No 780 TI luck!

Author	Message
Oktan Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 16 Credit: 953,280,454 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33846 - Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 21:29:01 UTC No luck with 780 ti, no usable gpus found have all the new drivers but im on vista 64 thoght any tips?? Mvh/ Oktan ID: 33846 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33848 - Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 21:36:37 UTC - in response to Message 33846. Did you install BOINC in safe mode, or are you accessing the machine via remote desktop? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 ID: 33848 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Oktan Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 16 Credit: 953,280,454 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33849 - Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 21:41:01 UTC - in response to Message 33848. No safe mode or remote desktop. ID: 33849 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33851 - Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 21:54:45 UTC Does regular 3D work, games or benchmarks? MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 ID: 33851 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Oktan Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 16 Credit: 953,280,454 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33854 - Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 22:03:48 UTC - in response to Message 33851. Dont use games or benchmarks but i tryed som 3d screensavers that worked great. ID: 33854 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Oktan Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 16 Credit: 953,280,454 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33856 - Posted: 12 Nov 2013, 22:09:15 UTC - in response to Message 33854. Hope it not the linux delay thingy but in windows, is 780 ti to fast for boinc and if so how to make a delay in windows start up? ID: 33856 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33857 - Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 0:45:40 UTC My 780ti works fine in W7. Did you try the install disk that comes with the card? ID: 33857 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Oktan Send message Joined: 28 Mar 09 Posts: 16 Credit: 953,280,454 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33860 - Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 8:14:31 UTC - in response to Message 33857. Thanks for the help ExtraTerrestrial Apes and Petebe for your help. Worked fine when i tryed Petebes suggestion to run install disk that comes with the card,strange that older drivers work but not the newest. Mvh/ Oktan ID: 33860 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

TJ Send message Joined: 26 Jun 09 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,470,385,294 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33866 - Posted: 13 Nov 2013, 16:36:21 UTC Last modified: 13 Nov 2013, 16:36:47 UTC Wow the 780Ti is roughly 10000 seconds faster then my 770 on LR's. Greetings from TJ ID: 33866 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33887 - Posted: 14 Nov 2013, 21:19:25 UTC Wow, that's about twice as fast as my GTX660Ti.. although mine runs throttled to 108 W actual power consumption and mostly runs 2 POEM tasks along GPU-Grid for ~97% GPU utilization. Anyway, a pretty powerful card! Much better value than Titan, yet still on the expensive side (as can be expected for the fastest single GPU card). MrS Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 ID: 33887 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33898 - Posted: 15 Nov 2013, 19:41:43 UTC - in response to Message 33887. Oktan's 780Ti is 39% faster than my GTX770 (W7), but unknowns can make a big difference. OT. I think my G2020 is struggling to feed my GTX770 on Linux; it's only 2% faster than my slightly OC'd W7 770. FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help ID: 33898 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Jeroen Send message Joined: 26 Nov 10 Posts: 9 Credit: 13,246,151 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33902 - Posted: 16 Nov 2013, 1:06:37 UTC I just ran one long-run task via a GTX 780 Ti. Run time was 17,435 seconds. I plan to try the new card with this project in Linux next. ID: 33902 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications	Message 33910 - Posted: 16 Nov 2013, 15:28:05 UTC - in response to Message 33902. Last modified: 17 Nov 2013, 11:37:06 UTC Thanks for the input Jeroen, I573-SANTI_baxbim2-23-32-RND4824_1 4926480 15 Nov 2013 \| 19:36:15 UTC 16 Nov 2013 \| 0:53:15 UTC Completed and validated 17,435.08 17,346.09 163,950.00 Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v8.14 (cuda55) I see you are using XP. This should be around 11% faster than W7. I don't think you will see much difference on Linux... On a GTX770, my last SANTI_baxbim2 Run time was 31,227.79. So your card is 79% faster (but I'm using W7). Your card is also 30% faster than Oktan's. 11% of that would be due to Oktan's operating system. The other could be due to overuse of the CPU, having a slower CPU, the card not boosting as high... FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help ID: 33910 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote