Message boards :
Number crunching :
GERARD_CXCL12 : unusual CPU time used
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 25 Jun 14 Posts: 15 Credit: 450,569,525 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Dear all, Merry Christmas and thanks to Gerard for releasing new units to crunch. I looked at my host stats and noticed an unusual CPU time use for GERARD_CXCL12 units when compared to other units ? Source data : http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=177839 I only analyzed page 1, but I found that CPU time / GPU time is : - usually (SDOERR_BARNA5) : 7% (in the range 5%-9%) - for GERARD_CXCL12 : 23% (in the range 21%-24%) System : 2xGTX770+1xG750Ti, Ubuntu 14.04.1 64 bits, BOINC 7.3.15, Nvidia 343.22 (only crunched on GTX770s, not yet on GTX750Ti) Any reason why CPU usage is that high for these particular units ? Best regards, Nicolas |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The CXCL12 WUs contain relatively few small molecules with fewer atoms (about 30k) than typical long-runs (70k - 80k). The less atoms a WU contains, the faster each time step is computed (if everything else, including the scientific model is comparable). For my GTX970 it's about 2 ms per time step, compared to e.g. 5 ms for a SDOERR_BARNA5. The overall runtime of these WUs is comparable to other long runs, which means they must contain more time steps. Some CPU intervention is required after each time step, I think, or at least proportionally to the number of time steps. That's a good reason for the CPU usage of these smaller WUs to be higher :) MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra