Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
Application 6.45 for Windows
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Same as 6.44 for Linux but it reports also the approximate total elapsed time. gdf |
UBT - NaRyanSend message Joined: 16 Jul 08 Posts: 68 Credit: 1,242,980 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Same as 6.44 for Linux but it reports also the approximate total elapsed time. Nice improvements! :) 1% cpu usage (when it uses the cpu), and the workunit is 50% done, shows 8 seconds of CPU time, normally that would have been about 7 hours 20 minutes. Down with the Kredit Kops!!! |
|
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 15,800,629 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is it still in beta testing or in production (and I guess a project reset is necessary) ? And to get that small CPU usage, are you using a pre-release of Boinc 6.3.11 or 6.3.10 ? Thx ! |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is it still in beta testing or in production (and I guess a project reset is necessary) ? We are still in beta testing. You should not need a project reset if you were running the previous application. A project reset is necessary for people that have download errors. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 30 Aug 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 15,800,629 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks, just downloaded a wu to be crunched with 6.45. |
[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZSend message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
I tested 6.45, the display is a lot slowed down :( . It is almost unusable on vista64 + 9600GT |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
App started fine and is almost not using the CPU. If there is a reduced responsivity of the system it is very small, i.e. I didn't notice a change. Running XP32 SP2, 9800GTX+, 6.3.10 and 177.92. GDF, may I ask how you implemented this great new feature? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm on my first 6.45 windows task. CPU usage in task manager shows 02 to 06, instead of 50 (for 1 HT CPU) After 30 minutes of run time, BOINC CPU usage shows 1m 34s. This means too my CPU runs cooler, Wattage usage drops 34W, from 1 BOINC CPU task to 1 GPU task with a little CPU. Every little bit helps. This is a very nice improvement :) --- One thing to note, when the first 6.45 started, Windows XP SP3 popped up a security window, I had to unblock the application. I never had to do that before with any apps. SP3 was recently installed and this is the first app version change since then, so it may have changed some setting. Just to let those know who may run this on some unattended machine, they need to watch for this. |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is it still in beta testing or in production (and I guess a project reset is necessary) ? See the front page Join with your Nvidia graphics card (beta). Links to the client in that section indicate what client should be used (if you hover over the link, you see the download URL, the version number is part of the URL. |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 08 Posts: 143 Credit: 64,937,578 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ok, a new app is running well and almost not occupies CPU resources. So when we will be able to run 3 distributed computing projects WUs - 1 on GPU and 2 on double core CPU? |
UBT - NaRyanSend message Joined: 16 Jul 08 Posts: 68 Credit: 1,242,980 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My 1st v6.45 workunit finished ok. Shows a total cpu time of 16.78 Seconds, and the task ID says approx 53211 seconds Down with the Kredit Kops!!! |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Keith, do you recall what the warning said? Matt |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Keith, do you recall what the warning said? Probably this standard execution prevention dialog, telling you that MS doesn't know where this .exe comes from and asks you if you really want to execute it. @Rabinovitch: when BOINC 6.3.11 is released. Currently there's no definite ETA, but it shouldn't be too long (as long as you're not too impatient ;) MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh, and looking at NaRyans result currently there seem to be 850000 steps in each WU? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
[XTBA>XTC] ZeuZSend message Joined: 15 Jul 08 Posts: 60 Credit: 108,384 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Not really, on vista64 I had the same thing and it was to communicate with the internet |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sorry no, who read those things anymore. I was just the standard windows firewall security block. I selected the unblock button since I trust you guys. I see now that acemd_6.45... is on the exceptions list. Like I said it never did this before. Something windows changed. Matter of fact its the only application type on the list. I do have boinc and client in there. Unless before the firewall had been turned off and the update turned it back on ? |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ok, a new app is running well and almost not occupies CPU resources. So when we will be able to run 3 distributed computing projects WUs - 1 on GPU and 2 on double core CPU? When the developer at Berkeley who does the builds gets off vacation. This will be 6.3.11. Until he returns and decides when it is time to do another release, we just have to wait. I do not know when he will be back. Another week or two maybe, maybe more, maybe less. |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My 1st v6.45 workunit finished ok. Is this time correct, 16 seconds ? My first 6.45 has been running, now 38% done and has taken 24 minutes and 42 seconds of CPU time (1482 seconds). A check in task manager show same number of minutes and seconds. This would make the total be approx 3900 seconds when done. His final time will be about 2000 seconds faster than what mine usually run of 55,000 seconds. Not that much different on the GPU times. Why the big difference on CPU times ? ? ? |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm at 4:37 min CPU usage after 58.5% on a Q6600 @ 3 GHz. I noticed that initially (the first 1 - 1.5 h) the cpu usage was very low, at the order of few seconds, but when I started to use the machine it seemed to go up. MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
UBT - NaRyanSend message Joined: 16 Jul 08 Posts: 68 Credit: 1,242,980 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
With the difference in CPU times, are you using an Intel CPU? I noticed on my Q6600 that cpu time is higher compared to my AMD Dual core. AMD = 16 Seconds Intel = 47 Minutes 32 Seconds And the 2nd workunit on the AMD is heading the same way. The 2nd workunit on the Intel is at 3% yet it shows the same cpu time (4 seconds) as the AMD system that is at 42%. Perhaps the new app works better on AMD? Down with the Kredit Kops!!! |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra