Message boards :
News :
WARNING/CHALLENGE: VERY LONG WU (VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 295,172 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'd be fascinated to hear how well we did with the original 400-WU research challenge over the weekend, after that slightly shaky start. |
Send message Joined: 26 Mar 14 Posts: 101 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Before anything, we would like to apologize for the big mess of this last weekend. It obviously was a peculiar situation and as such, our settings proved not to be correctly prepared for it. I hope we have learned the lesson. About the results, I just correctly fetched around 50% of the WU I was expecting (~200) and they are ready to be analysed. If someone is interested in this particular experiment: we are trying to assess the conformational behavior of a chemokine named CXCL12, related to a vast number of diseases including different types of cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and autoinmune disorders. By analysing the conformational changes occurring in a scale of 200ns (the length of the simulations you just crunched) we are aiming to unravel new surfaces and druggable protein pockets that we can use to design drugs against. Molecular simulations are, perhaps at exception of some NMR techniques, the only way of atomically determining the protein conformational space at such small scales and thus provide a unique insight into the natural dynamics of proteins. Thanks again for your big crunching contribution and such fantastic forum support. |
Send message Joined: 7 Jun 12 Posts: 112 Credit: 1,140,895,172 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
pretty, early in the morning, first and successful :-) 13744739 10583385 25 Jan 2015 | 2:12:05 UTC 26 Jan 2015 | 5:10:58 UTC Completed and validated 75,488.86 28,692.76 500,000.00.- http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13744739 |
Send message Joined: 13 Feb 11 Posts: 25 Credit: 7,516,466,698 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hello. I got one too and is already fixed, so my gtx 970 can crunch all night long. Thanks guys for quick fix-up. |
Send message Joined: 28 Nov 13 Posts: 17 Credit: 153,786,987 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
confirmed new very longs are fixed. seems like these ones have low atom count - only 95% power use at 1.5Ghz 970X |
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 12 Posts: 40 Credit: 186,780,650 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So I get home from a work trip and see a very long running on my GTX 750. The task is at 49 hours and 77%. Despite missing the bonus. We should all get the bonus if we are putting in the time. I want it to finish. Looks like 15 hours to go. I notice the 750 was stuck at 400Mhz so I rebooted twice and it went back up to 1250Mhz. Not sure why or how long it ran at 400 but it is fixed now. My question is: do I need to edit the text files for this to upload or will it go on its own now. I don't want all of this time to go to waste. Thanks for any help. |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My question is: do I need to edit the text files for this to upload or will it go on its own now. I don't want all of this time to go to waste. I'd for sure check it according to the instructions above. I fixed 3 of them and they all finished fine. Without the fix they would have failed. Two more were already fixed, so did 5 in all. Don't care to see any more of these mammoths: aborted the last 3 received so they could run on faster cards. Your 750 time sounds about right as my 750Ti cards completed 4 of them, finishing in 48.5-50.5 hours. My lone 670 ran faster, about 38.5 hours. |
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 12 Posts: 40 Credit: 186,780,650 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't know about you but I am very impressed with the 750. I can overclock the proc by 50 and the memory by 1 Ghz with no problem. Best card for $80 ever. |
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 12 Posts: 40 Credit: 186,780,650 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is what I found in my config file: <file> <name>10x40-GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna-0-1-RND4988_1_9</name> <nbytes>0.000000</nbytes> <max_nbytes>512000000.000000</max_nbytes> <status>0</status> <upload_url>http://www.gpugrid.org/PS3GRID_cgi/file_upload_handler</upload_url> </file> Does this look right? It has 512 instead of 128. |
Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1639 Credit: 10,159,968,649 RAC: 295,172 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Does this look right? It has 512 instead of 128. Yes, that one should run through to the end and report normally, everything else being equal. No action needed on your part. |
Send message Joined: 20 Jul 14 Posts: 732 Credit: 130,089,082 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Before anything, we would like to apologize for the big mess of this last weekend. It obviously was a peculiar situation and as such, our settings proved not to be correctly prepared for it. I hope we have learned the lesson. Thanks Gerard for the heads-up and these details about this research :) Really appreciated. [CSF] Thomas H.V. Dupont Founder of the team CRUNCHERS SANS FRONTIERES 2.0 www.crunchersansfrontieres |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jul 14 Posts: 225 Credit: 2,658,976,345 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It looks like I just got a brand new one 3 hours ago and I am crunching it now with the highest prio. 10.901% at 3:00:00 on my device 2 of 0,1,2. 1 Corinthians 9:16 "For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!" Ephesians 6:18-20, please ;-) http://tbc-pa.org |
Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 121 Credit: 59,836,411 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 12 Posts: 40 Credit: 186,780,650 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ERRRRRRR. 217,000 secs of compute for nothing. It says error while computing. That was a waste. Yes, I am frustrated. I know I shouldn't be but 60 hours of compute down the drain. Don't know why. Any ideas? http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13744228 http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13744228[url][/url] |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ERRRRRRR. 217,000 secs of compute for nothing. It says error while computing. That was a waste. Yes, I am frustrated. I know I shouldn't be but 60 hours of compute down the drain. Don't know why. Any ideas? This task's log contains a lot of error messages: # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 36378000) ... SWAN : FATAL : Cuda driver error 715 in file 'swanlibnv2.cpp' in line 1965. # SWAN swan_assert 0 ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 37079000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 37133000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 37963000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 41979000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 42124000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 42709000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 42718000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 43071000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 44636000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 44846000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 45046000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) # Attempting restart (step 48215000) ... # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) Probably it's overclocked, and it can't take that much of that. Its temperature doesn't go over 73°C, so it's not overheating. You should either decrease the GPU clock by 10-20-50MHz, or increase the GPU voltage by 25mV (increase its power target). But I don't recommend the latter. |
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 12 Posts: 40 Credit: 186,780,650 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good to know. Thanks for looking into it. Guess the overclock is too much. |
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A good test for overclocking stability, is to see if Heaven 4.0 can run for 5 solid hours without any freezing and without any TDRs logged in C:\Windows\LiveKernelReports\WATCHDOG. Keep downclocking in 13 Mhz intervals, until you are sure it is rock solid in that test case :) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jul 14 Posts: 225 Credit: 2,658,976,345 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re- issued task due to time-out past deadline of original release. 26.60 hours, finished with no errors. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There's another longer than usual batch called GERARD_CXCL12_confAnaFX_ada2, it took 9 hours for my GTX780Ti to complete. It's granted 251,400 credits (including the 50% bonus). |
![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jan 15 Posts: 7 Credit: 402,017,837 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Knocked it out in 5 hours ... EVGA GeForce 980 .. no sweat |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra