Hey guys,

I have put some new work on the long queue. These workunits are small and don't require any special algorithms, so should be no problems.

With these workunits, I'll be looking at the folding of a small peptide using a special force field. The biophysics community uses different force fields to represent the motions of proteins and other molecules, and we are attempting to test a new one so we can check some previous work and feel comfortable in work we are planning to do.

Happy crunching.

Nate

Thanks, how are the WUs identified: (NATHAN_???).

I'm currently running I62R8-NATHAN_KIDc22_2-0-8-RND1007.

KIDc22 is new to me: been running (steady progress) for nine hours on a GTX 670, and only reached 78%. That's hardly 'small' - in fact, the slowest I've seen.

I've finished 4 so far, GTX680 took 9 hours 40 minutes, GTX670 about 10 hours 167,550 points.

167k credits for 51k secs (small? ^^) on 570. Needs some cpu time too. Looks good to me.

---

DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at

I think Nathan's referring to some new ones, not the NATHAN_KID. That's why I asked the question above...

This is confusing, these are new to me, I never saw them until yesterday. He must be running 2 different kinds wu's, I guess I'll find out soon enough.

This is confusing, these are new to me, I never saw them until yesterday. He must be running 2 different kinds wu's, I guess I'll find out soon enough.

So will we all... :-)

This is confusing, these are new to me, I never saw them until yesterday. He must be running 2 different kinds wu's, I guess I'll find out soon enough.

So will we all... :-)

The last WU in the database (a few seconds ago) was http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=4476102 - and it's a NATHAN_KIDc22

Thanks for the interesting background information, Nathan! It's appreciated.

MrS

---

Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

Thanks for the interesting background information, Nathan! It's appreciated.

MrS

Indeed! I always feel good and like to know what i´m working on. It´s just awesome. The Nathan_Kid flavor are running just fine all over around here!

Thanks from me, too, Nate.

Thanks, Nate.

My 580 has little trouble finishing them in 24-hours, but my 460 takes about 25.5 hours to finish one. It would be nice to have WUs that finished on 460's in under 24 hours.

---

Thanks, Nate.

My 580 has little trouble finishing them in 24-hours, but my 460 takes about 25.5 hours to finish one. It would be nice to have WUs that finished on 460's in under 24 hours.

+1

I received 3 running Linux. All ran fine and completed in about 11hr20min on a 660TI. I then booted into XP and ran 2 more. They also ran and completed without issue but actually finished them about 10 minutes faster than Linux. Love the credits.

Yes, the WUs are called NATHAN_KID... workunits. I should have mentioned that Initially. There will be some NEW new stuff soon as well, but I won't make a new post, but update here. There will also be a new batch of WUs coming from a new scientist that will go on the short queue. That will be announced in a new thread.

Ok, there are two groups from me on the grid right now:
NATHAN_KIDc22_2
NATHAN_KIDc22_SODcharge

So you guys know. The second group might run a little faster. You'll have to tell me.

I'm currently running http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=6905151

on a 660Ti @ 1137Mhz / 3019Mhz
and it's taking about 381 seconds per frame.
Which puts it at around 10.5 hours runtime.

kinda poor GPU usage at ~85%.

Great new units 98% gpu load on 570 with estimated 11,5 hours runtime.

---

DSKAG Austria Research Team: http://www.research.dskag.at

I've finished 4 so far, GTX680 took 9 hours 40 minutes, GTX670 about 10 hours 167,550 points.

I’ve done two NATHAN_KIDc22s on my stock-clocks GTX 660. Both kept one CPU core fully occupied (acemd.2865P.exe), and both used a modest amount of GPU resource; see snapshots below.

The first took 15h31m of run time for 167,550 credits, the second 12h27m for 134,000 credits.