Message boards :
Number crunching :
NOELIA_467x WU completion time
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,739,145,728 RAC: 95,752 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have noticed that some of these units have a longer than usual completion time. Here is an example: e1s264_2-NOELIA_467x3-0-2-RND5553_0 11014243 21 Jun 2015 | 13:41:25 UTC 22 Jun 2015 | 13:10:27 UTC Completed and validated 78,734.91 72,640.97 165,000.00 Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.47 (cuda65) Compared to normal completion time: e1s57_1-NOELIA_467x2-0-2-RND4597_0 11015074 22 Jun 2015 | 4:00:34 UTC 22 Jun 2015 | 18:37:13 UTC Completed and validated 50,151.73 46,511.00 165,000.00 Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.47 (cuda65) There are several other units that my computers are working on currently, that are also this slow. The GERARD_FXCXCL12 units did not do this. In most cases, it is not the GPU clock speed, but it's GPU usage. I noticed that the GPU power usage is about 20 watts lower and the GPU temperature is about 10 degrees C lower. Does anybody else have this same issue? |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have four GTX 750 Tis on two machines (Win7 64-bit, 352.86 drivers). Four of the NOELIA_467x have completed, two on each machine. The times are all normal enough thus far, between 62,196.36 seconds and 62,715.91 seconds. https://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=194224&offset=0&show_names=1&state=0&appid= https://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=223541&offset=0&show_names=1&state=0&appid= The power is probably a little lower, but not that much on these cards, which run cool anyway. I don't see your card listed; maybe a driver update would help? |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jan 09 Posts: 670 Credit: 2,498,095,550 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My Noelia 467x's on GTX970 are taking twice as long as others in performance tab. This is on a machine that performance wise is very competitive on performance with other 970's on other WU's PS. I will be disapointed to lose my Lysine molecule when I get over 750 million because it seems like a very "masculine" molecule. :-) |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My Noelia 467x's on GTX970 are taking twice as long as others in performance tab. Currently the performance tab NOELIA_467x and 46 is stewed from the short 467 (46) WU also being included. This is on a machine that performance wise is very competitive on performance with other 970's on other WU's. You're (970) 467 long WU 27k/sec runtimes are still top notch. You certainly have one of - if not the fastest Single task at time WDDM OS 970 on GPUGRID. |
©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra