Message boards :
News :
New Beta app for AMD GPUs
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 . . . 14 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 14 Posts: 152 Credit: 918,557,369 RAC: 19,063 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I3 4130 (2 cores, HT off, I've checked, it's faster without it), Radeon 7790. AVG GPU load 48-51%, depends on WU. |
Send message Joined: 23 May 09 Posts: 121 Credit: 400,300,664 RAC: 13,043 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On my oldest machine 3/4 of the wu's fail with -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005) Unknown error number http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13789647 http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13786661 http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13783126 all fail with - Unhandled Exception Record - Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x000000013F483B37 read attempt to address 0x0C4D5EB0 Its a AMD Phenom X4 with an AMD HD6950 GPU. Running win7 x64 Same setup works with HD7770 or on an A10 7700. Might be an issue with older hardware. I will change my setup. BTW, still getting 915 wu's, not 916. |
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 14 Posts: 152 Credit: 918,557,369 RAC: 19,063 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Same here. |
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 295,172 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Try again. The Applications page says that 9.17 was deployed at 13:40 UTC today. |
Send message Joined: 25 Mar 12 Posts: 103 Credit: 14,948,929,771 RAC: 11,649 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've finished the first wu with sucess using 9.17 in a dual 7950 system. So, good progress :)) |
![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 09 Posts: 76 Credit: 114,610,402 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My Win 8.1 box completed successfully a work unit. It used 95-98% of CPU and 50-63% of 1 GPU. Second GPU was not touched. I tried using the <exclude_gpu> in cc_config.xml and ran 2 e@h apps on other gpu. CPU usage by mdrun-917 went from 98% to 65% and GPU for GPUgrid wu went from 65% to 43%. When I suspended the E@H project the GPUgrid numbers returned. I know Vista was not listed on the list of OSes but my Vista box did get work units. Remaining time or completed time is always 100% and there is some activity on CPU, erratic and only a few spikes on GPU occasionally. I will disable it from getting apps unless you want to continue testing Vista 64bit. Cheers! |
![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 09 Posts: 76 Credit: 114,610,402 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Vista 64bit 2x 7870 6 core CPU. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
My Win 8.1 box completed successfully a work unit. It used 95-98% of CPU and 50-63% of 1 GPU. Second GPU was not touched. Jobs will only ever run on the first GPU. <exclude_gpu> is not respected.
We can't support Vista. If it works good, but if not, better just disable it. Matt |
![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 09 Posts: 76 Credit: 114,610,402 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My Win 8.1 box completed successfully a work unit. It used 95-98% of CPU and 50-63% of 1 GPU. Second GPU was not touched. That's cool. Just trying to be helpful. Not sure what info helps. Cheers! |
Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have one rig with AMD Hainan running 'POEM++ OpenCL version v2.17 (opencl_ati_101)' and 'OpenCL for AMD GPUs v9.15 (mt)' at the same time. http://www.gpugrid.net/show_host_detail.php?hostid=196913 |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
I have one rig with AMD Hainan running 'POEM++ OpenCL version v2.17 (opencl_ati_101)' and 'OpenCL for AMD GPUs v9.15 (mt)' at the same time. Yes, that's because as far as BOINC is concerned our AMD GPU app is a CPU-only app. If you're not happy with the two tasks sharing the GPU, your best option is to opt out of the AMD GPU app. Matt |
Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thats ok. I like them both. |
Send message Joined: 15 Apr 14 Posts: 5 Credit: 6,433,630 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
I've heard people on here say the app isn't well optimized yet, and I wonder if it's simply not scaling with GPU power at the moment. On my system, it seems to run consistently at around 35 minutes each My specs are as follows CPU: Intel i7-4710HQ http://ark.intel.com/products/78930/Intel-Core-i7-4710HQ-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_50-GHz GPU: AMD Radeon R9 M265X http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Radeon-R9-M265X.114535.0.html RAM: 16 GB @ 1600 MHz SSD: Toshiba Q-series (256 GB) I've got it set for 5 threads, so it can potentially use a little HT if it helps. If it doesn't, for most apps its not much of a performance hit. I also have the CPU set not to exceed 2.45 GHz, for thermal reasons. Afterburner says the GPU utilization is about 74.25% As of right now, I believe I'm CPU limited. If I allow the CPU to use Turbo Boost, it will go up to 2.9 GHz and the GPU utilization will increase to 78% On my Nvidia system, with the 650M, utilization is usually around 90%, so, 74% isn't too far off. Although the Nvidia app uses almost no CPU resources, it typically takes 23 hours to return even the smallests WUs on the laptop I rather like the behavior of the AMD app using the CPU/GPU in unison. What is the average run time for the AMD beta tasks? and what kind of utilization and bottlenecks are you guys encountering? |
Send message Joined: 23 May 09 Posts: 121 Credit: 400,300,664 RAC: 13,043 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The situation is different between laptop an desktop pc well developed app and beta app Most posts refer to desktop pc's. It's usually no problem to run them @ 95% gpu load 7/24 and that's what people like to see. The beta app uses on my HD7770 not more than 55% regardless how many of the 4 cpu's are involved. This is why I try to run 2 wu's on the gpu. I would prefer to run two gpugrid app at a time but this is inhibited by system settings. So I try to run 2 different apps on the gpu which works fine now since 2 days. The goals are different for Matt and the volunteers. Matt tryes to have a stable app and will try to optimize it later. I want my gpu's to run near 100%. You want to keep your notebook alive by limiting the temp. Alexander |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
I've heard people on here say the app isn't well optimized yet, and I wonder if it's simply not scaling with GPU power at the moment. This application is quite different to ACEMD. Whereas ACEMD really only needs a good GPU, this new one needs a good GPU, good CPU *and* good PCIe connectivity. Inevitably, one of these will be a bottleneck - I'd never expect to see full utilisation of CPU and GPU- a realistic aim is to have both above 75%. The current WUs are deliberately very short, so we get quick returns and good stats on failure rates. Production work is probably a month or two away, but we'll ramp up WU sizes between now and then. Matt |
Send message Joined: 10 Oct 11 Posts: 13 Credit: 192,770,371 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can't wait till full production. Until then my 5960x and 290x are happily curching away. |
Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 209 Credit: 5,496,860,456 RAC: 8,582,660 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a machine with two 7970s. The app appears to be using only one. Is this expected? It won't use them both? Edit: Also, it uses only 8 threads on a 12 thread machine. I have no restrictions set in any .xml files. Arg 0 [projects/www.gpugrid.net/mdrun-917.exe] CPU load confirms only 8 of 12. Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A little down in this thread: My Win 8.1 box completed successfully a work unit. It used 95-98% of CPU and 50-63% of 1 GPU. Second GPU was not touched. So yes only on GPU is used. Greetings from TJ |
Send message Joined: 24 Jan 09 Posts: 42 Credit: 16,676,387 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Working. Gpu usage is little bit over 50%. It using all of my 4 theards. http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13800417 |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 09 Posts: 7 Credit: 78,506 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Matt are you working on the Access Violation problem? http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13790793 http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13795778 http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13801334 http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13801633 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra