Message boards :
News :
New CPU Application for testing
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My first avx with error: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=13227076 Name 86-MJHARVEY_TEST1001-0-1-RND5489_1 Workunit 10157681 Created 17 Oct 2014 | 11:36:40 UTC Sent 21 Oct 2014 | 15:34:02 UTC Received 21 Oct 2014 | 15:35:57 UTC Server state Over Outcome Computation error Client state Compute error Exit status 255 (0xff) Unknown error number Computer ID 169357 Report deadline 26 Oct 2014 | 15:34:02 UTC Run time 0.41 CPU time 0.00 Validate state Invalid Credit 0.00 Application version Test application for CPU MD v9.01 (mtavx) Stderr output <core_client_version>7.4.22</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The extended attributes are inconsistent. (0xff) - exit code 255 (0xff) </message> ]]> |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Multiple Test application for CPU MD v9.01 (mtavx) failures- all with the same error message: The extended attributes are inconsistent. (0xff) - exit code 255 (0xff) All tasks have 0.00 CPU/run time. |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My machine got work now, a 9.01 mtsse4 task. I will start it soon, and reply with the result. |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Multiple Test application for CPU MD v9.01 (mtavx) failures- all with the same error message: The extended attributes are inconsistent. (0xff) - exit code 255 (0xff) Yes, my fault. The app build is bad. Matt |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
902 |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
9.02 is working--BOINC progress is 0.023 at fifteen minutes. Task has 10000hr estimated runtime throwing the 20mgx GPU task to the side. Estimated runtime is going up as task computes- currently @ 12000hr. If BOINC is correctly reporting task progress-- CPU time till complete-- 10hr for every 1% computed > 1000hr/44days total runtime? 14/10/21 17:06:26 | GPUGRID | [cpu_sched_debug] unfoldx476-NOELIA_UNFOLD-3-72-RND3785_0 sched state 2 next 2 task state 1 14/10/21 17:06:26 | GPUGRID | [cpu_sched_debug] 20mgx396-NOELIA_20MG2-2-50-RND9100_1 sched state 1 next 1 task state 0 14/10/21 17:06:26 | GPUGRID | [cpu_sched_debug] 4083-MJHARVEY_CPUDHFR-0-1-RND9529_1 sched state 2 next 2 task state 1 14/10/21 17:10:45 | GPUGRID | [rr_sim_detail] 0.00: starting 4083-MJHARVEY_CPUDHFR-0-1-RND9529_1 (4.00 CPU) (514480914.05G/12.54G) 14/10/21 17:10:45 | | [rrsim_detail] rpbest: 4083-MJHARVEY_CPUDHFR-0-1-RND9529_1 (finish delay 40205433.52) 14/10/21 17:11:45 | GPUGRID | [rr_sim] 4083-MJHARVEY_CPUDHFR-0-1-RND9529_1 misses deadline by 40416714.74 |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Ok, so the length reporting is still wrong. |
|
Send message Joined: 23 Dec 09 Posts: 189 Credit: 4,798,881,008 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
does it work for pricese puppy 5.7? I do not get any WUs. Thanks. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 497 Credit: 700,690,702 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just tried one of these WUs. My BOINC preference is set to used 50% of the processors, which is four of my eight. The WU grabbed four; Task Manager showed this task using 50%. Thermal Radar normally shows my CPU temp at 41C. Within five minutes the temp had shot up to 65C and the red warning came on. I killed the WU. Anyone else having CPU overheating problems with these WUs? |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
65C is hardly an unreasonable operating temperature for a CPU. Matt |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
does it work for pricese puppy 5.7? I do not get any WUs. Thanks. Who is Princess Puppy? Seriously, tell me the machine ID and I can take a look. |
|
Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I did. i changed "Use at moust 40.00% of CPU time ( 0 means no restriction ). |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just tried one of these WUs. My BOINC preference is set to used 50% of the processors, which is four of my eight. The WU grabbed four; Task Manager showed this task using 50%. Note 1: On my 8-logical-CPU, Intel i7 965 XE, all 4 cores routinely run at 86*C and near-100% CPU usage, 24/7, for 5 years straight, unless I'm gaming. Core Temp shows that TjMax (thermal limiting temperature) is 100*C, and I've never hit that mark. Note 2: MT tasks are allowed to overcommit the CPU, especially in cases where they are running alongside coprocessor (GPU/ASIC) tasks or other high-priority CPU tasks. |
|
Send message Joined: 21 Feb 09 Posts: 497 Credit: 700,690,702 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
65C is hardly an unreasonable operating temperature for a CPU. Thanks for your responses, Matt & Jacob. OK. I downloaded another WU and have been running for 2+ hours, with Core Temp running for most of that. Before the WU started, CPU temp was 40C and CPU fan was 2700rpm. The fan is now at 3500rpm and you can see the CPU temps here: A bit worried about that 75C max... Am I OK to continue, with the Thermal Radar temp well into the red?? |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Who says red is bad? Maybe red is just "hi", and then ultraviolet neon green is "nuclear"? :) Basically, your TjMax is 90. You should feel comfortable going up to 80*C or maybe even 85*C, I'd think, before worrying about heat and stability. |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Jun 10 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,209,302,653 RAC: 32 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is the time estimate for these work units incorrect? I have no slouch of a processor, a 4790K @ stock speeds, and it estimates 66 hours to completion with just shy of four hours of work done. If this is accurate, I will barely be able to complete the two I have downloaded before their turn in time on the 28th assuming I use my computer for a standard 8 hours a day. |
ChileanSend message Joined: 8 Oct 12 Posts: 98 Credit: 385,652,461 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am getting "Download failed" when downloading the CPU app (avx version) on a Windows 7 x64. EDIT: MD5 check fail. EDIT2: Checking the "skip image file verification" under BOINC preferences fixed the error... but I'm pretty sure this is not how things should be done. EDIT3: I re-enabled the image file verification and it managed to download it correctly, yet it only uses 1 core (although BOINC says 8), and the progress report seems to have gotten stuck with: Log file opened on Fri Oct 24 01:12:46 2014 and there's all there is... I'll reset the project once the GPU WU is completed and see what happens then. Also, my other AVX-capable machine only downloads SSE2 WUs, not AVX.
|
|
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 13 Posts: 11 Credit: 7,952,212 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm currently running the mdrun-502-902-avx-64.exe program for Windows 64 bit. The program has been running for about 7 hours and is about to go to 6% complete. However, if I start the task manager it reports the program is only using 27-28% cpu, even though it should be running all 4 cores. Does it take a while for the program to start using all 4 of the cores? Here is the stderr.txt output: BOINC wrapper for GROMACS. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Astiesan wrote: Is the time estimate for these work units incorrect? Yes estimates are incorrect. With AVX 8 threads- the task will take a total ~16hr. Chilean wrote: Also, my other AVX-capable machine only downloads SSE2 WUs, not AVX. Upgrade to BOINC dev 7.4.22 as you did with 3610QM machine. Non-Dev kit are incorrectly reading CPU feature kit for CPUMD tasks. Boinc127 wrote: Does it take a while for the program to start using all 4 of the cores? No- task should use amount threads you've set with BOINC. If you have heavy background processes running concurrent with task this could eat away at cycles. |
|
Send message Joined: 31 Aug 13 Posts: 11 Credit: 7,952,212 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm using the mdrun-502-902-avx-64.exe program and it should be running on 4 cores but its only running on one core. Task manager says its only using 27% cpu, so about 1 core. I also tested multithreading with the only other MT app I can think of, Milkyway N-Body Simulation, and it runs about 80-85% of the total cpu's (all 4 cpus). I've reset and removed and reattached the project, and it still uses only 1 core. There are no other programs taking heavy compute cycles in the background. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra