So now that we seem to have some pretty stable WUs working on the GK110s, I'm curious as to how they're performing against other cards. For those of you that have ran them, let's do some comparisons.

Post the following:

OS
Driver
GPU
Clock
Completion time

So, for me:

W7
326.80
780
1100MHz
4200s

WinXPx64
326.80
GTX680
1201MHz
5915sec

WinXPx64
326.80
GTX670
980MHz (I think it's 1089MHz)
6700sec

That's a larger difference than I was expecting.

Thx for posting.

W7x64
326.41
GTX660
1058MHz
9,677.37

I4R18-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-0-50-RND9988_0 4715247 24 Aug 2013 | 12:51:21 UTC 24 Aug 2013 | 18:19:46 UTC Completed and validated 9,677.37 9,610.10 60,900.00 ACEMD beta version v8.00 (cuda55)

Stderr output

<core_client_version>7.0.64</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# GPU [GeForce GTX 660] Platform [Windows] Rev [3170M] VERSION [55]
# SWAN Device 1 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 660
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 2048MB
# Capability : 3.0
# PCI ID : 0000:02:00.0
# Device clock : 1032MHz
# Memory clock : 3004MHz
# Memory width : 192bit
# Driver version : r325_00
# Time per step (avg over 750000 steps): 12.926 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 9694.418 s
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

W7x64
326.41
GTX660Ti
1202MHz
7,968.66

I4R17-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-0-50-RND0647_0 4715246 24 Aug 2013 | 12:51:21 UTC 24 Aug 2013 | 15:49:10 UTC Completed and validated 7,968.66 7,873.42 60,900.00 ACEMD beta version v8.00 (cuda55)

Stderr output

<core_client_version>7.0.64</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# GPU [GeForce GTX 660 Ti] Platform [Windows] Rev [3170M] VERSION [55]
# SWAN Device 0 :
# Name : GeForce GTX 660 Ti
# ECC : Disabled
# Global mem : 2048MB
# Capability : 3.0
# PCI ID : 0000:05:00.0
# Device clock : 1110MHz
# Memory clock : 3004MHz
# Memory width : 192bit
# Driver version : r325_00
# Time per step (avg over 750000 steps): 10.636 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 7976.849 s
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

The actual clock speed of the GTX660Ti while running is typically 1189 or 1202MHz, not 1110MHz. The GTX660 is 1058MHz.

Don't know how close these WU's are to the real thing, but I suspect the GK110 cards might offer more to some WU types than others, and might open up opportunities.

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Win7x64
326.80
GTX660
1032MHz
9,981.93

---

Greetings from TJ

Might also be of interest,

I2R14-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-6-50-RND4316_0 running on a GTX660 (W7)
GPU power ~97% (short run wu was 93%)
GPU temp 67°C (short run WU was 70°C) fan set to 67% (2100rpm)
GPU usage 95% (short run WU was 88%)
Core clock 1071MHz (same as with the short run WU)
Memory usage 879MB (short run was 403MB)

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

I had these on my GTX660. But I can´t give you the details when running as I didn´t see it at the time.

The one I have now I1R12-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2-16-50-RND2792 running on the 660, uses:
GPU power: ~97%
GPU temp.:69°C
GPU load: ~94%
MEM load: 51%, 1048MB
Core clock: 1032MHz

---

Greetings from TJ

TJ, in science there is nothing better than independent confirmation. Thanks,

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Your welcome skgiven, it was a relief to me that my 660 is behaving almost the same as yours.

---

Greetings from TJ