Message boards :
Number crunching :
frsmd_f_ga version 5.20
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This was for a ...RUNC16R... task. Work completed in 22 hours. I noticed there were now 5 upload files instead of just one as before. Alpha Tester ~~ BOINCin since 10-Apr-2004 (2.28) ~~~ Join team USA
|
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This was for a ...RUNC16R... task. Also ops counting is now retuned by the application giving an approximate credit claim and the CPU time is maintained between restarts. GDF |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My account shows another error: Result ID 5684 With CPU time 0.02 <core_client_version>5.9.11</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process got signal 11 </message> <stderr_txt> SIGSEGV: segmentation violation </stderr_txt> ]]> |
GDFSend message Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1958 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My account shows another error: I saw it but so far it is an isolated case. Maybe some problem downloading. |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Also ops counting is now returned by the application giving an approximate credit claim and the CPU time is maintained between restarts. Glad we got this working ;) I shut down last night for about an hour, oops, I forgot to write down times, but it appears result finished in about same time as another result 22:06:48 vs 22:05:58. I try some more over then next few tasks. It seems to me before I had one I suspended for 3 hours, and the final run time showed as 3 hours greater than several other results, back on the 19 hour ones. or if I shut down and restarted the time was less than 19 hours, whatever it ran from restart to finish. |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Progress report. All is good. Another completed, I suspended for 42 minutes. Final time reports as 22:06:51 |
Krunchin-Keith [USA]Send message Joined: 17 May 07 Posts: 512 Credit: 111,288,061 RAC: 0 Level ![]() Scientific publications ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Progress report. Another success. Another completed, I shut down for some time, upon restart resumed OK. Final time reports as 22:08:39, fairly close to the others completed. No problems noted if suspend/resume or shutdown/restart over last few tasks, except the one unexplained failure, but I was not home when it happened, the results all validated and run times all very close. |
©2025 Universitat Pompeu Fabra