-RND7503_0
           Workunit 5401029
            Created 25 Mar 2014 | 14:35:51 UTC
               Sent 25 Mar 2014 | 18:29:02 UTC
           Received 30 Mar 2014 | 8:29:50 UTC
       Server state Over
            Outcome Success
       Client state Done
        Exit status 0 (0x0) 
        Computer ID 169689
    Report deadline 30 Mar 2014 | 18:29:02 UTC
           Run time 2,016.14
           CPU time 380.80
     Validate state Valid
             Credit 2,375.00
Application version Short runs (2-3 hours on fastest card) v8.20 (cuda60)

If you compare the "Sent" and "Report Deadline" date, you can see that the deadline was exactly 5 days. The "Received" date tells that the workunit was received 10 hours before the deadline.
Showing this workunit on the performance page is obviously due to an error, as it should show results of the "Long" workunits (this one is a "Short" wu) from the last week (not from more than 5 years ago).

Performance tab is currently in the need to be rebuilt...
https://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=5025

Performance tab is currently in the need to be rebuilt...
https://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=5025

Noted

Gentlemen/ladies! Kindly look at the time stamps on the referenced task:
The Created date WAS 2014; THE Sent date was 2014; The Received date was 2014.

The year Today is 2019!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here is the computer performance graphic I refer to which I copy and pasted from the GPUGrid home page under the PERFORMANCE tab (scroll down to bottom right) that lists 21 tasks in order of GPU performance ratings.

On rechecking, the complete graphic is based on 2014 data.



Rank
User name
Task id
Timestamp (h)
GPU description
1
Shamu
8065768
0.56
AMD Hawaii (3072MB)

Gentlemen/ladies! Kindly look at the time stamps on the referenced task:
The Created date WAS 2014; THE Sent date was 2014; The Received date was 2014.

The year Today is 2019!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As has been explained to you,the Performance page is FUBAR and meaningless. Bad data inexplicably retrieved from the ancient bowels of the project.

The page needs to be rebuilt for the current project.

ME culpable!

Are we still getting the bonus points for a 1 or 2 day return?

Are we still getting the bonus points for a 1 or 2 day return?

Yes