Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
GTX 460 and GTX 580 performance on long queue?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 09 Posts: 114 Credit: 589,114,683 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've not crunched in a while due to warm summer temperatures, however, with cooler temperatures approaching, I intend to start up again. At this point, a graphics card update is not in the picture for me - maybe next year. I am wondering what to expect if I start crunching long queue tasks again. When I last crunched, Gerards were taking about 38 hours on my 460 and about 20 hours on my 580. I thought that there was a place on the site where I could see performance by card, but that escapes me at the moment. I see that both cards are still in the "works reasonably well" category, so I am wondering what to expect? Thanks. |
|
Send message Joined: 23 Feb 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 376,031,297 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Gerards on my 570 cards, when i run them, usually take ~21 hours. 20 Hours or a little less on a 580 sounds reasonable to me. |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 09 Posts: 114 Credit: 589,114,683 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks. Based on your reply, it sounds like things have not changed much since I last crunched. It was early May, 2015 I think. |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Mar 14 Posts: 101 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
This thread gave me the idea of creating a WU return time per GPU type chart. Check it out in the performance tab. |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Nov 09 Posts: 114 Credit: 589,114,683 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi Gerard, Very nice! I was hoping for something like this. Thanks. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra