Message boards :
Server and website :
Problem with upload server?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That sounds like the expected behaviour if the communications channel - end-to-end, anywhere along the line - has an intermediate device which is dropping packets. If a packet is dropped in the middle of the transfer, there's a 'hole' in the received data where the missing packet should be, and I think BOINC's progress meter only shows data acknowledged without holes. When the server requests a resend of the missing packet, and finally acknowledges it, the hole is filled in and the 'progress so far' jumps to include the later packets which have already been received out of order. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've just watched task 16759934 uploading from the north of England. 107 MB, showing ~445 KB/sec steady speed, completed in 246 seconds (at that speed, it should have been 240 seconds, so a little loss). I have a FTTC optical connection, with ~10 Mbit/sec uplink. (Router is currently showing 9.999 Mbps). So I was getting ~90% theoretical maximum. Nothing obviously wrong there. I think that, like last time, the problem isn't the GPUGrid server, but some link, switch, or router in the international connector between your ISP and Spain. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
since yesterday, the upload speed is back to what it normally is: on my WinXP machines, the upload speed to GPUGRID normally is between 280 and 380 KBps. so let's see for how long this will last. |
|
Send message Joined: 10 Jun 13 Posts: 9 Credit: 295,692,471 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi all, I rejoined this project after a long brake as my old GPUs were not powerful enough to support it. The new one is fast enough and it finished a few WUs in the past days. Like Erich56 I noticed intermittent download/upload problems but today it all seems to work at full speed. Based on Richard Haselgrove's comments I suggest to post some traceroute paths. If there is a common network node in the traces of affected users that is missing in the traces of other users this may be a hint to identify the bottleneck. My traces (LAN and local ISP hops removed): traceroute -I www.gpugrid.org traceroute to www.gpugrid.org (84.89.134.145), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 4 87.186.200.142 (87.186.200.142) 25.197 ms 25.216 ms 25.416 ms 5 f-ed8-i.F.DE.NET.DTAG.DE (217.5.95.114) 27.937 ms 28.805 ms 28.823 ms 6 te0-0-0-5-4.agr41.fra03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.14.149) 28.825 ms 24.536 ms 24.509 ms 7 be3186.ccr41.fra03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.0.1) 24.495 ms 24.475 ms 24.454 ms 8 be2799.ccr41.par01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.58.234) 37.299 ms 37.221 ms 37.146 ms 9 be3325.ccr21.bio02.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.48.205) 49.148 ms 49.379 ms 49.283 ms 10 be3357.ccr31.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.1.21) 54.259 ms 54.088 ms 54.006 ms 11 be3375.agr22.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.50.202) 55.501 ms 55.724 ms 55.645 ms 12 be2853.rcr11.b015537-1.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.56.62) 51.609 ms 53.262 ms 53.184 ms 13 149.11.68.2 (149.11.68.2) 56.547 ms 55.245 ms 55.159 ms 14 CIEMAT.AE2.telmad.rt4.mad.red.rediris.es (130.206.245.2) 52.929 ms 52.273 ms 52.207 ms 15 TELMAD.AE4.uv.rt1.val.red.rediris.es (130.206.245.89) 58.730 ms 58.265 ms 58.181 ms 16 anella-val1-router.red.rediris.es (130.206.211.70) 66.893 ms 68.186 ms * 17 * * * 18 84.89.159.147 (84.89.159.147) 63.540 ms 63.841 ms 63.673 ms 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 grosso.upf.edu (84.89.134.145) 67.743 ms 68.738 ms 68.571 ms Cheers |
|
Send message Joined: 30 Apr 13 Posts: 109 Credit: 3,977,737,860 RAC: 575,436 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
104MB Upload this morning looked fine until about 70%, then: 12/14/2017 7:33:32 AM | GPUGRID | [error] Error reported by file upload server: [e46s4_e1s74p1f193-PABLO_p27_wild_0_sj403_IDP-1-2-RND2605_0_9] locked by file_upload_handler PID=112630 12/14/2017 7:33:32 AM | GPUGRID | Temporarily failed upload of e46s4_e1s74p1f193-PABLO_p27_wild_0_sj403_IDP-1-2-RND2605_0_9: transient upload error 12/14/2017 7:33:32 AM | GPUGRID | Backing off 00:00:46 on upload of e46s4_e1s74p1f193-PABLO_p27_wild_0_sj403_IDP-1-2-RND2605_0_9 Then it went into a backoff/retry loop for several minutes, then picked up again at the "normal" 130-140KBps and completed. Win |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Based on Richard Haselgrove's comments I suggest to post some traceroute paths. Mine looks like this (using Windows): tracert www.gpugrid.org Tracing route to www.gpugrid.org [84.89.134.145] over a maximum of 30 hops: 5 13 ms 13 ms 12 ms core1-hu0-17-0-5.colindale.ukcore.bt.net [195.99.127.150] 6 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms peer6-hu0-6-0-2.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.172.103.13] 7 13 ms 13 ms 12 ms gi3-0.lonth-inter-1.interoute.net [195.66.224.53] 8 28 ms 28 ms 26 ms ae1-0.par-gar-score-1-re0.interoute.net [212.23.42.21] 9 34 ms 35 ms 34 ms ae1-0.mad-001-score-1-re0.interoute.net [89.202.161.21] 10 35 ms 35 ms 34 ms 206.pool1.dialup.cybernet-ag.de [195.143.124.206] 11 42 ms 42 ms 41 ms TELMAD.AE4.uv.rt1.val.red.rediris.es [130.206.245.89] 12 * 56 ms 56 ms anella-val1-router.red.rediris.es [130.206.211.70] 13 * * * Request timed out. 14 * 55 ms 55 ms 84.89.159.147 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * * * Request timed out. 17 48 ms 49 ms 47 ms grosso.upf.edu [84.89.134.145] Why on earth do I go via a dialup pool in Germany? |
|
Send message Joined: 30 Apr 13 Posts: 109 Credit: 3,977,737,860 RAC: 575,436 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Here's my tracert from Nebraska, USA. Looks like I wander in atlas.congentco] system for quite a distance, but have the same timeouts near grosso.upf.edu, including that device with no DNS entry. http://www.cogentco.com/files/images/network/network_map/2017web_networkmap_page.jpg 5 31 ms 31 ms 32 ms dalsbprj01-ae1.0.rd.dl.cox.net [68.1.2.109] 6 23 ms 23 ms 24 ms lag-105.ear4.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.16.234.37] 7 * * * Request timed out. 8 32 ms 30 ms 31 ms Cogent-level3-200G.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.72.34] 9 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms be2764.ccr32.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.47.213] 10 34 ms 34 ms 33 ms be2433.ccr22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.3.214] 11 46 ms 45 ms 45 ms be2832.ccr42.ord01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.44.170] 12 70 ms 71 ms 71 ms be2718.ccr22.cle04.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.7.130] 13 62 ms 63 ms 63 ms be2879.ccr22.alb02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.29.174] 14 65 ms 64 ms 64 ms be2302.ccr32.bos01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.43.13] 15 129 ms 129 ms 128 ms be2983.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.1.177] 16 134 ms 133 ms 134 ms be12489.ccr42.par01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.57.70] 17 147 ms 146 ms 146 ms be3324.ccr22.bio02.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.2.65] 18 154 ms 153 ms 152 ms be3358.ccr32.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.97] 19 160 ms 161 ms 161 ms be3378.agr21.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.36.174] 20 151 ms 151 ms 151 ms be2852.rcr11.b015537-1.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.36.166] 21 155 ms 155 ms 164 ms 149.11.68.2 22 168 ms 166 ms 167 ms CIEMAT.AE1.cica.rt1.and.red.rediris.es [130.206.245.38] 23 188 ms 194 ms 217 ms CICA.AE1.uv.rt1.val.red.rediris.es [130.206.245.34] 24 175 ms 174 ms 176 ms anella-val1-router.red.rediris.es [130.206.211.70] 25 * * * Request timed out. 26 175 ms 175 ms 174 ms 84.89.159.147 27 * * * Request timed out. 28 * * * Request timed out. 29 193 ms 194 ms 192 ms grosso.upf.edu [84.89.134.145] Win |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Jul 16 Posts: 339 Credit: 8,281,341,558 RAC: 792,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
From Northern Virginia VZ FiOS. 4 10 ms 6 ms 7 ms B3361.WASHDC-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [100.41.128.16] 5 * * * Request timed out. 6 10 ms 8 ms 9 ms 0.et-5-1-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET [140.222.239.85] 7 13 ms 12 ms 12 ms be3018.ccr41.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.10.197] 8 12 ms 11 ms 9 ms be3084.ccr42.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.30.65] 9 16 ms 17 ms 15 ms be2807.ccr42.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.40.109] 10 82 ms 81 ms 82 ms be2490.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.42.86] 11 92 ms 92 ms 93 ms be12489.ccr42.par01.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.57.70] 12 104 ms 104 ms 105 ms be3324.ccr52.bio02.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.2.65] 13 104 ms 106 ms 106 ms be3358.ccr32.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com [130.117.1.97] 14 106 ms 106 ms 106 ms be3378.agr21.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.36.174] 15 105 ms 107 ms 106 ms be2852.rcr11.b015537-1.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com [154.54.36.166] 16 112 ms 113 ms 112 ms 149.11.68.2 17 113 ms 113 ms 115 ms CIEMAT.AE2.telmad.rt4.mad.red.rediris.es [130.206.245.2] 18 123 ms 124 ms 122 ms TELMAD.AE4.uv.rt1.val.red.rediris.es [130.206.245.89] 19 123 ms 118 ms 118 ms anella-val1-router.red.rediris.es [130.206.211.70] 20 * * * Request timed out. 21 127 ms 126 ms 124 ms 84.89.159.147 22 * * * Request timed out. 23 * * * Request timed out. 24 138 ms 142 ms 140 ms grosso.upf.edu [84.89.134.145] And using a VPN with a Swiss location. 1 118 ms 118 ms 118 ms 10.69.10.1 2 118 ms 119 ms 120 ms 5.157.7.81 3 120 ms 121 ms 119 ms 5.157.4.25 4 119 ms 120 ms 119 ms 83.231.187.177 5 140 ms 139 ms 138 ms ae-16.r24.frnkge08.de.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.7.16] 6 152 ms 151 ms 150 ms ae-5.r24.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.12] 7 238 ms 171 ms 175 ms ae-6.r01.mdrdsp03.es.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.138] 8 182 ms 174 ms 174 ms rediris.baja.espanix.net [193.149.1.26] 9 185 ms 186 ms 185 ms CIEMAT.AE1.cica.rt1.and.red.rediris.es [130.206.245.38] 10 200 ms 200 ms 203 ms CICA.AE1.uv.rt1.val.red.rediris.es [130.206.245.34] 11 206 ms 206 ms 207 ms anella-val1-router.red.rediris.es [130.206.211.70] 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 204 ms 203 ms 202 ms 84.89.159.147 14 * * * Request timed out. 15 * * * Request timed out. 16 * 205 ms 206 ms grosso.upf.edu [84.89.134.145] |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
half an hour ago, a finished task got uploaded with "normal" speed; a few minutes later, the next one goes with about a tenth of the "normal" speed. I made ping and tracert, results as follows: Pinging gpugrid.net [84.89.134.145] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 84.89.134.145: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=44 Reply from 84.89.134.145: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=44 Reply from 84.89.134.145: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=44 Reply from 84.89.134.145: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=44 Ping statistics for 84.89.134.145: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 76ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 76ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert gpugrid.net Tracing route to gpugrid.net [84.89.134.145] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 7 ms 7 ms 7 ms 84.116.26.237 4 30 ms 30 ms 32 ms at-vie15a-rd1-ae24-2098.aorta.net [84.116.229.12 9] 5 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms at-vie05d-rc1-ae39-0.aorta.net [84.116.145.142] 6 * * * Request timed out. 7 29 ms 30 ms 28 ms uk-lon01b-ri1-ae23-0.aorta.net [84.116.135.30] 8 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms 195.66.225.24 9 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms ndn-gw.mx1.lon.uk.geant.net [109.105.102.98] 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 * * * Request timed out. 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 51 ms 50 ms 50 ms ae1.mx1.mar.fr.geant.net [62.40.98.72] 14 64 ms 64 ms 63 ms rediris-ias-rediris-gw.mar.fr.geant.net [83.97.8 8.130] 15 70 ms 70 ms 70 ms TELMAD.AE4.uv.rt1.val.red.rediris.es [130.206.24 5.89] 16 78 ms 76 ms 76 ms anella-val1-router.red.rediris.es [130.206.211.7 0] 17 * * * Request timed out. 18 76 ms 76 ms 77 ms 84.89.159.147 19 * * * Request timed out. 20 * * * Request timed out. 21 77 ms 76 ms 88 ms grosso.upf.edu [84.89.134.145] Trace complete. As can be seen, quite a lot of timeouts :-( Merry Christmas to everybody! |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
"Request Timed Out" is not necessarily a problem or fault as there is a lot of hardware on the internet which doesn't respond to pings. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Again, big upload problems all day long. Now the uploads even come to a halt and change to "retry" status. At the same time, as already done before, I opened SpeedtestNet and chose servers in Barcelona. No problems at all. So, my guess is that the failure is with GPUGRID. |
|
Send message Joined: 2 Jul 16 Posts: 339 Credit: 8,281,341,558 RAC: 792,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The couple times I have caught an upload recently it had been much improved. Sometimes over 1gig. It still had the jump up in upload speed, a gradual fall off and jump back up but from 150m to 1g is a nice jump. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
again, upload is extremely slow (this has also been the case several time within the past days) - about 20 KB/s (normally, it's between 250 and 350 KB/s). |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
today, once more major problems with the upload server. Uploads take forever. I am wondering how come that no one at GPUGRID is able to get this repaired. A really annoying situation :-( |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am unable to reach the GPUGrid website (forums, etc.) several times a day. It is annoying when you are trying to change settings, or post a comment. But since the uploads retry often enough, it is not really a problem for that. I am surprised there are not more comments about it however. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But since the uploads retry often enough, it is not really a problem for that.except that when the crunching time before was - say - 23 hours (which is often the case with my two GTX750ti's), and the upload takes, as happened today, 1 1/2 hours. Thus you loose 20% of the credit points. I am surprised there are not more comments about it however.so am I |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
except that when the crunching time before was - say - 23 hours (which is often the case with my two GTX750ti's), and the upload takes, as happened today, 1 1/2 hours. Thus you loose 20% of the credit points. You have reminded me that I have a GTX 750 Ti sitting on the shelf, and I just converted a machine to Ubuntu 16.04, where I think it would get in under the 24 hour limit with the new Linux app. It is still about the most efficient card out there, and should get me through the summer, since I have had to shut down my GTX 970 and 980. It should work. You should try Ubuntu. It is awful to learn, but once you get it then it is actually faster to install than Windows now. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You have reminded me that I have a GTX 750 Ti sitting on the shelf, and I just converted a machine to Ubuntu 16.04, where I think it would get in under the 24 hour limit with the new Linux app. My first Pablo_IDP came it at 10 hours, and Adria_FOLDT0986 came in at 10 1/2 hours, so it works. http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=433866 For a card with a TDP of 60 watts, that will do. EDIT: The Adria was about what I would expect, based on my GTX 970 and 980, but the Pablo was unusually fast. I would expect about 20 to 22 hours. We will see. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Jan 15 Posts: 1171 Credit: 12,662,148,501 RAC: 1,014,572 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
[quote]My first Pablo_IDP came it at 10 hours, and Adria_FOLDT0986 came in at 10 1/2 hours, so it works. :-) :-) :-) |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I knew you would like it. It is the standard non-overclocked ASUS card. I don't do anything to boost it, but according to Nvidia X Server, the Graphics Clock is running at 1346 MHz. |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra