Message boards :
Number crunching :
Short runs
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 3 Credit: 266,189,206 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Why there is no work units in the "short runs" category ? If I refer to the definition "2-3 hours on fastest card", some are eligible. |
|
Send message Joined: 23 Dec 09 Posts: 189 Credit: 4,798,881,008 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just to put it in the same thread: "Just like to ask project-team: Why these "ADRIA_FOLDA3D50_crystal_ss_contacts_20" do not run as short tasks? They take less than 2 hours on a GTX1070. This seems perfect to me to fit under the definition of short runs. Is it just negligence of ADRIA or is there a deeper reason? I am asking as I think it would be helpful to stick to the definitions, so that participants with lesser cards get there fair share of the work units. Especially, when there are so few short WUs available." |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
+ 1 |
|
Send message Joined: 19 Aug 07 Posts: 46 Credit: 45,339,082 RAC: 28 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just to put it in the same thread: I am not sure but a reason you maybe seeing faster runtimes is because your 1070 is on your Linux machine. I would certainly be looking to see some shorter running tasks |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra