Message boards :
Number crunching :
Not getting new work
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 09 Posts: 91 Credit: 1,603,303,394 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I haven't received new work for nearly a day. GPU's are asking but the reply is consistently 'Project has no tasks available'. Any one else experiencing this? Is this a normal phenomenon periodically? Edit: I stand corrected, I did receive one WU about 10 hours ago but that's almost finished so when it is done, all my GPU's will be idle and waiting. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
... Is this a normal phenomenon periodically?yes, it is |
MisfitSend message Joined: 23 May 08 Posts: 33 Credit: 610,551,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If this is your only GPU project you can attach to a second GPU project and set its resource share to zero. That way it'll only run when this project is out of work. me@rescam.org |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 14 Posts: 17 Credit: 378,346,925 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How long did that dry period lasts in the past ? I have one math-oriented backup project running but it feels like waste to energy to my. Based on experience: how many days they need to refill the queue ? Or is their research focus changed finally ? |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 09 Posts: 91 Credit: 1,603,303,394 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
yes, it is Ah, thanks for the reply. At least now I know it wasn't in my setup. If this is your only GPU project you can attach to a second GPU project and set its resource share to zero. That way it'll only run when this project is out of work. Yes at this time. I don't mind a pause here and there just so I know what the norm is. Good suggestion, I may look into some other GPU projects. Crunching since Feb 2003 (United Devices, Find-a-Drug) |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Over the past they mostly ran dry over the weekend and filled the queue at the beginning of the week. That has not yet happened this time, though. Personally I run Einstein@Home at 1/100 the ressource share of GPU-Grid, which works fine. This way BOINC builds up a larger Einstein buffer if GPU-Grid is down than at ressource share 0. Make sure to max your GPU memory clock and run 2 WUs concurrently (can be set in the profile). MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 513 Credit: 4,673,458,277 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The 2 WUs per GPU might be a cause for these shortages as each new WU is only created once the previous one is uploaded and validated. I suggest having only one WU per GPU |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The 2 WUs per GPU might be a cause for these shortages as each new WU is only created once the previous one is uploaded and validated. I suggest having only one WU per GPU Well, if there are no WUs available at all (like during the past few days), it makes not difference as to whether there are 2 WUs or 1 WU per GPU. The well has run dry :-( |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Over the past they mostly ran dry over the weekend and filled the queue at the beginning of the week. That has not yet happened this time, though. I suspect that this time it has to do with the vacation period that has started recently. But, as said before, it would just be nice if we received any kind of indication as to when we can expect new WUs. |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Jul 16 Posts: 338 Credit: 7,987,341,558 RAC: 193 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has this been the 1st shortage since admins mentioned stopping DC support? Might just be the end for good. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has this been the 1st shortage since admins mentioned stopping DC support? hm, where/when did they mention this? |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 318 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has this been the 1st shortage since admins mentioned stopping DC support? Here, nearly a month ago. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has this been the 1st shortage since admins mentioned stopping DC support? ah, this is what you mean; I remember this posting by Stefan. However, I don't think that many of the current problems are caused by BOINC. It's basically the new buggy crunching software, which had to be put together in a hurry in April after the former one stopped working from one moment to the other. Then, there are a few other things that would help us crunchers - and again, they have nothing to do with BOINC. |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 08 Posts: 87 Credit: 1,248,879,715 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has anyone received work for the past week or three? I see units show up on the server status page but I don't get any. My machines have run GPUGrid for several years and they haven't changed. I did have them on another project for 6 months but haven't had any work since I came back. |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Jul 16 Posts: 338 Credit: 7,987,341,558 RAC: 193 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has this been the 1st shortage since admins mentioned stopping DC support? Correct thread I was thinking of. Post was a bit farther up: https://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=4584&nowrap=true#47404 Fixing bugs with BOINC is relatively pointless from our perspective (and time-intensive). We are considering rather other options like moving out of it, but don't ask when or how as it's more an idea than a scheduled plan. I agree though. Other GPU apps run better in many ways. The issues are with the project, but not because GPUGrid is using BOINC as its distribution channel. OTH, I got 2 tasks just about 2 hours ago. |
|
Send message Joined: 23 Dec 09 Posts: 189 Credit: 4,798,881,008 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
fractal, There has been a problem with the driver around the time you are not receiving new WUs. Your diver is still 367.55 on one of the cards and 355.11 on the other with Cuda65. Please try to up-date your driver. I am using 375.66 (Cuda80) on a GTX1070 in Lubuntu, and do not have any problems with downloading and processing WUs. klepel |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
fractal, from what I remember back in April when the new crunching software was introduced, at least driver version 381.65 is needed. Meanwhile, there are even newer versions available from NVIDIA. |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 08 Posts: 87 Credit: 1,248,879,715 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
fractal, I updated to the latest public version from nvidia, 375.66, and am getting a different message. There is no work so I'll check again tomorrow. Thanks for the suggestion. FWIW, http://www.gpugrid.net/join.php says 343 is good enough. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I updated to the latest public version from nvidia, 375.66, hm, this driver version is definitely an older one. Which OS are you using? |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Aug 08 Posts: 87 Credit: 1,248,879,715 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Much improved. Both of my systems are crunching cuda80 units. I am running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS on both machines. I went to the nvidia download page and got the latest released issue for the 970 on linux 64. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra