GeForce 770 & 780, the same appearance as the TITAN.





http://www.chiphell.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=743127

@+
*_*

---

More information here:

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-700-series-enthusiast-roadmap-leaked-gtx-780-feature-gk110300-gpu-3-gb-memory/

Going by that, and similar speculation, NVidia will drop a trimmed down version of the Titan into the GeForce 700 series (presumably still CC3.5) and call it a GTX780, re-brand their GTX680 as a GTX770 (probably still CC3.0), and their GTX670 as a GTX760.
While I guess there might be a few performance tweaks, such as a slight bump in frequencies, such branding/marketing strategies are really just another exercise in confusion.

We best wait and see what actually turns up (at the end of the month going by the rumors).

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

GeForce 780, After the card, the box,



Available May 23.

@+
*_*

---

Just bought another 650 Ti at the egg yesterday for $85. How much will these cost and how much faster will they be? Oh, forgot, they probably won't even run GPUGrid until...???
But joy, they're windows8 compatible;-)

NVIDIA Publicly Announces the GeForce GTX 780 At GeForce E-Sports

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-publicly-announces-geforce-gtx-780-geforce-esports/

---

As soon as the microcenter by my house gets one in stock, ill be purchasing the 780. Been itching to do a new build for awhile. Plan on using a Haswell processor, but may end up trying out IB-E. Dependson how much money I feel like spending.

The Gainward GTX 770 Phantom 2GB has a base clock of 1150MHz and a boost of 1202MHz.

The Inno3D iChill GTX 770 HerculeZ X3 Ultra 2GB has a base of 1150MHz, boost at 1210MHz, they must be getting some excellent yields from their chips! Most of the new cards come with the voltages unlocked in the video BIOS, guess we better be carful or the error rate might skyrocket.

Competitive price and open to manufacturer designs - excellent!
I'm expecting a nice range of these GPU's. For here the more reference models will likely be ~5% faster than a GTX680 (perhaps 10% as the 7GHz GDDR will make up for the bus), but the more adventurous models could be ~20% faster. The 1.2v comes at the expense/lure of a 230W TDP.

Market wise, I think NVidia have excelled this time...

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

I can't believe EVGA has 10 GTX770's and 7 GTX780 cards not including their hydro models. I agree that the GTX770 is going to be a great series for GPUGRID, it's going to be interesting to see how well they do. The 770 will work right out of the box, unlike the Titan or 780, I think it's using an updated GK104 chip maybe?

I think it's using an updated GK104 chip maybe?

No, it's just using the same GK104. Maybe a newer revision, but this would apply to others as well.

MrS

---

Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

I can't believe EVGA has 10 GTX770's and 7 GTX780 cards not including their hydro models. I agree that the GTX770 is going to be a great series for GPUGRID, it's going to be interesting to see how well they do. The 770 will work right out of the box, unlike the Titan or 780, I think it's using an updated GK104 chip maybe?

Seriously. Any idea why the 770 will work and not the 780/Titan? I wasn't impressed with the price/performance ratio of the Titan or even the 780 but the 770 looks like a winner.

I was just assuming that it would work because it's GK104 chip same as the 600's, the Titan and 780 are GK110. I wonder if anyone has bought a GTX770 and tried it, is there any way to find out?

Only going by the first extremely short Betas to successfully run on a Titan it doesn't look any faster than a GTX680. It might take some time to get the most from it - architecturally its a very different beast than a GK104, and conversely a GTX770 is basically a supped up GTX680. I can't think of any reason why a GTX770 wouldn't work straight out of the box, but we cannot say for sure until someone tests one. The Titans on the other hand - I'm not keen on them, so far.

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

Just bought a 780 (non-reference) today. Will be buying a Haswell tomorrow, and building everything between Monday-Tuesday. Ugh this stuff get's expensive lol. Fun to build though.

Anyways, I'm not surprised the beta is running around where a 680 is. Took GPUgrid quite some time to get the first batch of Kepler working properly. I just hope they can eventually get the most out of these cards. They offer quite a bit more than the GK104 parts in terms of well, everything. All operating at pretty much the same clock rate (save maybe 50 MHz or so).

Will be starting betas when I can.

Cheers.

Only going by the first extremely short Betas to successfully run on a Titan it doesn't look any faster than a GTX680. It might take some time to get the most from it - architecturally its a very different beast than a GK104, and conversely a GTX770 is basically a supped up GTX680. I can't think of any reason why a GTX770 wouldn't work straight out of the box, but we cannot say for sure until someone tests one. The Titans on the other hand - I'm not keen on them, so far.

So it might turn out that a GTX 770 is faster than a GTX 780 or a Titan at GPUGrid, at least for a while. Maybe longer. Interesting though.

The GPUGrid devs might need to change the app to better accommodate the Titans.
In my opinion the Titan is too expensive compared to the GTX770 and GTX780. The GTX780 may or may not turn out to be a good card, but it's really wait and see time. I just cant see the GTX770 not being a good card (if setup correctly). Tuning the GTX770 might turn out to be an issue, but this is a hands on project, and the Titans might have higher RTM rates. I hope that both the GTX780 and GTX770 turn out to be good cards for GPUGrid and the top Titan doesn't fail as much as expected (perhaps better drivers, apps and tuning will combine to make it a good GPU).

I'm looking forward to the rest of the range, hoping that a mid-range GF700 GPU turns up with high GDDR bandwidth.

---

FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help

If and when the GPUG devs start supporting the new top-end cards, I hope they do it in a backwards-compatible manner. I'd hate to see the performance of today's mid-range cards drop (5xx and 6xx, maybe even some 4xx), just for the sake of a few contributors that may have one of the new beasts. We're not all ready (yet) to dish out e.g. 500 euro for a 680 or 400 for a 770. Heck, I'm not even ready to give 200 euro to buy a 660!

Of course, that's just me, my priorities, my budget and my use pattern of the card: no gaming, just crunching.

PS: A 770 next year? Maybe...

---

They wouldn't drop support for older series JUST for those cards, so no worries there. They do offer a nice performance bump however. First step is to get them crunching, than they just need to optimize.

Anyone know the theoretical performance increase for the GPUgrid app?

Guys, relax! Titan is not that different. It's got the same basic SMX's, just with a few more registers per thread and some new functionality, which will surely not be used by GPU-Grid because that would brake backwards compatibility.

And don't judge performance using the numbers from the beta. Even on my relatively small GTX660Ti these have usually very low GPU utilization, which I take comes from the fact that they'd use very small molecules for such tests. This makes it harder for larger cards to stretch their wings (use all their shaders) but is sufficient for a quick test to determine if it works at all.

MrS

---

Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002