Message boards :
Number crunching :
Error While Computing With My New GPU
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Logan CarrSend message Joined: 12 Aug 15 Posts: 240 Credit: 64,069,811 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hello all, Yesterday I got myself a new gtx 960 from Best Buy and I ran a project with it for 19 hours. It appears that I woke up today and the project is off of my computer, but according to the website had it came as an error. Any way I can fix this? Thank you. |
Logan CarrSend message Joined: 12 Aug 15 Posts: 240 Credit: 64,069,811 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Anyone, please? |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It may be overclocked too much. http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3299#28672 |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1266MHz might be too high as a base clock (FOC) - reference is 1127 (base)/1178 (Boost)MHz. You could use a tool such as MSI Afterburner to reduce the frequency. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
Logan CarrSend message Joined: 12 Aug 15 Posts: 240 Credit: 64,069,811 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1266MHz might be too high as a base clock (FOC) - reference is 1127 (base)/1178 (Boost)MHz. How can I underclock it when MSI afterburner says my core clock is "0"? |
Logan CarrSend message Joined: 12 Aug 15 Posts: 240 Credit: 64,069,811 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It may be overclocked too much. Hmmm, I see it talks about clean install drivers. Do you know what the best driver is for nvidia cards on this website, or are each different? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
359.6 are fastest for version of CUDA this project is running. I would also lower your "additional work" buffer to 0.2 and "Store up to an additional" to 0 so that you can finish each WU in the 24hr deadline for full bonus. |
Logan CarrSend message Joined: 12 Aug 15 Posts: 240 Credit: 64,069,811 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
359.6 are fastest for version of CUDA this project is running. I don't see an option where it says "additional work" but I see the 2nd option you posted and I changed that to 0 Do you mean "store up to at least "" days of work"? mine is already set up to 0.1 Thanks |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is a discussion of the driver issue, and yes it is 359.06: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=4319 And you can obtain a zero buffer size by setting the GPUGrid resource share to zero: https://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3986#39554 |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
359.6 are fastest for version of CUDA this project is running. "Store at least set to = 0.2 "Additional work" set to = 0 |
Logan CarrSend message Joined: 12 Aug 15 Posts: 240 Credit: 64,069,811 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thank you both I greatly appreciate it. So far everything looks fine. |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra