Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
Inside Volta
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/inside-volta |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 513 Credit: 4,673,458,277 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We're not getting that until 2018 for consumers |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 6 Credit: 76,105,375 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
How would you guys develop Cuda 9 support for Volta if the consumer variants don't come out till next year possibly (or late this year....) Would the Uni purchase a system or would your project have to provide the cash to purchase? or like Pascal, wait until the consumer variants are out and program accordingly? 'Cause I was thinking one of these would work wonders (wish I had that kinda cash to splurge myself - maybe a gofundme to get started. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/dgx-station/#source=pr Kinda makes my Titan X Pascal a bit redundant now. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Even the HBM2 memory will be in short supply until some time well into 2018. It is estimated that AMD will be able to deliver less than 16,000 VEGA cards this year due to that. Maybe a few high-end Voltas will appear this year, but not in a price range for most GPUGrid crunchers. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/titan/titan-v/ Volta Titan (GV100) now up for sale... 6GPC * (80 SMV) @64 FP32 cores 5120 CUDA 12288 MB HBM2 21.1 billion 12nm transistors Could be 2x faster than a GTX1080ti at FP32 for here. Possible >6Tera FP64 which is equal to GTX980ti (GM200) FP32 or 4 OG titans FP64. Nvidia is asking 3 times cost of the OG titan. An OG Titan ACEMD 8.0CUDA runtime on par with GTX 1060 / GTX 980. Will the Volta Geforce GTX series release within 8 months... |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I still think that there's no point in buying TITAN series cards for crunching GPUGrid, as this series is overpriced so much that you can buy two gaming (GTX series) cards instead, and have 1.9 times crunching power for the same money. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A Linux GTX 1070 system is nearly as fast as WDDM GTX 1080ti system due scaling issues so a Titan V will certainly want Linux for ACEMD to perform fully. Considering Tesla GV100 cost is 10k usd some might look at 3k Volta as a compute bargain. Volta feature set only adds to already impressive Pascal.(Volta FP32 and INT cores are now separate from each other.) CPU these days are stale rehashes of Haswell. Very few programs take advantage of power hungry AVX512 on Skylake. Whatever Nvidia decide to do with next gen gaming series they will leave Pascal (Maxwell) in the dust at any program. As Maxwell did to Kelper. Every generation NVidia lowered their per core or since Maxwell (32 core block warp) energy usage allowing more cores to be added. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Could be 2x faster than a GTX1080ti at FP32 for here. What makes you say that? It's 13.8 TFlops for a stock Titan V against 11.3 TFlops for a stock 1080Ti. The Titan should have a higher OC headroom due to its lower base clock, but is limited to +20% power. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Jul 16 Posts: 338 Credit: 7,987,341,558 RAC: 259 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I still think that there's no point in buying TITAN series cards for crunching GPUGrid, as this series is overpriced so much that you can buy two gaming (GTX series) cards instead, and have 1.9 times crunching power for the same money. I agree, especially for FP32 projects. Some of the older Titans used to have better FP64 ratios but now they are priced so high its not worth it. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We have already received a Volta GPU from Nvidia. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 513 Credit: 4,673,458,277 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We have already received a Volta GPU from Nvidia. Nice! I'm glad Nvidia care so much about science. Is it the V100 or a gaming variant with more FP32 meant for future release? |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If it was the latter he wouldn't be allowed to tell us. Besides, the current rumors say there is not going to be any "gamer Volta". They're going to be called Ampere and released in Q2 2018. Very probably it's just a name change, though. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
it's a Tesla V100 |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
it's a Tesla V100 FYI: A new Volta v9.1.85 CUDA toolkit is available. Previous CUDA Toolkit v9.0.176 released September 2017. 388.59 (windows) driver has v9.1.104 CUDA. |
|
Send message Joined: 13 Feb 11 Posts: 25 Credit: 7,516,466,698 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Does the new CUDA toolkit help in any way for GPUGRID crunching? |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Does the new CUDA toolkit help in any way for GPUGRID crunching? This is a good question for admins.. There a chance (or not) CUDA9.1 is faster. GPUGRID project has seen previous (ACEMD app) performance increase with CUDA upgrades. 388.59 (windows) driver has v9.1.104 CUDA. 388.71 officially supports v9.1 CUDA in release notes. The .59 driver does not - a reason why Volta Titan CUDA review benchmarks were inconsistent or not working. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra