nvida 560TI vs GTX680 performance questions

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : nvida 560TI vs GTX680 performance questions
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
William Timbrook

Send message
Joined: 16 Dec 09
Posts: 7
Credit: 1,434,153,821
RAC: 30,470
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 29769 - Posted: 9 May 2013, 5:52:06 UTC - in response to Message 29768.  

I guess where I'm getting confused - sort of - is this is what my boinc manager looks like. I understand the hyperthreading is just cramming more stuff into the same pipe.




Thanks,
William
ID: 29769 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 29772 - Posted: 9 May 2013, 10:12:26 UTC - in response to Message 29769.  
Last modified: 9 May 2013, 10:12:56 UTC

William, your system is working normally.

It's only the Kepler GPU's that are at optimal if they are using a full CPU core, and this was only apparent for the NATHAN_dhfr36_ WU's. It actually suggests that Noelia's work units might benefit from having more CPU access, but that's a different issue.

Your GTX560Ti is a Fermi (not a Kepler). It's Compute Capable 2.1 (while Kepler's are CC3.0, and Titan is CC3.5). The Fermi GPU's don't use as much CPU because they are doing some calculations on the GPU that the Kepler cannot perform on the GPU (different architectures). So the Kepler's use more CPU (well, that's my simplified interpretation). The theory is that if the Keplers are competing for CPU access it will slow down the WU. This was demonstrated to be the case to some extent for both NATHAN's and Noelia's WU's. Basically if you use too much CPU crunching CPU tasks for other projects it will slow the work down here (again only for the Kepler GPU's, and not your Fermi).

Your "0.571 CPU's" is just an estimate, and is usually inaccurate. My "estimate" is ~0.687 for both Nathan's and Noelia's WU's on both my Kepler and Fermi, however the Kepler actually uses 100% of a CPU for Nate's work and 44% for Noelia's work, and my Fermi uses ~12.5% for Nate's work units and and between 5 and 10% for Noelia work.
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help
ID: 29772 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
William Timbrook

Send message
Joined: 16 Dec 09
Posts: 7
Credit: 1,434,153,821
RAC: 30,470
Level
Met
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 29786 - Posted: 10 May 2013, 7:08:05 UTC

skgiven et al.

Thanks for the explanations!

William
ID: 29786 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Matt
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Jan 13
Posts: 216
Credit: 846,538,252
RAC: 0
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 30074 - Posted: 18 May 2013, 21:10:14 UTC - in response to Message 29703.  
Last modified: 18 May 2013, 21:15:20 UTC

skgiven, thanks for the advice. I didn't realize this as the tasks report using 0.721 cores each and together the two 680s would only remove 1 of my cores from crunching CPU tasks (I knew the math didn't make sense). I've now lowered my CPU usage. Hopefully this will improve my contributions. Looking into other sources of slowdown as well.
ID: 30074 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Matt
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Jan 13
Posts: 216
Credit: 846,538,252
RAC: 0
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 30362 - Posted: 25 May 2013, 18:10:18 UTC - in response to Message 29703.  

This may be a silly question, but in BOINC preferences, do I need to set the number of processors used to a certain ratio of the total processors? For example, if I set it to 75% of my 8 cores, that will enable 6 cores. If I set it to 62.5% that will enable 5 of 8 cores. If I were to set it to 70%, this would be 5.6 cores. Is this possible? How does this work, or should I stick to percentages that give whole numbers of cores?
ID: 30362 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile skgiven
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09
Posts: 3968
Credit: 1,995,359,260
RAC: 0
Level
His
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 30363 - Posted: 25 May 2013, 18:23:21 UTC - in response to Message 30362.  

It can't do fractions of a core/thread. So 75% up to 86% is still 6/8 threads. 87.5% is 7/8 threads, as is 89% and 94% and 99%. 100% is all CPU threads, 8/8.
FAQ's

HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help
ID: 30363 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Matt
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Jan 13
Posts: 216
Credit: 846,538,252
RAC: 0
Level
Glu
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 30374 - Posted: 26 May 2013, 0:06:41 UTC - in response to Message 30363.  
Last modified: 26 May 2013, 0:07:09 UTC

Alright, that's what I thought. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. Thank you.
ID: 30374 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : nvida 560TI vs GTX680 performance questions

©2026 Universitat Pompeu Fabra