QC tests for windows

Message boards : Multicore CPUs : QC tests for windows
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 8 · Next

AuthorMessage
Bedrich Hajek

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 490
Credit: 11,850,145,728
RAC: 1,299
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51259 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 23:36:28 UTC

I received the second batch of Quantum Chemistry, beta test v3.33 (mt) for Windows today, except for 2 errors (so far), they are finishing successfully.

http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=263612&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=35


I also get this message in the Stderr output:

==> WARNING: A newer version of conda exists. <==
current version: 4.5.4
latest version: 4.5.12

http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=20150516


ID: 51259 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
captainjack

Send message
Joined: 9 May 13
Posts: 171
Credit: 4,739,796,466
RAC: 1,441
Level
Arg
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51260 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 23:41:41 UTC

Got the following error message for a Windows QC_beta task:

16:34:31 (7484): wrapper: running .\qmml3\python.exe (run.py)
Detected memory leaks!
Dumping objects ->
..\api\boinc_api.cpp(309) : {1788} normal block at 0x0000022AE7E17A40, 8 bytes long.
Data: < * > 00 00 DC E7 2A 02 00 00
..\lib\diagnostics_win.cpp(417) : {555} normal block at 0x0000022AE7E40000, 1080 bytes long.
Data: < > 98 14 00 00 CD CD CD CD E4 01 00 00 00 00 00 00
..\zip\boinc_zip.cpp(122) : {294} normal block at 0x0000022AE7DFF750, 260 bytes long.
Data: < > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
{280} normal block at 0x0000022AE7DF99D0, 55 bytes long.
Data: < o > 01 00 00 00 6F 00 CD CD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
{275} normal block at 0x0000022AE7E1BCE0, 44 bytes long.
Data: < * > 01 00 00 00 00 00 CD CD 01 BD E1 E7 2A 02 00 00
{270} normal block at 0x0000022AE7E1BE30, 43 bytes long.
Data: < Q * > 01 00 00 00 00 00 CD CD 51 BE E1 E7 2A 02 00 00
{265} normal block at 0x0000022AE7E1BC00, 44 bytes long.
Data: < ! * > 01 00 00 00 00 00 CD CD 21 BC E1 E7 2A 02 00 00
{260} normal block at 0x0000022AE7E1C1B0, 44 bytes long.
Data: < * > 01 00 00 00 00 00 CD CD D1 C1 E1 E7 2A 02 00 00
Object dump complete.

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Looks like it ran for ~61 minutes before it croaked.
Please let me know if you need more information.
ID: 51260 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Bedrich Hajek

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 490
Credit: 11,850,145,728
RAC: 1,299
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51271 - Posted: 11 Jan 2019, 7:03:19 UTC - in response to Message 51259.  

I received the second batch of Quantum Chemistry, beta test v3.33 (mt) for Windows today, except for 2 errors (so far), they are finishing successfully.

http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=263612&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=35


I also get this message in the Stderr output:

==> WARNING: A newer version of conda exists. <==
current version: 4.5.4
latest version: 4.5.12

http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=20150516




I am still getting the 196 (0xc4) EXIT_DISK_LIMIT_EXCEEDED errors even with disc usage space for boincs set at 500 gigs.





ID: 51271 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 10 Sep 10
Posts: 164
Credit: 388,132
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 51275 - Posted: 11 Jan 2019, 10:55:37 UTC

My first Windows wu:
195 (0xc3) EXIT_CHILD_FAILED

11:18:52 (12032): install_miniconda.bat exited; CPU time 99.796875
11:18:52 (12032): wrapper: running .\qmml3\python.exe (run.py)
PSIO_ERROR: unit = 97, errval = 12
PSIO_ERROR: 12 (error writing to file)
11:44:45 (12032): .\qmml3\python.exe exited; CPU time 4998.312500
11:44:45 (12032): app exit status: 0xc0000409
11:44:45 (12032): called boinc_finish(195)
0 bytes in 0 Free Blocks.
396 bytes in 4 Normal Blocks.
1144 bytes in 1 CRT Blocks.
0 bytes in 0 Ignore Blocks.
0 bytes in 0 Client Blocks.
Largest number used: 0 bytes.
Total allocations: 22092877 bytes.
ID: 51275 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Bedrich Hajek

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 490
Credit: 11,850,145,728
RAC: 1,299
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51276 - Posted: 11 Jan 2019, 12:27:16 UTC - in response to Message 51275.  

My first Windows wu:
195 (0xc3) EXIT_CHILD_FAILED

11:18:52 (12032): install_miniconda.bat exited; CPU time 99.796875
11:18:52 (12032): wrapper: running .\qmml3\python.exe (run.py)
PSIO_ERROR: unit = 97, errval = 12
PSIO_ERROR: 12 (error writing to file)
11:44:45 (12032): .\qmml3\python.exe exited; CPU time 4998.312500
11:44:45 (12032): app exit status: 0xc0000409
11:44:45 (12032): called boinc_finish(195)
0 bytes in 0 Free Blocks.
396 bytes in 4 Normal Blocks.
1144 bytes in 1 CRT Blocks.
0 bytes in 0 Ignore Blocks.
0 bytes in 0 Client Blocks.
Largest number used: 0 bytes.
Total allocations: 22092877 bytes.


Same here, I had a few those errors.



ID: 51276 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 12
Posts: 819
Credit: 1,591,285,971
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51277 - Posted: 11 Jan 2019, 14:22:18 UTC - in response to Message 51271.  
Last modified: 11 Jan 2019, 14:23:51 UTC

I am still getting the 196 (0xc4) EXIT_DISK_LIMIT_EXCEEDED errors even with disc usage space for boincs set at 500 gigs.

It is not your setting. The project needs to change it.
But now they are fixing the problem by going back to the smaller ones; see Stefan's post on the subject.
ID: 51277 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 15
Posts: 1171
Credit: 12,662,148,501
RAC: 4,374
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51284 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 6:50:05 UTC

Just now I tried to download QC tasks and/or QC beta tasks for windows.

However, none are available (according to a notice in the BOINCS Manager).

So all the "unsent" tasks shown on the Server Status Page are still for Linux only?
I thought that there are some available now for Windows.
ID: 51284 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[CSF] Aleksey Belkov

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 13
Posts: 87
Credit: 1,292,358,731
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51285 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 7:05:22 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jan 2019, 7:07:36 UTC

Take 3 for test.
If I understand correctly, calculation progress for these WUs does not display correctly. How much time in average this WUs consuming?

P.S. Such WUs producing quite heavy load on storage subsystem. When 3 of them simultaneously writing data on disk, this generates a stream of almost 1 Gigabyte! o_O (~ 900 MiB/ps).
Without high performance SSD, it is better not to run more than one such WU : )


Upd.

One of them already died -_-
https://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=20269815
ID: 51285 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[CSF] Aleksey Belkov

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 13
Posts: 87
Credit: 1,292,358,731
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51286 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 8:00:49 UTC - in response to Message 51284.  
Last modified: 12 Jan 2019, 8:02:07 UTC

Erich56 wrote:
So all the "unsent" tasks shown on the Server Status Page are still for Linux only?

Only WU Quantum Chemistry, beta test 3.33 (mt) is currently available for Windows. I think on server status page they are Quantum Chemistry, beta test.
You probably need to check your preferences:

Use CPU - yes
Run test applications? - yes
Quantum Chemistry (CPU, beta): yes
ID: 51286 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 15
Posts: 1171
Credit: 12,662,148,501
RAC: 4,374
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51288 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 9:43:00 UTC - in response to Message 51286.  

Use CPU - yes
Run test applications? - yes
Quantum Chemistry (CPU, beta): yes

Thanks for the hint, before I had forgotten to put "Run test applications" on "yes".
I did that now, and one tasks was downloaded and got startet.

What makes me wonder though is that after a few minutes the progress percentage in the BOING Manager got stuck at 1.098%, although the time is progressing, and the Windows task manager shows that Python is running (and using about 214MB RAM).
What I just noticed is that whereas under "remaining time", before some 6 hours where shown; now, about 13 minutes later, the value for "remaining time" has gone up to about 18 hours.
Is this okay, or is the tasks faulty?
ID: 51288 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 15
Posts: 1171
Credit: 12,662,148,501
RAC: 4,374
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51289 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 9:50:38 UTC - in response to Message 51288.  

What makes me wonder though is that after a few minutes the progress percentage in the BOING Manager got stuck at 1.098%, although the time is progressing, and the Windows task manager shows that Python is running (and using about 214MB RAM).
What I just noticed is that whereas under "remaining time", before some 6 hours where shown; now, about 13 minutes later, the value for "remaining time" has gone up to about 18 hours.
Is this okay, or is the tasks faulty?

now, 20 minutes after start, the progress bar is still at 1.098%, the remaining time is shown as 1 day + 6 hours, and Python is using 3.194MB RAM (which is not a problem yet at this point).

ID: 51289 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 15
Posts: 1171
Credit: 12,662,148,501
RAC: 4,374
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51291 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 11:00:08 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jan 2019, 11:01:01 UTC

the task failed with the error
196 (0xc4) EXIT_DISK_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
after 4.461 secs.

http://gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=20291478

Another taks is running, so let's see.
ID: 51291 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[CSF] Aleksey Belkov

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 13
Posts: 87
Credit: 1,292,358,731
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51295 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 15:22:41 UTC - in response to Message 51288.  

Erich56 wrote:
Is this okay, or is the tasks faulty?

As far as I've noticed, all these WU behave this way.

I have finished a bunch of them and their computation time varies from 0,5 to 3 hours. At average 1,5 hours.

Erich56 wrote:
the task failed with the error
196 (0xc4) EXIT_DISK_LIMIT_EXCEEDED

I think it's "ok".
11 of 14 of these WU completed successfully. Failed WUs have the same error.
https://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=164968
ID: 51295 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [AF>Amis des Lapins] Phil1966

Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 13
Posts: 59
Credit: 1,762,854,890
RAC: 2,001
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51299 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 17:57:03 UTC

105 errors / failed on 188 calculated WU's
I understand this is a BETA application.
Hope this helps.
ID: 51299 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 15
Posts: 1171
Credit: 12,662,148,501
RAC: 4,374
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51300 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 19:03:32 UTC

so far, all 3 tasks which got downloaded failed with this exit_disk_limit_exceeded error after about 3900 - 4800 seconds.

I do understand that these tasks are beta, so one cannot expect that they succeed.
Maybe I am lucky though and one of these tasks will be successful eventually.
ID: 51300 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[CSF] Aleksey Belkov

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 13
Posts: 87
Credit: 1,292,358,731
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51304 - Posted: 12 Jan 2019, 23:19:57 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jan 2019, 23:21:12 UTC

As a result, from 30 tasks taken only 14 successfully completed.
There are no more test tasks, so I continue crunching WCG.
ID: 51304 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 15
Posts: 1171
Credit: 12,662,148,501
RAC: 4,374
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51305 - Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 6:34:20 UTC
Last modified: 13 Jan 2019, 6:49:08 UTC

Since I had started with these tasks yesterday, 20 were processed so far, out of which only 2 succeeded.
Hence, I now stopped downloading them, it doesn't make any sense.

What I don't understand is:

13.01.2019 07:46:22 | GPUGRID | Aborting task 194r20-TONI_TST10-0-1-RND3322_3: exceeded disk limit: 41204.15MB > 28610.23MB

so why is there not sufficient disk limit set by the project to begin with ???
ID: 51305 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Bedrich Hajek

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 490
Credit: 11,850,145,728
RAC: 1,299
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51310 - Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 15:10:42 UTC - in response to Message 51305.  

Since I had started with these tasks yesterday, 20 were processed so far, out of which only 2 succeeded.
Hence, I now stopped downloading them, it doesn't make any sense.

What I don't understand is:

13.01.2019 07:46:22 | GPUGRID | Aborting task 194r20-TONI_TST10-0-1-RND3322_3: exceeded disk limit: 41204.15MB > 28610.23MB

so why is there not sufficient disk limit set by the project to begin with ???


This means your file size was 41204.15MB, and the limit is 28610.23MB, not the other way around.

The trick to this, is to find which file contains the limit and change it to a larger number and this task would have finished successfully.






ID: 51310 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 1 Jan 15
Posts: 1171
Credit: 12,662,148,501
RAC: 4,374
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51311 - Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 17:49:12 UTC - in response to Message 51310.  

The trick to this, is to find which file contains the limit and change it to a larger number and this task would have finished successfully.

any advice how to get this accomplished ?
ID: 51311 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Bedrich Hajek

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 09
Posts: 490
Credit: 11,850,145,728
RAC: 1,299
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 51313 - Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 22:26:19 UTC - in response to Message 51311.  

The trick to this, is to find which file contains the limit and change it to a larger number and this task would have finished successfully.

any advice how to get this accomplished ?


Honestly, I have no idea.

I attempted to go to the …/BOINC/slots directory, where there are several directories named 0 ,1, 2, 3 etc. Find the one has the minicoda / wrapper files, and edit with notepad the bonic_task_state.xml file. It should open and look something like this:

<active_task>
<project_master_url>http://www.gpugrid.net/</project_master_url>
<result_name>4534r1-TONI_TST10-0-1-RND0591_4</result_name>
<checkpoint_cpu_time>30.765630</checkpoint_cpu_time>
<checkpoint_elapsed_time>128.215471</checkpoint_elapsed_time>
<fraction_done>0.010989</fraction_done>
<peak_working_set_size>149794816</peak_working_set_size>
<peak_swap_size>139321344</peak_swap_size>
<peak_disk_usage>575110930</peak_disk_usage>
</active_task>

Edit the peak disk usage number to something larger and save the file. In both attempts I failed. WUs errored out. Maybe I should have bumped the numbers higher. I added a zero at the end. The last disk space usage before the crash was over 44 gigs.

Give it try, if you like.

Something similar to this, was done in the past for oversize output files. It worked.







ID: 51313 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 8 · Next

Message boards : Multicore CPUs : QC tests for windows

©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra