Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU only app v1.04
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 490 Credit: 11,731,645,728 RAC: 57 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I successfully completed one of these units. http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=5228104 3 Mar 2014 | 22:14:10 UTC 3 Mar 2014 | 23:07:04 UTC Completed and validated 1,477.65 1,359.77 9.02 CPU only app v1.04 Two others are still running on my other machine. Why are we bothering with CPU work units? They are so much slower than GPU WU. |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Why are we bothering with CPU work units? They are so much slower than GPU WU. These are pathfinder WUs for a new project that we are currently scoping. Please keep crunching them, it's giving us useful information. More details on the project soon! Matt |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Nov 12 Posts: 10 Credit: 185,958,753 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
v1.07 finally completed on my android without failing. Woohoo. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Feb 13 Posts: 181 Credit: 144,871,276 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Folding@home at Stanford just rolled out a really nifty Chrome app which just chugs along using CPU power. So easy to use! v1.07 finally completed on my android without failing. Woohoo. |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Trailblazing again .........☺ A few basic observations (Linux): Task progress remains at 0% and then jumps to 100%. After tasks reach 100% they proceed to about 10000000000% After a task reaches 100% if it's suspended it resumes from 0%. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 9 May 13 Posts: 171 Credit: 4,594,296,466 RAC: 140 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just started a CPU only app 1.04 on a Windows 7 box with BOINC 7.2.37. After the job ran for about a minute, the progress column now says "1.#IO%" and the Remaining column says " ---" (instead of showing hh:mm:ss). Also running a CPU only app 1.01 on a Linux Ubuntu 13.10 box. After 6 minutes, it shows that progress is 18302.850%. Remaining says " ---". Job completed after ~10 minutes and shows that it is "Completed and Validated". Let me know if you need more info. captainjack |
rittermSend message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 88 Credit: 244,413,897 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm not sure what the expected run times are, but the tasks I've completed have run between about 5000-6500 seconds. Observations for my hosts (Win7-64, 3 Intel, 1 AMD): 1) Many tasks still running long after progress has reached 100%. WU properties show nonsensical values for the fraction done. 2) When suspended then resumed, those tasks finished shortly after starting to run again* 3) I've seen progress values in a wide range between 0%-100%. Often, WU properties fraction done does not match progress value. *[edit]Except when they don't finish shortly after restarting.[/edit] |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In addition to observing the same behaviors others have already posted ... I just attached a Win7 x64 client that does not have an NVidia card and while the server status says there are no CPU tasks available the event log message doesn't match ... says no "long" tasks available? 3/4/2014 10:04:45 PM | GPUGRID | update requested by user 3/4/2014 10:04:48 PM | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 3/4/2014 10:04:48 PM | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for CPU 3/4/2014 10:04:50 PM | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 3/4/2014 10:04:50 PM | GPUGRID | No tasks sent 3/4/2014 10:04:50 PM | GPUGRID | No tasks are available for Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) Thanks - Steve |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Jul 12 Posts: 98 Credit: 386,043,752 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Look in your preferences. You have it set somewhere to only do Long runs and not do the cpu tasks. |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the help guys. Probably the progress info is not working. How many CPU jobs do you get per CPU core? gdf |
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's 'common' to see WU's reach 100% and run for a bit before completing. You just need to make sure the % stops at 100, and allow the estimated run times to be more accurate - didn't look but presumably the GFlops value needs to be set more accurately. On an 8 core CPU, I expect you could get up to 8 CPU tasks. At times I was running Five CPU only 1.01 apps (as I was attached to other CPU projects, and running 2 GPU tasks). So one task per logical core/thread (on an i7 with 8 logical threads). FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help |
|
Send message Joined: 4 Apr 09 Posts: 450 Credit: 539,316,349 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks for the help guys. I didn't test this specifically and while I never got more than 1 per "core" that was likely only because it was the amount of work BOINC thought I needed to meet my cache settings. If you release some more and I can test when I get home from work tonight - about 12 hours from now. Thanks - Steve |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Yeah, I broke the progress reporting somehow. It's just a cosmetic problem, though admittedly an annoying one. Matt |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Sep 08 Posts: 18 Credit: 1,551,929,462 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks for the help guys. 24 WU for 24 CPU core for me
|
skgivenSend message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Send message Joined: 23 May 09 Posts: 121 Credit: 400,300,664 RAC: 16 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have added two devices to gpugrid two days ago; have not got a single wu ... |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
we need to do still a couple of changes to the application for the science and for stability. In particular one that packs for work for WU. gdf |
|
Send message Joined: 20 Nov 13 Posts: 21 Credit: 480,846,415 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is this a test for Android (I hope)? If so will it be in the list of available projects in the BOINC app? |
|
Send message Joined: 16 Jul 12 Posts: 98 Credit: 386,043,752 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You can already run them on an Android device. |
|
Send message Joined: 20 Nov 13 Posts: 21 Credit: 480,846,415 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I see GPUgrid in the list of projects now in the BOINC app, but it says 'device not supported' and doesn't seem to be downloading work once I add the project. I have a Galaxy S4 phone. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra