Message boards :
Server and website :
Nearly impossible to UPLOAD
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nearly impossible to UPLOAD results and Website extremely SLOW. |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Mar 14 Posts: 101 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
fixed? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Cause and solution? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The cause seemed to be something to do with the projects side Jacob. So I can't tell you anymore than for a brief period of time the site was very slow and I couldn't complete upload of the big file of a WU. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Right. I was hoping Gerard would supply the cause/solution. Thanks though. |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Dec 12 Posts: 84 Credit: 1,663,883,415 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My upload is stuck. Been trying for 48 minutes. Anyone else having problems? |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Uploading no problem any more, but now downloading a new WU, seems not to work it is trying for hours and only 20% is done. Greetings from TJ |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Uploading no problem any more, but now downloading a new WU, seems not to work it is trying for hours and only 20% is done. I've also been having major problems with downloads for quite a while. The problem seems to be with the *-coor_file. It will partially download and then hang for hours, causing the GPU to be idle and also miss bonus deadlines. This is happening on ALL of my machines, with various versions of BOINC, various hardware, various drivers. Often the only way to get the "coor" file downloaded is to disable and re-enable network communication (sometimes several times before the file completely downloads). How to solve this problem? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have this problem as well and the only way I can cure it faster than letting it do it itself is wait until the download goes to (about 6 mins) "retry" from "active" and click "Retry Now" |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have this problem as well and the only way I can cure it faster than letting it do it itself is wait until the download goes to (about 6 mins) "retry" from "active" and click "Retry Now" Another way is to use the 'Activity' menu: suspend network activity, then return to your normal setting. You can set that any time, as soon as you notice the download has stalled - even if the status is still listed as 'active'. If this happens on remote machines where you can't intervene manually, you could try setting the <http_transfer_timeout>seconds</http_transfer_timeout> Client Configuration Option to a lower figure, like 60 seconds. Use with care: I haven't needed this myself, so I can't vouch for it personally. But it should save you 4 minutes before the start of each retry |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have this problem as well and the only way I can cure it faster than letting it do it itself is wait until the download goes to (about 6 mins) "retry" from "active" and click "Retry Now" Thanks for the tips. The problem seems to be with the -coor_file and also the -vel_file (interesting that both are the same size). Very occasionally another GPUGrid DL file may fail. I've seen this happen ONLY at GPUGrid and have experienced it on no other projects. Hard to believe it's not a server misconfiguration here. I'm trying your client configuration suggestion and also another cc_config option . This stalling problem is happening on every GPUGrid download and can leave the GPUs idle for hours. I have GPUGrid project priority set to 0 (the only NVidia project) to try to make some of the bonus times, something that is becoming harder as the WU size has so quickly increased. It would be nice if the bonus deadlines were increased a bit also, as it would solve some issues. I'll report back with the results. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Can anything be done about the connectivity issues at GPUGrid? Beside the download timeouts, I now have 11 WUs that are now trying to upload. While they are slowly progressing, the keyword is slowly. Even if I pause all other uploads I can't even get any single UL to progress at over 17Kbps. Here's 2 WUs that finished over 6 hours ago but are still uploading: GPUGRID e11s49_e2s8p0f47-GERARD_FXCXCL12R_1480490_1-0-1-RND0590_0 21:39:53 5/25/2016 3:53:55 AM 0.939C + 1NV (d1) Uploading GPUGRID e11s41_e10s25p0f697-GERARD_FXCXCL12R_1480490_1-0-1-RND2403_0 21:33:05 5/25/2016 3:53:55 AM 0.939C + 1NV (d0) Uploading The completion times are both under 21:40 but they've now missed the 1 day deadline and are still not nearly uploaded. My internet connection is DSL and not very fast (even by monopolistic USA standards) but it's the top speed available in my area. In fact I spent two days twisting some arms to get provisioned at over what is supposedly the top speed. That still doesn't account for the miserable UL speeds I'm seeing. How can we be expected to meet the tight deadlines under these conditions? It's frustrating... Edit: Now 12 WUs uploading. |
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Particularly lovely are all the transient upload (and download) failures: "GPUGRID 5/25/2016 12:09:02 PM Temporarily failed upload of e11s41_e10s25p0f697-GERARD_FXCXCL12R_1480490_1-0-1-RND2403_0_9: transient HTTP error" Then BOINC backs off for a crazy amount of time (in this case 4 hours and 25 minutes) , leaving the 99,995k upload stalled at 99.394% complete: "GPUGRID 5/25/2016 12:09:02 PM Backing off 04:25:27 on upload of e11s41_e10s25p0f697-GERARD_FXCXCL12R_1480490_1-0-1-RND2403_0_9" Is there any way to modify or disable this BOINC behavior? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 May 13 Posts: 187 Credit: 349,254,454 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't know whether you can change some configuration option and make BOINC behave more sanely in this respect by itself, but the best manual approach I've found to mitigate this is to disable and re-enable network activity. All uploads / downloads resume immediately, disregarding the back-off times.
|
BeyondSend message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've been doing that but the file transfers are timing out constantly. I'm babysitting it WAY too much. Turns out that it can be controlled but as far as I can see you have to start BOINC from the command console. The command is in this format (when using from a windows shortcut): "D:\Program Files\BOINC\boinc.exe" --pers_retry_delay_max 300 It does work. The last number is in seconds. Give it enough time so that the file is unlocked on the server. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Missing GERARD_FXCXCL12R task: Task, http://84.89.134.145/result.php?resultid=15112472 Work Unit There was no sign of this ever being on my system. I guess it didn't get sent properly or just didn't download properly. Just saying in case some of the recent timeouts were due to tasks never arriving in the first place. If there was an increase in timeouts recently you might be able to see that server-side. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra