Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
First check of the 6.3.14
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Looks like the simplest calculation of the number of cores in a Quad CPU is a hard work. After starting the 6.3.14 only 3 tasks are running. So I had to create a new cc_config.xml to tell the program the real number of cores in my CPU. After the Entry ncpus=4 the program is running fine.
|
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Second comment to the 6.3.14: Finally the 6.3.14 don't eat memory when the BOINC-Manager is running under Vista 64 bit :) Please change the entry Aktiv (1.00 CPUs, 1 CUDA) to Aktiv (1.00 Cores, 1 CUDA) I think, you mean to control the feeding of the GPU is one core needed and not the whole CPU wirh all 4 cores ;) Question: Is the number of 2 cores hard coded in this version? I'm wondering, while 2 CPU tasks und one GPU tasks are running on a Quad if no ncpus-entry is available with the real number of cores in Windows. A team mate told me, on Linux the right number of tasks is started. I will ask back for a cc_config.xml. EDIT: He has running a cc_config.xml with ncpus=5, so I think, the Linux-Version has the same problem.
|
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've been running x2 hosts for about 3-4 hours. I just installed on 3rd host a few minutes ago. All are Windows XP x86 I did not want to post immediately until some testing had been done. However I have not had any problem so far and been in contact with the developer (Anderson) all day about it. I observed proper task switching when a CPU task ended another was started, so I was always left with max running tasks. The problem with reading the XML preferences file has been fixed and the proper venue is now used. XML is parsed correctly again. It seems to be good so far, It starts the proper number of tasks on initial start up, in my case without using ncpus setting I should have 2 and thats what I got. I did not have to do any suspending or other tinkering to get it to work. 1 CPU only and 1 CPU/CUDA task. You will note immediately CUDA tasks show as "Running (1.00 CPUs, 1 CUDA)". CPU only tasks just show as "Running". This amount of CPU used can be set by the project, currently 1.00. The behavior is suppose to be: Anderson wrote: The intended behavior (which I think we've finally achieved) |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Second comment to the 6.3.14: No linux version of 6.3.14 has been made yet. There hasn't been a linux version made since 6.3.10. The number of cores is not hard coded in any version. You can limit it with your preferences, cc_config.xml or global_prefs_override.xml files. Check your preferences and any files you might have modified and make sure they are set to use 100% of CPU's and correct values for such things as ncpus. |
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I've installed the 6.3.14 on a second PC, also on Vista 64 bit. There are 4 tasks running. This PC has a 8800GT. Don't know, why the other only 3 tasks has running without a cc_config.xml at the first start. I've deleted the entry in the cc_config of the other PC with the GTX280 and after the restart now also 4 tasks are running. The CPU is set to 100% on both PCs.
|
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If you have the sources and the changes and a compiler ... ;)
|
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Another remark to the 6.3.14: The temperature of my GTX280 is dropped from 79°C to 72°C. In the past this only happens with ncpus=5 and a longer running time per WU. I'm really agog for the new time per step, the last with the 6.3.10 was 34.438 ms.
|
|
Send message Joined: 28 Sep 08 Posts: 27 Credit: 6,201,632,872 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You will note immediately CUDA tasks show as "Running (1.00 CPUs, 1 CUDA)". CPU only tasks just show as "Running". This amount of CPU used can be set by the project, currently 1.00. Do you know when/if the CPU amount will be changed to lower than 1, for somebody, such as myself, who prefers to maximize the number of CPU tasks instead of having one tied up in each GPU task? |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Once a new BOINC release proves to work we will reduce the cpu usage to less than one. We will also need to upload the new Windows and Linux application. These things are better separated by an interval to detect problems. It will be up to you to decide if use the CPU it or not (It depends on the speed of your GPU). GDF |
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The first WU only running under 6.3.14 is ready: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=75290 # Time per step: 35.483 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 30160.337 s Looks good!
|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is as before, isn't it? gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Apr 08 Posts: 113 Credit: 1,656,514,857 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
...... where can I get 6.3.14? Thanks! |
DoctorNowSend message Joined: 18 Aug 07 Posts: 83 Credit: 135,208,752 RAC: 4 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
...... where can I get 6.3.14? Try a look here: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/?C=M;O=D Member of BOINC@Heidelberg and ATA!
|
KokomikoSend message Joined: 18 Jul 08 Posts: 190 Credit: 24,093,690 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This is as before, isn't it? Nearly, a little bit slower ... 6.3.14 - # Time per step: 35.483 ms ... and the last 3 WUs without a ncpu-entry with the 6.3.10 6.3.10 - # Time per step: 34.438 ms 6.3.10 - # Time per step: 34.608 ms 6.3.10 - # Time per step: 34.547 ms
|
|
Send message Joined: 17 Apr 08 Posts: 113 Credit: 1,656,514,857 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
.....Got it - thanks. |
Stefan LedwinaSend message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 464 Credit: 298,573,998 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My first result crunched with 6.3.14 is uploaded - http://www.ps3grid.net/result.php?resultid=75292 It took about 43.6ms/step which is about the same speed than with previous BOINC versions (was always between 43 -45 ms/step). pixelicious.at - my little photoblog |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 08 Posts: 55 Credit: 1,475,857 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]()
|
Worked like a charm, 4 tasks, 3 cpu and 1 gpu. Did the cc_config.xml to 5 cpus and now its 4 cpu, 1 gpu. Will have to wait a day or two to average the performance. |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,174,624,885 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I installed the new 6.3.14 this morning and it immediately Trashed the 4 PS3 Wu on the Computer and has Trashed every one since then. Going back to 6.3.10 hasn't helped either as it now Trashes any PS3 Wu I download ... All I get is Computation Errors with the following message: <core_client_version>6.3.10</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using CUDA device 0 Cuda error in file 'deviceQuery.cu' in line 59 : out of memory. <core_client_version>6.3.14</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> # Using CUDA device 0 Cuda error in file 'deviceQuery.cu' in line 59 : out of memory. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
out of memory Did you reboot your machine? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
ayQueSend message Joined: 6 Sep 08 Posts: 18 Credit: 806,771 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
...did install v6.3.14 yesterday - everything is running fine ... :-) speed is the same (as I supposed). On a 32 bit Windows XP prof. SP 3 nice job! |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra