Message boards :
News :
WU: BI_3
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 5 Jul 12 Posts: 35 Credit: 393,375 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() |
Hi all! Just sent a new project to the long queue, around 2500WUs, ~100,000 credits each. In particular, this project will help us to understand how antidiabetic drugs block its target, but also to develop a better general method for other targets and drugs involved in different diseases. Thanks to all!! |
Send message Joined: 5 May 13 Posts: 187 Credit: 349,254,454 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We'll gladly crunch those for you! :) I hope my 750Ti likes them, it seems to be very selective up to now J ![]() |
Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Awesome! Thanks for posting a little info about the task type - it really does mean a lot to some of us. I look forward to digging into these :) Keep up the good work! |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Apr 09 Posts: 503 Credit: 769,991,668 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Finally, some workunits I can recommend on the diabetes newsgroups. Thank you! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 1 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My slower GTX780Ti has completed one of these in 5 hours 6 minutes and 13 seconds. However its CPU time tells me that the setting of the SWAN_SYNC environmental variable has no effect on this type of workunints, which is pretty bad. Edit: This is a CUDA4.2 task, so it's ok. In this case however, the fact that my hosts received CUDA4.2 tasks is pretty bad. |
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great to see something for diabetes as well. Good luck with your research in this Noelia. Greetings from TJ |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I suggest you update the Science section to reflect this research line, and some others that are not covered by Cancer, HIV, Neurology and Methodology. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Noelia, Don't know what's going on with this WU but it completed 2 days ago and is still listed as pending (Completed, waiting for validation): http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=8190965 Validator problems? |
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 13 Posts: 181 Credit: 144,871,276 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks, Noelia! It is good to see a description of the objectives addressed by research WUs. This helps volunteers understand your research a little better. While it is also good to see the work to we have contributed, results can flow many months after completion of WU crunching. Thanks, again, John Hi all! |
Send message Joined: 25 Feb 14 Posts: 15 Credit: 23,570,837 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As John said, thank you for keeping us posted! |
Send message Joined: 28 Jul 12 Posts: 819 Credit: 1,591,285,971 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They are running about 14 hours on my GTX 750 Ti's. I just upgraded from the 335.28 drivers to the 337.88 drivers (WinXP), and they continue to run fine. The CPU usage is between 4 and 5 percent (E8400). |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Dec 12 Posts: 92 Credit: 225,897,225 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Noelia, I too see a similar situation with this one: http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=8203274 That's quite unusual, maybe an issue ? |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Noelia, That first one was eventually validated, maybe manually? Now you have one that's stuck. I also found 2 more, 1 from my machines and one from skgiven: http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=8203185 http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=8186686 Interestingly, all 3 were reported within a 15 minute time period. Validator problem? I bet there a a lot more out there... |
Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a workunit pending too, but it's not a Noelia. It is I6R105-SDOERR_BARNA5-8-100-RND6676_0 http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=8203643 |
Send message Joined: 18 Oct 13 Posts: 53 Credit: 406,647,419 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
another here Start: 28.05.2014 09:04:53 | GPUGRID | task 15x40-NOELIA_BI_3-4-14-RND3983_0 resumed by user Stop / send 28.05.2014 19:53:19 | GPUGRID | Computation for task 15x40-NOELIA_BI_3-4-14-RND3983_0 finished not listed in my Tasklist but i found this Part in the Tasklist http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=11056419 these WU doesn't exist here on my PC regards |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 Dec 12 Posts: 92 Credit: 225,897,225 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I also noticed that when the WU was completed and uploaded, reporting ended with errors:
I believe this could be somehow related to the issue. |
![]() Send message Joined: 23 Nov 08 Posts: 1112 Credit: 6,162,416,256 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interestingly, all 3 were reported within a 15 minute time period. Validator problem? That 15 minutes I mentioned above was part of the time period when the GPUGrid database was having problems and we couldn't get WUs. Wasn't too long so most probably didn't notice. |
Send message Joined: 23 Nov 10 Posts: 14 Credit: 8,017,535,732 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,731,645,728 RAC: 47,738 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here is an example of strange behavior for a work unit: I came home to find boinc wasn't running, so I restarted it. This unit didn't want to start (it was "Waiting to run", scheduler pending, something like that) . So I suspend this unit, and rebooted the computer. Then I resumed the unit. It was about 11% complete, when it restarted. The next thing that happened, was, it was 100% done and uploading. I didn't do anything to the unit. It finished in a little over an hour, complete and valid. I don't understand this. Name 43x12-NOELIA_BI_3-4-14-RND6565_0 Workunit 8210307 Created 29 May 2014 | 4:43:36 UTC Sent 30 May 2014 | 11:35:19 UTC Received 30 May 2014 | 22:20:17 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 127986 Report deadline 4 Jun 2014 | 11:35:19 UTC Run time 3,970.65 CPU time 3,836.08 Validate state Valid Credit 153,150.00 Application version Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.41 (cuda60) Stderr output <core_client_version>7.2.42</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # GPU [GeForce GTX 690] Platform [Windows] Rev [3301M] VERSION [60] # SWAN Device 1 : # Name : GeForce GTX 690 # ECC : Disabled # Global mem : 2048MB # Capability : 3.0 # PCI ID : 0000:04:00.0 # Device clock : 1019MHz # Memory clock : 3004MHz # Memory width : 256bit # Driver version : r334_89 : 33523 # GPU 0 : 59C # GPU 1 : 68C # GPU 2 : 69C # GPU 3 : 68C # GPU 0 : 61C # GPU 0 : 62C # GPU 0 : 63C # GPU 3 : 69C # GPU 0 : 64C # GPU 0 : 65C 17:19:15 (11720): Can't acquire lockfile (32) - waiting 35s 17:19:50 (11720): Can't acquire lockfile (32) - exiting 17:19:50 (11720): Error: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process. (0x20) 17:30:41 (9996): Can't acquire lockfile (32) - waiting 35s 17:31:16 (9996): Can't acquire lockfile (32) - exiting 17:31:16 (9996): Error: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process. (0x20) # GPU 0 : 66C # GPU 2 : 70C # GPU 0 : 67C # GPU 3 : 70C # GPU 2 : 71C # Time per step (avg over 3750000 steps): 8.885 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 33318.571 s 17:48:22 (6192): called boinc_finish # GPU [GeForce GTX 690] Platform [Windows] Rev [3301M] VERSION [60] # SWAN Device 2 : # Name : GeForce GTX 690 # ECC : Disabled # Global mem : 2048MB # Capability : 3.0 # PCI ID : 0000:07:00.0 # Device clock : 1019MHz # Memory clock : 3004MHz # Memory width : 256bit # Driver version : r334_89 : 33523 # GPU 0 : 65C # GPU 1 : 59C # GPU 2 : 69C # GPU 3 : 68C # Time per step (avg over 2 steps): 35.000 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 131250.322 s 18:02:17 (1700): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=11062981 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra