New Windows Nvidia driver released: 344.48

Author	Message
biodoc Send message Joined: 26 Aug 08 Posts: 183 Credit: 10,085,929,375 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 38640 - Posted: 23 Oct 2014, 11:00:31 UTC Has anyone tried it yet? Release notes: http://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/344.48/344.48-win8-win7-winvista-desktop-release-notes.pdf ID: 38640 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 38683 - Posted: 25 Oct 2014, 22:23:12 UTC Yep. Nothing unusual to report with a GTX660Ti, compared to my previous 344.11. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 ID: 38683 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Matt Send message Joined: 11 Jan 13 Posts: 216 Credit: 846,538,252 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 38697 - Posted: 26 Oct 2014, 15:26:51 UTC Last modified: 26 Oct 2014, 15:27:40 UTC I've run a few tasks on my 780Ti cards with 344.48. I've not noticed any real change in performance or run-time vs 344.11. ID: 38697 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

eXaPower Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 38698 - Posted: 26 Oct 2014, 15:30:07 UTC One difference-- 344.48 CUDA driver is 6.5.22 compared to 6.5.19 for 343.98/344.11/344.16 ID: 38698 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 38707 - Posted: 26 Oct 2014, 20:56:15 UTC - in response to Message 38698. The changes are likely to only effect GTX 900 series GPU's. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help ID: 38707 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote