Message boards :
Server and website :
GIANNI_mornapadp workunits
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've noticed one such workunit on one of my hosts. It takes 11200 seconds (3 hours and 7 minutes) (~44%) more than a GERARD_FXCXCL12_LIG to process, while it gaves 4125 less credits. It has a very low GPU (GTX 980) usage (~86%) even on my WinXPx64 host. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It takes 11200 seconds (3 hours and 7 minutes) (~44%) more than a GERARD_FXCXCL12_LIG to process, while it gaves 4125 less credits. You're GIANNI time per step is 2.937ms. 45.2% faster than my 5.355ms. For both of us: the GIANNI runtimes are nearly 1.5 GERALD's WU's. On a 4 lane slot 970 at 1519MHz - I completed a GIANNI in 18.5hr which is 6hr more than my (1506Mhz) GERALD. My GIANNI 48% slower than you're 980. (Is the 980 on x16 lane and >1450Mhz?) It has a very low GPU (GTX 980) usage (~86%) even on my WinXPx64 host W8.1 only managed 73%. GPU was around 117W (7400 WU total BTU > 400BTU/h > 6.6BTU/min.) |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(Is the 980 on x16 lane and >1450Mhz?) My GTX980s are on PCIe3.0 x8 lanes, GPU clock is 1420MHz. At the moment my hosts are on vacation, because we have daytime outside temperatures around 37°C (99°F), and now I have 29.5°C (85°F) in my room (no AC). |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra