Message boards :
News :
WARNING/CHALLENGE: VERY LONG WU (VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 5 Dec 12 Posts: 84 Credit: 1,663,883,415 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Knocked it out in 5 hours ... EVGA GeForce 980 .. no sweat This appears to be the only task you've ever done: 854-NOELIA_PNP-5-10-RND5715_0 |
Send message Joined: 1 Mar 10 Posts: 147 Credit: 1,077,535,540 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi ! Got 1 VERYLONG e few days ago : http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13744487 Titan Black Ghz Edition ADAPTIVE , 1176Mhz Core Clk, 6Ghz Mem Clk, 73°C, 43% Fan speed . GPU 79,604.53 (roughly 22h 7mn) CPU 22,063.62 Credit 500000 PS : Gerard gives less credits than others for his WUs ! This is not very much "paid" got the spent time ! Regards Lubuntu 16.04.1 LTS x64 |
![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jan 15 Posts: 7 Credit: 402,017,837 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes.. just started/joined yesterday late afternoon.. :) |
Send message Joined: 5 Dec 12 Posts: 84 Credit: 1,663,883,415 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Welcome Tiger and great to have you as a fellow volunteer. This forum is about the CXCL12_confAna tasks from a week ago. NOELIA_PNP is a different project and has a very different runtime. |
![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jan 15 Posts: 7 Credit: 402,017,837 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanx Dale .. I'm off to the NOELIA thread .. happy crunching |
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,731,645,728 RAC: 52,725 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It seems to me that the WUs are getting longer at faster pace than the video cards are increasing in speed. I have one suggestion for this, create the ability to run these very long WUs on more than one video card at a time. This would seem to me to be a more prudent use resources than the multi-CPU apps. |
![]() Send message Joined: 8 Nov 13 Posts: 56 Credit: 1,002,640,163 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is their a way to select to run GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna Tasks? I would like to run 4 at once on 4 GTX 980 HC Graphics Cards. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is their a way to select to run GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna Tasks? No. |
![]() Send message Joined: 8 Nov 13 Posts: 56 Credit: 1,002,640,163 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is their a way to select to run GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna Tasks? Thanks for the info. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 462 Credit: 958,266,958 RAC: 31,461 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh no had two i saw now. Disk limit exceed after 120k und. 135k computing ^^ outsch seems i must adjust something for the future because i use only 40gb disks on some boinc machines O.o DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at ![]() |
Send message Joined: 31 Jan 15 Posts: 2 Credit: 10,877,525 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
Everything runs smoothly. Temp of my CPU (i7 4770k) = 55C-59C Temp of my GPU (MSI GTX 770 twin frozr) = 61C-70C Both without overclocking. I increased the Fan speed of the GPU to 70% and the temp is stable at 62C. Power of GPU = 60% GPU use = 88% All while 3 monitors are connected. 27" at 1920x1080 on DVI port 24" at 1920x1200 on VGA port 22" at 1680x1050 on HDMI port (using a HAMA HDMI-VGA interface) The system has been running non-stop between jan 31, 14:55 and feb 3, 16:54 and completed 7 long run tasks. Running 2 projects. GPUGRID and rosetta@home |
Send message Joined: 7 Jun 12 Posts: 112 Credit: 1,140,895,172 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
pretty, early in the morning, first and successful :-) Why was this task canceled . That's what mean ?! A couple of weeks has been recognized as correctly calculated and is now cleared. and on the performance board is also deleted. |
Send message Joined: 7 Nov 14 Posts: 8 Credit: 109,979,264 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What do you call good graphic cards? Mines gtx 650 Nvidia |
Send message Joined: 5 Dec 12 Posts: 84 Credit: 1,663,883,415 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The number in the hundred's slot represents the generation, and the number in the ten's slot is the relative strength compared to other cards within that generation. Here's a handy chart of their relative usefulness for you, cira Febrary 2nd, 2015: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gaming-graphics-card-review,3107-7.html It doesn't take heat or power consumption into account, but for GPUgrid, you probably should. Roughly, the newer generations are better. |
Send message Joined: 7 Jun 12 Posts: 112 Credit: 1,140,895,172 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
pretty, early in the morning, first and successful :-) I ask one more time to explain the disappearance of this task and remove it from the board performance. You are able for the intelligent conversation? |
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 326,008 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
pretty, early in the morning, first and successful :-) All tasks, at all BOINC projects, are purged from the online database after a pre-determined period of time - otherwise the database would grow to an unmanageable size, and performance would slow to a crawl. The oldest valid task in my own current list is dated 28 January: I think we can take it that the 'purge interval' at this project is 10 days, although some projects use 24 hours or even less. Your 26 January task is simply too old to be retained in the online transactional database: that does not mean that it has been 'cancelled' - the science will have been moved to another place, and your credits will be retained in your totals. |
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 08 Posts: 183 Credit: 10,085,929,375 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, I completed 2 of these verylong WUs and the one that was completed in the shortest time is no longer on the performance board either. I can't find them in my completed WUs list either. I guess those WUs are cleared after ~2 weeks? EDIT: Thanks for the info on this Richard. I think we posted at the same time. I guess these are also purged from the performance database too? |
Send message Joined: 7 Jun 12 Posts: 112 Credit: 1,140,895,172 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Do not do this by himself uncomprehendingly richard..... the whole world sees that I was f*** out. from performance tab Pharmaceutical companies are not as scientists. are mainly businessmen. When I start here so longtime volunteer warned me before im start of supporting gpu grid. Now I see you were right. I do not need rac performance. on it are different here as volunteers protectionist complain of BU. |
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I do not understand you, Jozef. Richard's explanation was correct, so far as I know. |
Send message Joined: 2 Nov 14 Posts: 1 Credit: 103,700,063 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm running Intel Core i7-4790 CPU @4.00GHz with NVIDIA GeForce GTX980. Would something like this be able to help you guy out? |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra