Message boards :
News :
GPUGRID statistics graphs
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
Following up on the announcement to discontinue support for old hardware and the oldest application, here are two graphs showing the normalised throughput of GPUGRID broken down by compute capability and application version. http://www.gpugrid.net/graphs/ The legends are messed up for some reason - the first graph is cc, {1.3, 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 3.5, 5.0, 5.2 }, the second app version {42, 60, 65} These will update daily. Matt |
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
For your description of the legends... does it go top-to-bottom in the order you list, or does it go bottom-to-top? |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
bottom to top. 1.3 and 42 are the lowest on their respective graphs |
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you for the prompt response! I like these data graphs :) |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
That blue needs to be gone by the new year! |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The time scale is too short to construe meaning; compute capability distribution vs time should be over two or three months rather than 11 days. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
skgiven- This data collection only started a fortnight ago. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Matt, Gerard, I like those graphs. Is it possible that you place them on the top of the GPUGRID website? Perhaps a new tab "Statistics", or under "Performance". That way it is easy to access and check regularly. Some of us do, you know :) ? Greetings from TJ |
Send message Joined: 26 Mar 14 Posts: 101 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Done! Control+shift+r if you see the menu a bit distorted and you will clean cached stylesheet |
![]() Send message Joined: 6 Jun 11 Posts: 124 Credit: 2,928,865 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nice! Looks really cool. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Done! Control+shift+r if you see the menu a bit distorted and you will clean cached stylesheet Thank you Gerard, now it is very easy to check the stats. Greetings from TJ |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The graphs show 7 generations of compute capability but the key shows 3. Wishful thinking! FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
![]() Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() |
The graphs show 7 generations of compute capability but the key shows 3. from the bottom 1.3, 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 3.5, 5.0, 5.2 The legend is broken and I dont have the effort to fix it. Matt |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Key Compute Capability (CC), GTX series-Scientist, GPU codename, [Maxwell models] CC5.2 GTX900-Maxwell (GM204) [GTX980, GTX970]... CC5.0 GTX700-Maxwell (GM107) [GTX750, GTX750Ti] CC3.5 GTX700-Kepler (GK110) CC3.0 GTX600&700-Kepler (GK104, GK106, GK107, GK208) CC2.1 GTX400&500-Fermi (GF104, GF106, GF108, GF114, GF116, GF118) CC2.0 GTX400&500-Fermi (GF100, GF110) CC1.3 GTX200 (GT200) I've not included non-GTX series cards or laptop GPU's because I'm lazy too. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Now with so many different types of WU, it is difficult in the bar graph to see which bar belongs to which WU. Perhaps it is possible to show the name when hovering over with the mouse? When now hovering over, some data is shown already, so would not be to hard to make? Greetings from TJ |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra