Application 6.45 for Windows

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Application 6.45 for Windows
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 2311 - Posted: 13 Sep 2008, 23:24:41 UTC

Same as 6.44 for Linux but it reports also the approximate total elapsed time.

gdf
ID: 2311 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile UBT - NaRyan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 08
Posts: 68
Credit: 1,242,980
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 2314 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 6:36:10 UTC - in response to Message 2311.  

Same as 6.44 for Linux but it reports also the approximate total elapsed time.

gdf


Nice improvements! :)
1% cpu usage (when it uses the cpu), and the workunit is 50% done, shows 8 seconds of CPU time, normally that would have been about 7 hours 20 minutes.

Down with the Kredit Kops!!!
ID: 2314 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[AF>Le_Pommier] McRoger

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 12
Credit: 15,800,629
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2315 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 8:21:13 UTC

Is it still in beta testing or in production (and I guess a project reset is necessary) ?

And to get that small CPU usage, are you using a pre-release of Boinc 6.3.11 or 6.3.10 ?

Thx !
ID: 2315 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1958
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 2316 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 9:18:45 UTC - in response to Message 2315.  

Is it still in beta testing or in production (and I guess a project reset is necessary) ?

And to get that small CPU usage, are you using a pre-release of Boinc 6.3.11 or 6.3.10 ?

Thx !


We are still in beta testing. You should not need a project reset if you were running the previous application.

A project reset is necessary for people that have download errors.

gdf
ID: 2316 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[AF>Le_Pommier] McRoger

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 08
Posts: 12
Credit: 15,800,629
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2320 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 10:19:07 UTC

Thanks, just downloaded a wu to be crunched with 6.45.
ID: 2320 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 2321 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 10:27:24 UTC

I tested 6.45, the display is a lot slowed down :( . It is almost unusable on vista64 + 9600GT
ID: 2321 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2324 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 11:32:13 UTC

App started fine and is almost not using the CPU. If there is a reduced responsivity of the system it is very small, i.e. I didn't notice a change. Running XP32 SP2, 9800GTX+, 6.3.10 and 177.92.

GDF, may I ask how you implemented this great new feature?

MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
ID: 2324 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 07
Posts: 512
Credit: 111,288,061
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2325 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 12:48:32 UTC

I'm on my first 6.45 windows task.

CPU usage in task manager shows 02 to 06, instead of 50 (for 1 HT CPU)

After 30 minutes of run time, BOINC CPU usage shows 1m 34s.

This means too my CPU runs cooler, Wattage usage drops 34W, from 1 BOINC CPU task to 1 GPU task with a little CPU. Every little bit helps.

This is a very nice improvement :)

---

One thing to note, when the first 6.45 started, Windows XP SP3 popped up a security window, I had to unblock the application. I never had to do that before with any apps. SP3 was recently installed and this is the first app version change since then, so it may have changed some setting. Just to let those know who may run this on some unattended machine, they need to watch for this.
ID: 2325 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 07
Posts: 512
Credit: 111,288,061
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2327 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 13:05:04 UTC - in response to Message 2315.  

Is it still in beta testing or in production (and I guess a project reset is necessary) ?

And to get that small CPU usage, are you using a pre-release of Boinc 6.3.11 or 6.3.10 ?

Thx !

See the front page Join with your Nvidia graphics card (beta).

Links to the client in that section indicate what client should be used (if you hover over the link, you see the download URL, the version number is part of the URL.
ID: 2327 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Rabinovitch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 08
Posts: 143
Credit: 64,937,578
RAC: 0
Level
Thr
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2329 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 15:54:07 UTC

Ok, a new app is running well and almost not occupies CPU resources. So when we will be able to run 3 distributed computing projects WUs - 1 on GPU and 2 on double core CPU?
ID: 2329 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile UBT - NaRyan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 08
Posts: 68
Credit: 1,242,980
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 2330 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 15:57:13 UTC - in response to Message 2327.  

My 1st v6.45 workunit finished ok.

Shows a total cpu time of 16.78 Seconds, and the task ID says approx 53211 seconds


Down with the Kredit Kops!!!
ID: 2330 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile MJH

Send message
Joined: 12 Nov 07
Posts: 696
Credit: 27,266,655
RAC: 0
Level
Val
Scientific publications
watwat
Message 2331 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 16:01:09 UTC - in response to Message 2325.  



One thing to note, when the first 6.45 started, Windows XP SP3 popped up a security window, I had to unblock the application.


Keith, do you recall what the warning said?

Matt
ID: 2331 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2332 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 16:24:05 UTC - in response to Message 2331.  

Keith, do you recall what the warning said?


Probably this standard execution prevention dialog, telling you that MS doesn't know where this .exe comes from and asks you if you really want to execute it.

@Rabinovitch: when BOINC 6.3.11 is released. Currently there's no definite ETA, but it shouldn't be too long (as long as you're not too impatient ;)

MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
ID: 2332 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2333 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 16:26:15 UTC

Oh, and looking at NaRyans result currently there seem to be 850000 steps in each WU?

MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
ID: 2333 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 2334 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 16:34:33 UTC - in response to Message 2332.  
Last modified: 14 Sep 2008, 16:35:26 UTC


Probably this standard execution prevention dialog, telling you that MS doesn't know where this .exe comes from and asks you if you really want to execute it.

MrS


Not really, on vista64 I had the same thing and it was to communicate with the internet
ID: 2334 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 07
Posts: 512
Credit: 111,288,061
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2335 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 17:17:36 UTC - in response to Message 2331.  



One thing to note, when the first 6.45 started, Windows XP SP3 popped up a security window, I had to unblock the application.


Keith, do you recall what the warning said?

Matt

Sorry no, who read those things anymore. I was just the standard windows firewall security block. I selected the unblock button since I trust you guys.

I see now that acemd_6.45... is on the exceptions list. Like I said it never did this before. Something windows changed. Matter of fact its the only application type on the list. I do have boinc and client in there. Unless before the firewall had been turned off and the update turned it back on ?
ID: 2335 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 07
Posts: 512
Credit: 111,288,061
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2336 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 17:22:42 UTC - in response to Message 2329.  

Ok, a new app is running well and almost not occupies CPU resources. So when we will be able to run 3 distributed computing projects WUs - 1 on GPU and 2 on double core CPU?

When the developer at Berkeley who does the builds gets off vacation. This will be 6.3.11. Until he returns and decides when it is time to do another release, we just have to wait. I do not know when he will be back. Another week or two maybe, maybe more, maybe less.
ID: 2336 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 07
Posts: 512
Credit: 111,288,061
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2337 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 18:46:16 UTC - in response to Message 2330.  
Last modified: 14 Sep 2008, 18:49:37 UTC

My 1st v6.45 workunit finished ok.

Shows a total cpu time of 16.78 Seconds, and the task ID says approx 53211 seconds

Is this time correct, 16 seconds ?

My first 6.45 has been running, now 38% done and has taken 24 minutes and 42 seconds of CPU time (1482 seconds). A check in task manager show same number of minutes and seconds. This would make the total be approx 3900 seconds when done.

His final time will be about 2000 seconds faster than what mine usually run of 55,000 seconds. Not that much different on the GPU times.

Why the big difference on CPU times ? ? ?
ID: 2337 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ExtraTerrestrial Apes
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 08
Posts: 2705
Credit: 1,311,122,549
RAC: 0
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 2339 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 20:08:15 UTC

I'm at 4:37 min CPU usage after 58.5% on a Q6600 @ 3 GHz. I noticed that initially (the first 1 - 1.5 h) the cpu usage was very low, at the order of few seconds, but when I started to use the machine it seemed to go up.

MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
ID: 2339 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile UBT - NaRyan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 08
Posts: 68
Credit: 1,242,980
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 2340 - Posted: 14 Sep 2008, 20:49:27 UTC - in response to Message 2339.  

With the difference in CPU times, are you using an Intel CPU?
I noticed on my Q6600 that cpu time is higher compared to my AMD Dual core.

AMD = 16 Seconds
Intel = 47 Minutes 32 Seconds

And the 2nd workunit on the AMD is heading the same way.
The 2nd workunit on the Intel is at 3% yet it shows the same cpu time (4 seconds) as the AMD system that is at 42%.

Perhaps the new app works better on AMD?

Down with the Kredit Kops!!!
ID: 2340 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Application 6.45 for Windows

©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra