Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
GTX 1080 Ti goes official
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/products/10series/geforce-gtx-1080-ti/ http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti GPU Engine Specs: 3584 NVIDIA CUDA® Cores 1582 MHz Boost Clock Memory Specs: 11 Gbps Memory Speed 11 GB GDDR5X Standard Memory Config 352-bit Memory Interface Width 484 GB/sec Memory Bandwidth Technology Support: Simultaneous Multi-Projection VR Ready NVIDIA Ansel NVidia SLI® HB Bridge Supported NVIDIA G-SYNC™-Ready NVIDIA GameStream™-Ready NVIDIA GPU Boost™ 3.0 Microsoft DirectX 12 API with feature level 12_1 Vulkan API OpenGL 4.5 PCIe 3.0 Bus Support OS Certification Windows 7..10, Linux, FreeBSDx86 Display Support: Maximum Digital Resolution 7680x4320@60Hz Standard Display Connectors DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b Multi Monitor HDCP 2.2 Graphics Card Dimensions: Height 4.376" Length 10.5" Width 2-Slot Thermal and Power Specs: Maximum GPU Temperature 91°C Graphics Card Power 250 W Recommended System Power 600 W Supplementary Power Connectors One 6-pin, One 8-pin |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Mar 16 Posts: 513 Credit: 4,673,458,277 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I never thought I'd say or type 352-bit bus before lol. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I never thought I'd say or type 352-bit bus before lol. How about the 11 GB RAM? |
|
Send message Joined: 20 Apr 15 Posts: 285 Credit: 1,102,216,607 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Didn't we speak of GPUGRID enforcing a 1 Job per GPU policy soon? So many people were asking for that ... and I can already see the 1080ti load bouncing like a rubber ball. I am not aware of any CPU which can feed this monster entirely, not even a 7700K ...maybe unless overclocked to the sky and LN2 cooled. Well... but the 1080ti certainly is Dynamite for F@H. I would love to see HCF1 protein folding and interaction simulations to help my little boy... someday. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Mar 12 Posts: 103 Credit: 14,948,929,771 RAC: 17 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is already one 1080Ti crunching GPUGRId http://www.gpugrid.net/hosts_user.php?userid=81692 |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is already one 1080Ti crunching GPUGRId Those are 1080's |
|
Send message Joined: 10 Oct 11 Posts: 13 Credit: 192,770,371 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is already one 1080Ti crunching GPUGRId That would be me. Everything is going good so far. Modest overclock of 1999 MHz and 1377 MHz vram. Just put my 1080 back in. I'll see if running @ x8 will affect performance. |
|
Send message Joined: 10 Oct 11 Posts: 13 Credit: 192,770,371 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is already one 1080Ti crunching GPUGRId One is a 1080 Ti. http://imgur.com/a/Oqsck |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 16 Posts: 9 Credit: 19,338,667 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Didn't we speak of GPUGRID enforcing a 1 Job per GPU policy soon? So many people were asking for that ... Wait.. What? Why? |
|
Send message Joined: 20 Apr 15 Posts: 285 Credit: 1,102,216,607 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Didn't we speak of GPUGRID enforcing a 1 Job per GPU policy soon? So many people were asking for that ... see this discussion: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=4501 I do not second that for reasons of high-end GPU utilization and load fluctuation, but apparently quite a few crunchers have a different opinion. I would love to see HCF1 protein folding and interaction simulations to help my little boy... someday. |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 16 Posts: 9 Credit: 19,338,667 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Didn't we speak of GPUGRID enforcing a 1 Job per GPU policy soon? So many people were asking for that ... My 970 gtx OC is not being used fully with 1 long WU. So I use 2 long WU's which most of the time take 92-97% GPU usage together. and almost all of the WU's are being finished in 10-13 hours. with SWAN being used as well. There were only a couple of single long WU's that would utilize about 75% of my card. So unless they can somehow make the GPU be utilized to fullest with 1 WU there's no reason to cap 1WU/GPU. They should just make a filter for host. let the server be smart choosing for whom to send 1 or 2 jobs. |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Nov 16 Posts: 9 Credit: 19,338,667 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Interestingly enough. just got a WU that uses 95% of my gpu... Kudos for that! |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra