Message boards :
News :
More CPU jobs
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This batch will use lots of scratch space. I am set up to run four work units at a time. How much will that need? I can change it as necessary; it is "only" a 120 GB SSD, with maybe 80 GB free at the moment. |
Send message Joined: 5 Mar 13 Posts: 348 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
I think the largest one took 50GB of scratch space. But they should scale linearly (they are not all that big) so it's practically up to chance if you will be able to run them all in parallel depending on if you get some of the smaller ones or the larger ones. |
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
OK, the 250 GB SSDs are a good buy at the moment in the U.S. |
![]() Send message Joined: 26 Feb 14 Posts: 211 Credit: 4,496,324,562 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I submitted some WUs but I am warning you :P This batch will use lots of scratch space. Most errors I get from these work units have this </stderr_txt> ![]() ![]() |
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Two have completed on my Linux box. Tullio |
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
One more task gained 1848.00 credits. Tullio |
![]() Send message Joined: 26 Feb 14 Posts: 211 Credit: 4,496,324,562 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One more task gained 1848.00 credits. 9 1/2 hours? that's longer than most Long Run GPUs tasks ;) |
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Again,1526.20 credits. Tullio |
![]() Send message Joined: 26 Feb 14 Posts: 211 Credit: 4,496,324,562 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Again,1526.20 credits. Starting to see some of the longer run work units Run time - CPU time - Credit 3,812.94 - 11,088.78 - 2,307.16 4,054.73 - 11,758.62 - 2,637.67 ![]() ![]() |
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Longer runs don't seem to be affected by the DISK_LIMIT_EXCEEDED error which happens in some shorter runs.My later long run gave me 1151 credits. Tullio |
Send message Joined: 5 Mar 13 Posts: 348 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
I am submitting now some more of the faster QMML50_3 workunits. These should be quite quick and have a higher priority than the SELE6 so you might be getting these for a while now. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Run time 3,241.13 CPU time 4,048.97 Validate state Valid Credit 157.51 |
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 869 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Run time 3,241.13 Hm, a marked drop in the credit, compared to what Zalster got (see a few postings above):
|
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Yes, but his CPU time is much higher, probably because of the core number he has. I have only two. Tullio |
![]() Send message Joined: 26 Feb 14 Posts: 211 Credit: 4,496,324,562 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, but his CPU time is much higher, probably because of the core number he has. I have only two. Couple of things I've noticed. The computer that are getting the higher time/credit only has 12 threads. My 10core/20thread is still getting the shorter, quicker work units. Not sure why. Also, most of the long run are resends that erred out on other computers. Maybe it was the disk space as the issue, don't know. Just thought I would point that out as well. |
Send message Joined: 8 May 18 Posts: 190 Credit: 104,426,808 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
My Linux HP laptop cannot get GPUGRID tasks because it has only 24.90 GB available and the server says it needs 32. So I am running SETI@home on it, which does not require that much space. |
Send message Joined: 5 Mar 13 Posts: 348 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
I have no clue how the BOINC scheduler works but if it works as I hope it works you should be getting only the QMML50 workunits for a while now. Maybe some SELE6 were still scheduled from before. |
![]() Send message Joined: 26 Feb 14 Posts: 211 Credit: 4,496,324,562 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes the new QMML50s are flowing. Running between 2-4 minutes currently. Will keep an eye on them. ![]() ![]() |
Send message Joined: 10 Jul 19 Posts: 1 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Help! I have no working coming in and it has been a number of days, I see there is plenty of work on the server??? Please advise soonest, thanks Gary |
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There is GPU work available. And you will need an Nvidia GPU. There has not been CPU work for a long time. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra