Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
new driver: 178.24 WHQL
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They're out. Did anyone test them yet? It's somewhat unfortunate timing, as a driver switch will now coincide with the new 6.48 client, so observing performance changes will be difficult. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,174,624,885 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've installed them on 2 Cards so far, they work is about all I can really say ... |
ayQueSend message Joined: 6 Sep 08 Posts: 18 Credit: 806,771 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've installed them on 2 Cards so far, they work is about all I can really say ... dito :-) |
K1atOdessaSend message Joined: 25 Feb 08 Posts: 249 Credit: 444,646,963 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've installed them on 2 Cards so far, they work is about all I can really say ... Same for me. Running two 8800GT's. I've only been running for about 1.5 days with the new drivers, but the few 6.45 WU's I've processed have times that seem comparable to the 178.13 drivers. That being said, I was unaware that the 6.48 app was coming out only a day later, so I'll let someone else test them separately who hasn't already installed 178.24. |
ayQueSend message Joined: 6 Sep 08 Posts: 18 Credit: 806,771 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Switched back to the prev. driver. With .24 I had more ms/step :/ http://www.ps3grid.net/result.php?resultid=85630 32 ms instead of 27 ms / step |
GreeriSend message Joined: 16 Mar 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 240,901,677 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
On windows xp with a GTX260 cuda 178. 25.792 ms, 25.797 ms, 26.100 ms, 25.613 ms, 26.006 ms, 26.042 ms, 25.745 ms cuda 177. 25.839 ms I will let it run the rest of the night to verify the single result. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Which versions are you comparing? 178.24 and 177.? Anyway, the message seems to be that there is no difference with your setup, which is good to know. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 08 Posts: 55 Credit: 1,475,857 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]()
|
New drivers works fine, I'm getting 27 to 29 MS on my first units, will take time to average it out. I've bench marked, gamed, and downgraded/upgraded long enough to agree with this article: Do New Drivers Really Boost Performance? http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/GeForce-Catalyst-overclocking,2037.html My personal experience is it has more to do with stability than performance! And as for the thorough numbers and test setups done in this article, the conclusion is that drivers improved performance, but not for all graphics chips. Your own interpretation will vary depending on your own setup. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Do New Drivers Really Boost Performance? Of course they do.. sometimes for certain hardware/software combinations. And sometimes it's a half step backwards. My personal experience is it has more to do with stability than performance! Yes, fixing things is the reason why we get so frequent driver updates. Regarding performance.. there's just so much you can do once you invented the wheel. You can tweak it a bit, but you can't make it more round ;) With GPU-Grid it's a bit different: we lost ~20% performance due to the move to CUDA 2.0 compilers. The team says it's driver-related and NV is looking into it. I'm not sure if they'd publicly state if they eventually fix it, as that would mean publicly admitting the problem existed in the first place. That's the main reason why I'm curious about performance changes with every new driver release. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
[SETI.USA]Tank_MasterSend message Joined: 8 Jul 07 Posts: 85 Credit: 67,463,387 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There are also new Beta drivers (at least when I selected vista x64 for my geforce 8800 gts 512) version 180.42 Dated Oct 21 (today!) I am d/ling them now, and will try then out in a few min. |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 33 Credit: 3,233,174 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
178.24 no problems, no changes in comp. time. |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Hi, Please do post your experiences with the 180 beta drivers. Cheers, MJH |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 121 Credit: 59,836,411 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They're out. Did anyone test them yet? It's somewhat unfortunate timing, as a driver switch will now coincide with the new 6.48 client, so observing performance changes will be difficult. Hi I change my 8800GTS512 to GTX260 it is very nice card :) so on 178.24 i have 28230 seconds per WU. CPU Q6600@2968Mhz, also runing Roseetta@4cores + 1 gpugrid (5 tasks together)... |
[SETI.USA]Tank_MasterSend message Joined: 8 Jul 07 Posts: 85 Credit: 67,463,387 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
what are you going to do the the 8800? |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 121 Credit: 59,836,411 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I sell it on allegro.pl :) OMG my last task take: 31234.688 s and Time per step: 36.747 ms sometimes it's taking 27000 sometimes 31000 hmmmm |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sow how about present moment? Should we use new drivers or not? What can you say based on your experience in this new drivers? Or any other fresh drivers? |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Looks like the 178.24 is not any different for GPU-Grid than the previous ones, so feel free to use it or not. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra