Message boards :
Number crunching :
SWAN_SYNC Enable/Disable
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jan 13 Posts: 216 Credit: 846,538,252 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've tried searching the forums for how to enable/disable swan sync. Please feel free to delete this thread, but I can't find instructions. I have one W7 host on which I'd like to disable SWAN. I know this is has been a common question over the years, but my attempt to search for it has yielded nothing. Maybe we can create a sticky? Thank you. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
To switch Swan-Sync on: In "System" - go to [Environmental Variables] Look for the lower section called "System Variables", click on the [New] button below the list of System Variables. Type swan_sync in the name field Type 1 in the Value field Click [OK] 3 times. Exit BOINC manager with stopping all applications Start BOINC manager. For switching it off, change the value field from 1 to 0. |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
To switch Swan-Sync on: Sorry Erich56 to switch off you must delete/remove the swan_sync variable altogether and reboot computer. Changing the value will have no effect. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sorry Erich56 to switch off you must delete/remove the swan_sync variable altogether and reboot computer. Changing the value will have no effect. hm, I was almost sure that, long time ago, I did is this way - just to try out and to see the difference. Maybe I remember wrongly and am mistaken now. Of course, to delete the entry would be the safest way :-) |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 513 Credit: 4,673,458,277 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This should be pinned, I've been trying to figure this out for years |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jan 13 Posts: 216 Credit: 846,538,252 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks! |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Advanced search SWAN_SYNC FAQ - Best configurations for GPUGRID Keyboard skills tip for the day:
FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
ChileanSend message Joined: 8 Oct 12 Posts: 98 Credit: 385,652,461 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
To enable swan_sync, should I use 1 or 0?1 |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
To enable swan_sync, should I use 1 or 0? Try both and you'll find it makes no difference. |
ChileanSend message Joined: 8 Oct 12 Posts: 98 Credit: 385,652,461 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1166 Credit: 12,260,898,501 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
hm, that's strange. I don't think is has to do with the type of GPU. For example, two of my GPUs I use for GPUGRID are "old" GTX750Ti - and even there I could notice the big difference . With Swansync off, CPU usage was very low, with Swansync on, a CPU core is being used close to it's full capacity. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 351 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
hm, that's strange. But does it do any more work - complete the tasks more quickly? Otherwise, you're just wasting a core that could be doing something else. |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Mar 18 Posts: 53 Credit: 2,815,476,011 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Changing swan_sync to 1 has definitely made a change for me on GPUGRID. Not a lot of data points, but so far seeing 2 to 5% improvement in completion times. Since I am in grcpool-2, here is a link to my tasks: http://www.gpugrid.net//results.php?hostid=473538 However, it also had an unintended consequence in my backup project, Milkyway@home. I had that set up to run two GPU tasks at once using the app_config file. However, the swan_sync setting seemed to have dedicated one core for each task, not just one total for my one 1070 GPU. So, overall, when Milkyway is running, I lose one core previously being used on my CPU projects. Can anyone confirm this is indeed what should/does happen? If so, is there any work-around? (I haven't convinced myself to try to run two GPUGRID tasks at once yet due to cooling problems on my bought Dell 8930 -- don't gag; I am saving up for my first build!) i5-8400 6 core using Intel Turbo Boost to 3.8GHz GTX 1070 from Dell (sort of a Founder's Edition?), OC only 15MHz on both GPU and Memory clocks using Afterburner Windows 10 |
titoSend message Joined: 21 May 09 Posts: 22 Credit: 2,002,780,169 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Obviously more powerful CPU and weaker GPU: SWAN_SYNC gives less. But in my case... Few days ago I tried trick and my run times decresed from ~ 20k to ~17,5k seconds (yes I'm aware of different WUs - that's average). GPU is OC 1080Ti, but CPU is old XEON 1230V2 - 2 WU at once. https://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=197892 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra