Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU only app v1.05
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,731,645,728 RAC: 57 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I received a few of these units. So far, everything is finishing, completed and validated. The progress column updates regularly, until it reaches about 50%, than, in flash, the unit finishes, uploads and reports. http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=127986&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=25 7928940 127986 14 Mar 2014 | 21:33:54 UTC 14 Mar 2014 | 22:09:38 UTC Completed and validated 598.33 572.70 3.09 CPU only app v1.05 |
|
Send message Joined: 24 Mar 14 Posts: 4 Credit: 506,809 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Getting nothing but errors upon starting of v1.05 tasks on BOTH Windows & Android. Tasks are erroring out for ALL who have attempted to run them. One example of error message that is common to BOTH types: Stderr output
|
rittermSend message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 88 Credit: 244,413,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Getting nothing but errors upon starting of v1.05 tasks... Me, too. As are all of my wingmen, as best I can tell... :-( |
victor_suecaSend message Joined: 1 Nov 13 Posts: 1 Credit: 318,031 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications
|
Here the same, 5 seconds executing an then... "Misscalculation"
|
|
Send message Joined: 23 May 09 Posts: 121 Credit: 400,300,664 RAC: 16 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
+1 Alexander |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Yeah, well I buggered up that set of WUs. I guess that poisoned the reliability stats of all participating clients. I think we just have to wait for the server to let you all out of Nid. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IIRC the lockout period is 24h, so most systems should be getting out of jail today. I believe there is a way to reset this manually, but it's probably not handy and 24h isn't too long. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
rittermSend message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 88 Credit: 244,413,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But, is it safe to go back in the water? Sorry if I missed something... |
rittermSend message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 88 Credit: 244,413,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But, is it safe to go back in the water? Safer, at least, it would seem. I'm 5-10 minutes into new WU's and no problems, so far. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Must be a not-so-bad batch released. Looks like the MJHARVEY_TINYBOXDEC1 WU's were bad. You might have server aborted them; I was still picking _7 WU's up this evening :( The MJHARVEY_DUDMYREC15 WU's seem to be working. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
At my systems the DECOY414-MJHARVEY_DUDMYRECxx where erroring, but with wingman too. Greetings from TJ |
rittermSend message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 88 Credit: 244,413,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
skgiven wrote: Looks like the MJHARVEY_TINYBOXDEC1 WU's were bad...The MJHARVEY_DUDMYREC15 WU's seem to be working. For me, it's just the opposite: The MJHARVEY_TINYBOXDEC1 WU's are fine; it's the MJHARVEY_DUDMYREC15 WU's that are causing me problems. |
(retired account)Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
DECOY....-MJHARVEY_DUDMYREC15-0-1-RND...._. is still nothing but failing on Windows 64bit, apparently due to an error in the input files: Parse error on line 1 in file "protein.pdbqt": ATOM syntax incorrect: "9.00 -17.40" is not a valid AutoDock type. Note that AutoDock atom types are case-sensitive. Yeah, well I buggered up that set of WUs. Honestly, I do not understand why you aren't canceling this batch if you can't fix it? Regards |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
In fact, I thought they had been cancelled. Will check. Matt |
(retired account)Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I see, thanks for checking. No offense intended. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra