Message boards :
Graphics cards (GPUs) :
Maxwell now
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 14 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There were two more CUDA6.5 workunits on my GTX780Ti, both of them failed the same way: # Simulation unstable. Flag 11 value 1 # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (2) I16R23-SDOERR_BARNA5-32-100-RND7031_0 I12R83-SDOERR_BARNA5-32-100-RND2687_0 Now this host received a CUDA6.0 task, so I don't want to try again, but I think that the CUDA6.5 app has a bug. |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Aug 08 Posts: 183 Credit: 10,085,929,375 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I ordered a GTX980 from Newegg. Zotac and gigabyte were my only options so I went with gigabyte. All other manufacturers cards were "out of stock". Yes, my preference would have been EVGA or PNY (lifetime warranty but fixed core voltage). This will be my first Gigabyte card so I hope it works out. The F@H numbers sold me. I think Nvidia GPU performance on F@H generally translates to GPUGrid. Besides, I usually spend the month of December folding, so the GTX980 will be a nice companion to my 780Ti. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have more failed CUDA6.5 tasks on my GTX680: 19x56-NOELIA_5bisrun2-2-4-RND7637_2 I14R24-SDOERR_BARNA5-25-100-RND2569_0 20mgx12-NOELIA_20MG2-9-50-RND2493_0 I12R11-SDOERR_BARNA5-24-100-RND0763_0 I2R35-SDOERR_BARNA5-31-100-RND8916_0 # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) Actually all CUDA6.5 tasks are failing on my GTX680 (OC) and GTX780Ti (Non-OC) |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I haven't found any successfully finished CUDA6.5 tasks (obviously these are too fresh). But there are five which failed on other's hosts the same way they failed on mine: 19x56-NOELIA_5bisrun2-2-4-RND7637_1 (GTX780Ti OC) I7R106-SDOERR_BARNA5-32-100-RND7602_1 (GTX TITAN non-OC) 19x64-NOELIA_5bisrun2-3-4-RND8765_0 (GTX TITAN non-OC) # Simulation unstable. Flag 11 value 1 # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (2) I2R31-SDOERR_BARNA5-30-100-RND8191_0 (GTX770 OC) I11R57-SDOERR_BARNA5-32-100-RND3266_0 (GTX770 non-OC) # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) |
|
Send message Joined: 11 Jan 13 Posts: 216 Credit: 846,538,252 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I just had one of these errors on a 780Ti as well. 20mgx76-NOELIA_20MG2-6-50-RND7695_0 Edit: Now three Cuda65 in a row have failed. 20mgx76-NOELIA_20MG2-6-50-RND7695_0 I8R16-SDOERR_BARNA5-29-100-RND7841_2 |
|
Send message Joined: 7 Jun 12 Posts: 112 Credit: 1,140,895,172 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I7R110-SDOERR_BARNA5-32-100-RND5097_1 10082727 181608 22 Sep 2014 | 17:59:10 UTC 23 Sep 2014 | 0:04:53 UTC Error while computing 6.07 2.70 --- Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.41 (cuda65) I11R16-SDOERR_BARNA5-29-100-RND4924_1 10097574 179755 22 Sep 2014 | 16:41:21 UTC 23 Sep 2014 | 0:45:03 UTC Error while computing 10.75 3.53 --- Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.41 (cuda65) I12R49-SDOERR_BARNA5-30-100-RND2140_0 10097949 181608 22 Sep 2014 | 17:59:10 UTC 23 Sep 2014 | 0:04:53 UTC Error while computing 13.20 2.86 19x48-NOELIA_5bisrun2-3-4-RND9893_0 10097397 176407 22 Sep 2014 | 11:03:22 UTC 22 Sep 2014 | 11:08:37 UTC Error while computing 2.05 0.13 I6R67-SDOERR_BARNA5-31-100-RND9535_1 10089657 176407 22 Sep 2014 | 6:36:59 UTC 22 Sep 2014 | 11:08:37 UTC Error while computing 171.94 27.72 --- Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.41 (cuda60) 43x63-NOELIA_5bisrun2-3-4-RND0357_0 10096302 176407 22 Sep 2014 | 1:39:43 UTC 22 Sep 2014 | 11:03:22 UTC Error while computing 14,762.32 3,420.89 |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Jozef, there's a CUDA 6.0 task among these. Maybe you need to reboot the host after those CUDA 6.5 failures? Or is it running normally again? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
CUDA 65s should only have been going to the new Maxwells, sorry about that. You shouldn't see any new ones going to older cards - please should if you do, it'll be a scheduler bug. Matt |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Jul 14 Posts: 5 Credit: 5,618,275 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
I had two CUDA65 tasks, but same "FATAL: cannot find image for module [.nonbonded.cu.] for device version 520" error. I3R87-SDOERR_BARNA5-32-100-RND2755_1 I16R41-SDOERR_BARNA5-29-100-RND8564_0 Two CUDA60 task had "ERROR: file mdioload.cpp line 81: Unable to read bincoordfile". I957-SANTI_p53final-15-21-RND0451_5 I864-SANTI_p53final-17-21-RND8261_5 And I'm running only 1 WU at a time except setiathome_v7 tasks. |
MJHSend message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Right. The new 65 app is failing for non-obvious reasons, so I've moved it to the acemdbeta queue. If you have a GTX9x0, please get some work from that queue. |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Jul 14 Posts: 5 Credit: 5,618,275 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
I have GTX970 and checked at "Run test applications?" and "ACEMD beta", but BOINC says "No tasks are available for ACEMD beta version". Is there something I need to do in order to get beta tasks? |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have GTX970 and checked at "Run test applications?" and "ACEMD beta", but BOINC says "No tasks are available for ACEMD beta version". On the GPUGRID preference page, about in the middle is a option called: Run test applications? You have to set it to yes as well. But perhaps you did then sorry about this post. Greetings from TJ |
|
Send message Joined: 3 Jul 14 Posts: 5 Credit: 5,618,275 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]()
|
Use NVIDIA GPU : yes Run test applications? yes ACEMD beta: yes Use Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) if available : yes No beta tasks downloaded yet. |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Should I open that ESD bag? :) |
|
Send message Joined: 25 Sep 13 Posts: 293 Credit: 1,897,601,978 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
These are two GK104/GK110 time from you're hosts to compared with new GM204. 20mgx58-NOELIA_20MG2-6-50-RND1410_0 Time per step (avg over 5000000 steps): 5.600 ms Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 27997.766 s Device clock : 1201MHz Memory clock : 3004MHz Memory width : 256bit Driver version : r343_98 : 34411 GeForce GTX 680 Capability 3.0 20mgx81-NOELIA_20MG2-1-50-RND0462_1 Ti time per step (avg over 5000000 steps): 3.306 ms Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 16531.969 s Device clock : 928MHz Memory clock : 3500MHz Driver version : r340_00 : 34043 GeForce GTX 780 Ti Capability 3.5 |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The good news is that I've successfully installed the GTX980 under Windows XP x64. The bad news is that I could not get beta work for it. 23/09/2014 19:38:23 | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA 23/09/2014 19:38:25 | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 23/09/2014 19:38:25 | GPUGRID | No tasks sent 23/09/2014 19:38:25 | GPUGRID | No tasks are available for ACEMD beta version 23/09/2014 19:38:25 | GPUGRID | No tasks are available for the applications you have selected. 23/09/2014 19:41:53 | GPUGRID | update requested by user 23/09/2014 19:41:55 | GPUGRID | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 23/09/2014 19:41:55 | GPUGRID | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA 23/09/2014 19:41:57 | GPUGRID | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks Before you ask: I did all the necessary settings. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seems like Matt has to fill the beta queue, or already got enough failed results from the batch he submitted :p MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
Retvari ZoltanSend message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2380 Credit: 16,897,957,044 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Seems like Matt has to fill the beta queue, or already got enough failed results from the batch he submitted :p According to the server status page, there are 100 unsent beta workunits, and the application page shows that there is only the v8.42 CUDA6.5 beta app. Somehow these didn't bound together. I think this could be another scheduler issue. |
|
Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nice card you have there Zoltan. Would love to see the results as soon as Matt has got it working. I hope you will have good luck with this card right from the start. Greetings from TJ |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nice card you have there Zoltan. Would love to see the results as soon as Matt has got it working. I second that! BTW: what are you currently running on the card? Any results from other projects to share? :) MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra