WARNING/CHALLENGE: VERY LONG WU (VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna)

Message boards : News : WARNING/CHALLENGE: VERY LONG WU (VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next

AuthorMessage
RaymondFO*

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 12
Posts: 72
Credit: 14,040,706,346
RAC: 0
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39672 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 5:52:46 UTC - in response to Message 39639.  
Last modified: 24 Jan 2015, 5:54:20 UTC

4) Find the file 'client_state.xml' in your BOINC Data folder. Under Windows, this is likely - if you accepted the default installation setting - to be C:\Programdata\BOINC: under Linux, it might be /var/lib/boinc


For linux, the file is under "/var/lib/boinc-client". You should be able to edit the file in terminal using "sudo nano".
ID: 39672 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile 2DJFcFTcRK5gHhxpndmdMJorY9Y3
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Nov 12
Posts: 10
Credit: 792,812,843
RAC: 0
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39677 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 14:53:35 UTC

Hi,

I got an upload error for one of long running tasks. Any Boinc infrastructure limit reached?


Task:
10583226 3x24-GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna-0-1-RND1384_0

Error Msg:
12:58:29 (8716): called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
<message>
upload failure: <file_xfer_error>
<file_name>3x24-GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna-0-1-RND1384_0_9</file_name>
<error_code>-131 (file size too big)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>

Georg
ID: 39677 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Richard Haselgrove

Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 09
Posts: 1639
Credit: 10,159,968,649
RAC: 351
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39678 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 15:43:47 UTC - in response to Message 39677.  

Hi,

I got an upload error for one of long running tasks. Any Boinc infrastructure limit reached?

No, not an actual BOINC intrinsic limit, just a configuration oversight in this particular model run. Read on further down this thread.
ID: 39678 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
TJ

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 09
Posts: 815
Credit: 1,470,385,294
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39679 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 16:36:33 UTC
Last modified: 24 Jan 2015, 16:38:36 UTC

Errors can happen, so no hard feeling to the research project.
Unfortunately I was away yesterday when Zoltan mentioned the issue and together with Richard, a solution was given.

Mine finished in error before I could intervene, thus about 24hours wasted on my two fastest cards.

Edit: Repair the WU's Gerard, issue them again and I will let them crunch again on my rigs.
Greetings from TJ
ID: 39679 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Dr. A

Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 10
Posts: 1
Credit: 87,885,612
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39682 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 17:33:22 UTC

mine also finished with result upload error:

upload failure: <file_xfer_error>
<file_name>3x1-GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna-0-1-RND5972_0_9</file_name>
<error_code>-131 (file size too big)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
ID: 39682 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
sarge104

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 13
Posts: 5
Credit: 7,420,264
RAC: 0
Level
Ser
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39683 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 18:38:41 UTC

For those that can't be bothered to read through the topic...Your fix for the "old" WU's.

http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3988&nowrap=true#39636

Crunch on! Thanks again to the awesome people that gave their time and energy for solving this issue in a timely manner! :D
ID: 39683 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Richard Haselgrove

Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 09
Posts: 1639
Credit: 10,159,968,649
RAC: 351
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39684 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 18:47:33 UTC - in response to Message 39683.  

ID: 39684 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 12
Posts: 819
Credit: 1,591,285,971
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39685 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 19:02:41 UTC - in response to Message 39636.  
Last modified: 24 Jan 2015, 19:03:16 UTC

OK, so here are the KISS ('Keep it simple, stupid') instructions.
1) Check if you are running a GPUGrid task with 'GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna' in the task name - or if you have one waiting to start. If you can't see one anywhere, relax and do nothing (except maybe open a beer).

That worked for a while, but I picked up one this morning on my GTX 660 Ti, so apparently it is not foolproof.

It is now 10 hours into a 40-hour run. However, the DB fix that Toni mentioned was included in the files that were downloaded, so I have:
<max_nbytes>512000000.000000</max_nbytes>

We will see if it all works. Thanks for the tips though.
ID: 39685 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Richard Haselgrove

Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 09
Posts: 1639
Credit: 10,159,968,649
RAC: 351
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39686 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 19:08:23 UTC - in response to Message 39685.  

Provided the _1_9 file has the increased <max_nbytes> 512,000,000 you should be fine (_1 in this case, because it's a resent task).
ID: 39686 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 12
Posts: 819
Credit: 1,591,285,971
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39687 - Posted: 24 Jan 2015, 19:20:33 UTC - in response to Message 39686.  

Yes, it is the _1_9 file.
<name>7x27-GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna-0-1-RND7320_1_9</name>

I don't know if a GTX 660 Ti is really worth doing it on, but since it started and a lot of others have errored out, I figured it would be the fastest way to get a result back.
ID: 39687 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Beyond
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 08
Posts: 1112
Credit: 6,162,416,256
RAC: 0
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39691 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 1:05:56 UTC - in response to Message 39687.  
Last modified: 25 Jan 2015, 1:14:14 UTC

I don't know if a GTX 660 Ti is really worth doing it on,

I would think not a great proposition. I unfortunately have 4 of these running on my 750Ti cards. Didn't try to get them. The first one finished in 48.5 hours so 400k credits, no bonuses made it far less than simply running the normal WUs. That combined with the chance of erroring out, I hope we've seen the last of these. Anyway, I'd reserve these guys for only the very fastest GPUs and limit them to those.
ID: 39691 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jim1348

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 12
Posts: 819
Credit: 1,591,285,971
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39693 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 2:23:28 UTC - in response to Message 39691.  

Quite true, but we don't have much flexibility here. Once they start, we may not catch them for a few hours as we both know. Then we have to decide whether to keep going or not. With the lack of any guidance, it is anyone's guess. I am sure they will think of a better way to do it next time.
ID: 39693 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Beyond
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Nov 08
Posts: 1112
Credit: 6,162,416,256
RAC: 0
Level
Tyr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39694 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 3:04:35 UTC - in response to Message 39693.  

Just got another one, but this time I could shunt it off to my one 670 card (thanks flashhawk!). We'll see how that goes.
ID: 39694 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Retvari Zoltan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 09
Posts: 2380
Credit: 16,897,957,044
RAC: 0
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39695 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 8:11:45 UTC

I've received another one of these, and I confirm that the upload size has been doubled, so this problem is fixed by now.
<file_info>
    <name>8x3-GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna-0-1-RND4073_2_8</name>
    <nbytes>0.000000</nbytes>
    <max_nbytes>256000000.000000</max_nbytes>
    <generated_locally/>
    <status>0</status>
    <upload_when_present/>
    <url>http://www.gpugrid.org/PS3GRID_cgi/file_upload_handler</url>
</file_info>
<file_info>
    <name>8x3-GERARD_VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna-0-1-RND4073_2_9</name>
    <nbytes>0.000000</nbytes>
    <max_nbytes>512000000.000000</max_nbytes>
    <generated_locally/>
    <status>0</status>
    <upload_when_present/>
    <url>http://www.gpugrid.org/PS3GRID_cgi/file_upload_handler</url>
</file_info>

However it is not clear for me, why is the size of the _9 file bigger than the size of the _8 file, while the in the reality it's the opposite.
ID: 39695 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Strebsi

Send message
Joined: 10 Jan 13
Posts: 5
Credit: 52,061,897
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39703 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 19:31:52 UTC

I got 2 of the very long wus and computed 60 hours total. After reaching 99 % each wu aborted with an computing error.
---> 0 (Zero) Points for 60 hours computing
Thank you...
ID: 39703 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Dayle Diamond

Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 12
Posts: 84
Credit: 1,663,883,415
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39707 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 21:49:54 UTC - in response to Message 39703.  

I got 2 of the very long wus and computed 60 hours total. After reaching 99 % each wu aborted with an computing error.
---> 0 (Zero) Points for 60 hours computing
Thank you...


That is unfortunate. Please post the error message.
ID: 39707 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Jacob Klein

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 08
Posts: 1127
Credit: 1,901,927,545
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39711 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 22:36:15 UTC - in response to Message 39707.  

I got 2 of the very long wus and computed 60 hours total. After reaching 99 % each wu aborted with an computing error.
---> 0 (Zero) Points for 60 hours computing
Thank you...


That is unfortunate. Please post the error message.


He doesn't have to. You can click on his name, then click View Computers, then see the 2 failed tasks. They failed because of the "upload file size too big" error that was outlined in this thread.

Tough break, it happens. Try not to think of it in terms of "lost credits". Think of it instead in terms of "I tried to help humanity, but it didn't work out. I hope it does next time."

Regards,
Jacob Klein
ID: 39711 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Mumak
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Dec 12
Posts: 92
Credit: 225,897,225
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39716 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 23:13:49 UTC

I have just noticed that my 750 Ti got one of these.
It's at 92% now and total time seems to be 44 hours. Not bad for such a small and low power GPU...
ID: 39716 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Richard Haselgrove

Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 09
Posts: 1639
Credit: 10,159,968,649
RAC: 351
Level
Trp
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39717 - Posted: 25 Jan 2015, 23:36:15 UTC - in response to Message 39716.  

I have just noticed that my 750 Ti got one of these.
It's at 92% now and total time seems to be 44 hours. Not bad for such a small and low power GPU...

Check that it doesn't suffer from the "upload file size too big" problem discussed in this thread (it shouldn't - you got a resend issued well after remedial action was taken).

Otherwise all your hard work won't help with the urgent research project.
ID: 39717 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Mumak
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Dec 12
Posts: 92
Credit: 225,897,225
RAC: 0
Level
Leu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 39719 - Posted: 26 Jan 2015, 7:03:44 UTC - in response to Message 39717.  

I have just noticed that my 750 Ti got one of these.
It's at 92% now and total time seems to be 44 hours. Not bad for such a small and low power GPU...

Check that it doesn't suffer from the "upload file size too big" problem discussed in this thread (it shouldn't - you got a resend issued well after remedial action was taken).

Otherwise all your hard work won't help with the urgent research project.


Yup, I checked. It was a resend, so the max_nbytes was properly adjusted.
ID: 39719 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · Next

Message boards : News : WARNING/CHALLENGE: VERY LONG WU (VERYLONG_CXCL12_confAna)

©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra